Day: July 13, 2013

Book Review: Poverty and Progress

Book Review: Poverty and Progress

I appreciated this book.? In my early 20s, I wanted to do development work in developing countries, but I ran into a problem.? All of the interventionist solutions didn’t work, and countries that ignored the advice of development economists tended to do better.? That has continued to be true since then.? Among academic economists, the battle goes on between the socialists and free marketers.? The battle goes on in many arenas:

  • It is easy to do cross-sectional time-series regressions across countries, and twist the data to your bias.? In general, more flexible the econometric technique, the lower the probability that it tells an accurate story.? Noise gets interpreted as signal. [The Ph. D.s at the Fed are experts at this.]
  • How much of poverty is due to culture, recalcitrant governments denying property rights to their people, etc?
  • How much different was it for the now developed nations to develop during their era?? Do the same principles apply?
  • Are there really “poverty traps” in development?
  • Are there structural problems in development that naturally occur, or does it stem from government interference?

This book takes an optimistic view on development, against the crowd that creates complex models in order to allege market imperfections, rather than government imperfections.? The truth is that poverty in the world is in retreat, and abject poverty may not exist in another generation, aside from nations that sabotage themselves.? Nations that are growing can follow the same path of freedom as the developed nations did.

This book will open your eyes on global poverty, and make you realize that we are close to success, aside from self-inflicted wounds.? It will also make you think through the metaphysics and ethics of global warming, and explain to you why it is unfair for the developed nations to constrain the developing nations regarding use of hydrocarbons.? [For those that are rabid bigots on global warming, this book argues that global cooling is happening.? Is your mind open enough to consider the argument?]

I recommend this book highly.? Well written, and not afraid to take some non-consensus views in favor of freedom.

Quibbles

None.

Who would benefit from this book: You have to be interested in development economics to enjoy this book.? If you want to, you can buy it here: Poverty and Progress: Realities and Myths about Global Poverty.

Full disclosure: The publisher sent me a copy of the book for free.

If you enter Amazon through my site, and you buy anything, I get a small commission.? This is my main source of blog revenue.? I prefer this to a ?tip jar? because I want you to get something you want, rather than merely giving me a tip.? Book reviews take time, particularly with the reading, which most book reviewers don?t do in full, and I typically do. (When I don?t, I mention that I scanned the book.? Also, I never use the data that the PR flacks send out.)

Most people buying at Amazon do not enter via a referring website.? Thus Amazon builds an extra 1-3% into the prices to all buyers to compensate for the commissions given to the minority that come through referring sites.? Whether you buy at Amazon directly or enter via my site, your prices don?t change.

 

Temporary Prosperity at the Cost of Longer-term Prosperity

Temporary Prosperity at the Cost of Longer-term Prosperity

Apologies for last night’s post on Bernanke.? I have deleted it.? It was not one of my finer efforts (it was late), and I went down some rabbit-trails that overshadowed my main, and valid point.? Bernanke has no business criticizing Congress for running a less accommodative policy, when he is signaling a less accommodative policy.? Congress does not have a communications strategy that investors rely on.? The Fed does, and Bernanke has made a lot out of transparent communications, which I believe is a harmful concept that is bearing bad fruit now.? So when he signals that policy accommodation will be less, and sooner than you think, why should he be surprised at the carnage in the bond market?? Markets are discounting mechanisms, they anticipate.? Why can’t the Fed Chairman recognize that, rather than saying the market misunderstood him?

That was a good thing with the Fed, pre-Greenspan.? It was much easier to understand the Fed when they said nothing.? Onto tonight’s piece:

Borrowing from the Future to Take Care of the Present

I am a fan of balanced budgets.? Why?? Balanced budgets are sustainable.? This is particularly true if budgets are balanced on an accrual basis.

Politicians like to promise more than they deliver.? They are like J. Wellington Wimpy, who said, “I would gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”? Goods and services today, payment later.

This happens in a lot of ways, large and small:

  • Federal Pension Plans are unfunded, supported by the taxation authority of the Federal Government.
  • Running large deficits that don’t do much good for the economy as a whole, while racking up debts that will have to be paid by future generations.
  • Running monetary policies that improve conditions today, but will worsen future conditions as a result.? Far better to let recessions bite, eliminating bad debt & projects, and leave behind a less indebted society, ready to grow.
  • Social Security & Medicare are unsustainable programs created by our grandparents, sustained by our parents.? These programs will kill the rest of us with their costs.? Our forebears ate sour grapes, and our teeth are set on edge.? And with each generation it gets worse, as the demographic crisis makes it harder to sustain.
  • Obamacare front-end loaded taxes, and back-end loaded benefits.? We are now faced with the costs, and the taxes have been spent on other matters.? Aside from that, the estimates when the bill was passed were dishonest.
  • States & municipalities played with their pension assumptions for years, offering generous benefits that could not be afforded under intelligent assumptions.? It becomes benefits today, taxes tomorrow.
  • Tax policy encourages debt rather than equity, creating industries that over-borrow.

Things could have been better at this point had the Fed done its job and let recessions bite, eliminating bad debts.? Congress could have run balanced budgets, constraining spending on all departments.? The Social Security surplus could have been walled off from the government, and invested in index funds.? States & municipalities could have funded their pension plans fully, and not used the flexibility to fund other spending.? We could have had a tax code that did not tax dividends, but offered no deduction for interest.? We could have constrained the Fed’s ability to act.

We have a mess now as a result of politicians promising, with funding to some later.? In the 1840s over-indebted governments defaulted, and there were many revolutions in Europe.? What will be the price in the modern era, with our over-indebted governments?

I don’t know.? But I suspect it will be ugly.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira