<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: On Watchlists</title> <atom:link href="http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/</link> <description>Helping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk Control</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: mhargra</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/comment-page-1/#comment-30954</link> <dc:creator>mhargra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5686#comment-30954</guid> <description><![CDATA[That would be pretty cool if we could track recent performance vs. long-term. We do that to some degree - on a quarterly basis - and on a limited basis focusing on long only positions. http://www.insidermonkey.com/hedge-fund/best-performing-hedge-funds]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be pretty cool if we could track recent performance vs. long-term. We do that to some degree &#8211; on a quarterly basis &#8211; and on a limited basis focusing on long only positions. <a
href="http://www.insidermonkey.com/hedge-fund/best-performing-hedge-funds" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidermonkey.com/hedge-fund/best-performing-hedge-funds</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Process - Derek Hernquist &#124; Derek Hernquist</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/comment-page-1/#comment-30952</link> <dc:creator>Process - Derek Hernquist &#124; Derek Hernquist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:29:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5686#comment-30952</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] nothing with David Merkel in terms of timeframe and strategy, but respect his process and the words regular, incremental improvements remind me that doing the little things over time adds up to a big thing. Joe Fahmy trades high [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nothing with David Merkel in terms of timeframe and strategy, but respect his process and the words regular, incremental improvements remind me that doing the little things over time adds up to a big thing. Joe Fahmy trades high [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wednesday links: Japan&#039;s end game - Abnormal Returns &#124; Abnormal Returns</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/comment-page-1/#comment-30944</link> <dc:creator>Wednesday links: Japan&#039;s end game - Abnormal Returns &#124; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:38:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5686#comment-30944</guid> <description><![CDATA[[...] On building a watch list.  (Aleph Blog) [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On building a watch list.  (Aleph Blog) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/comment-page-1/#comment-30943</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:24:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5686#comment-30943</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is also worth writing about. Expect to see something over the next two weeks. Thanks, David]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is also worth writing about. Expect to see something over the next two weeks. Thanks, David</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mediocrepat</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/comment-page-1/#comment-30942</link> <dc:creator>mediocrepat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5686#comment-30942</guid> <description><![CDATA[David-
Love the blog, and really appreciate each new submission you create.
I&#039;d love to hear more about &quot;valuation metrics, sentiment variables, and other factors.&quot;  Are these quantitative formulas that I could adopt for myself?  I like the idea of ranking your current and prospective holdings.  What method do you use to assign a value to each company for grouping?
Thanks again,
Pat]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David-</p><p>Love the blog, and really appreciate each new submission you create.</p><p>I&#8217;d love to hear more about &#8220;valuation metrics, sentiment variables, and other factors.&#8221;  Are these quantitative formulas that I could adopt for myself?  I like the idea of ranking your current and prospective holdings.  What method do you use to assign a value to each company for grouping?</p><p>Thanks again,<br
/> Pat</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Merkel</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/comment-page-1/#comment-30941</link> <dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5686#comment-30941</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is worth writing about.  Expect to see something over the next two weeks.  Thanks, David]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is worth writing about.  Expect to see something over the next two weeks.  Thanks, David</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hippoicthus</title><link>http://alephblog.com/2012/12/26/on-watchlists/comment-page-1/#comment-30940</link> <dc:creator>hippoicthus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:18:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alephblog.com/?p=5686#comment-30940</guid> <description><![CDATA[A bit off topic, David, but something I&#039;ve been thinking about:
Given your comments about incremental improvements, what do you think about the idea that investment manager performance should be judged not by the returns of the portfolio, but by the returns of the new ideas and sold ideas versus the static portfolio?    i.e. measure the value of the decisions made recently versus those made in the past?
Given the wide availability of 13-Ds and our ability to copycat others with low-turnover strategies, might this not be a better measure of the value investors are getting for the fees they&#039;re paying?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit off topic, David, but something I&#8217;ve been thinking about:</p><p>Given your comments about incremental improvements, what do you think about the idea that investment manager performance should be judged not by the returns of the portfolio, but by the returns of the new ideas and sold ideas versus the static portfolio?    i.e. measure the value of the decisions made recently versus those made in the past?</p><p>Given the wide availability of 13-Ds and our ability to copycat others with low-turnover strategies, might this not be a better measure of the value investors are getting for the fees they&#8217;re paying?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>