Day: March 12, 2014

On the Structure of Berkshire Hathaway

On the Structure of Berkshire Hathaway

Berkshire Hathaway [BRK] is a unique company. ?You have a property-casualty insurance giant owning many businesses directly through insurance subsidiaries, including huge businesses like a Class 1 Railroad — BNSF.

Yes, National Indemnity owns BNSF in entire, and many other businesses as well. ?I thought the pre-crisis org chart of AIG was complex — because of the many industries that it covers, BRK is far more complex. ? In the 2012 statutory statements, it runs for 22 pages. ?Let me list the top-level subsidiaries, and any significant lower level subsidiaries they own.

  1. Affordable Housing Partners (common for reducing taxes w/ section 42 housing)
  2. Albecca (Larson-Juhl)
  3. AU Holding Company (Applied Underwriters
  4. Ben Bridge Corporation
  5. Benjamin Moore
  6. Berkshire Hathaway Credit Corp (BH Media — all the little newspapers)
  7. Berkshire Hathaway Finance Corp
  8. BH Columbia Inc (Columbia Insurance, Medical Protective Corp [which owns Lubrizol debt])
  9. BH Housing LLC
  10. BH Shoe Holdings, Inc.
  11. BH-IMC Holdings B.V. (“Iscar”)
  12. BHSF (SF = Scott Fetzer)
  13. Blue Chip Stamps, Inc. ?(Really, still around?)
  14. Borsheim Jewelry Company
  15. Brookwood Insurance Company
  16. Business Wire, Inc.
  17. Central States of Omaha Companies, Inc.
  18. CORT Business Services Corp
  19. CTB International Corp.
  20. Cypress Insurance Company
  21. Forest River, Inc.
  22. Fruit of the Loom, Inc.
  23. Garan, Inc.
  24. Gateway Underwriters Agency
  25. General Re Corporation (seems to own much of Fruit of the Loom)
  26. Helzberg’s Diamond Shops
  27. International Dairy Queen
  28. Johns Manville Corp
  29. Jordan’s Furniture
  30. Justin Brands (Acme Brick)
  31. Marmon Holdings
  32. MidAmerican Energy Holdings (CalEnergy, HomeServices of America, Magma Power, NV Energy, Pacificorp)
  33. MiTek Industries
  34. MS Property
  35. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
  36. National Indemnity (Flightsafety, BNSF, CLAL, GEICO, Clayton Homes, McLane, TTI)
  37. National Liability & Fire Insurance Company
  38. Nebraska Furniture Mart
  39. NetJets, Inc.
  40. Northern States Agency, Inc.
  41. OTC Worldwide Holdings (Oriental Trading Company)
  42. Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc.
  43. R. C. Willey Home Furnishings
  44. Richline Group, Inc.
  45. See’s Candy Shops
  46. Shaw Industries Group
  47. Star Furniture Company
  48. The Buffalo News, Inc.
  49. The Fechheimer Brothers Company
  50. The Lubrizol Corp
  51. The Pampered Chef, Lrd.
  52. US Investment Corporation
  53. Wesco-Financial Insurance Company
  54. XTRA Corp

BRK is huge, and Buffett prefers owning whole companies to portions of companies, because then the entire free cash flow is available to him, not just the dividends.

The first question to answer is why does Buffett have some industrial companies inside his insurers, and some not? ?That has to do with risk-based capital. ?P&C insurers have to put up capital equal to 22.5% on equity of affiliated insurers, and 15% on non-affiliated common stocks, and 20% on Schedule BA investments that are similar to stocks. ?These are more liberal than the standards for life companies, which ?have a 30% charge on stocks. ? (Which doesn’t make sense, because life insurers have longer balance sheets, and have a better ability to hold equities, but I digress…)

But even if they have to put up capital to own the companies, BRK has a negative cost of capital inside its insurers, because they make underwriting profits. ?What a business — make money on insurance, and on businesses owned by the insurance subsidiary.

One more thing about BRK’s insurance subsidiaries — in general, because they have so much asset risk, they don’t write as much insurance as other companies of their size would.

Tomorrow, I will write part 2 on this, regarding the one anomaly I found going through BRK’s statutory books, the Harney Investment Trust. ?Till then.

Full disclosure: long BRK/B for clients and me

Why I Don’t Write a Newsletter

Why I Don’t Write a Newsletter

At various points over the last 20 years, various friends have encouraged me to write a newsletter. ? I have resisted these requests, because in general, I don’t have respect for newsletter writers.

If you’ve got great ideas, invest in them, and start a firm to do so for others. ?Don’t hide behind the virtual sham of “this is only entertainment.” ?I’ve been blogging for seven years, and I am not trying to entertain but to educate. ?I don’t give financial advice because I don’t know who I am speaking to; everything is general, so what I write may be applicable to some readers, but certainly not all readers.

Second, since I have created my own firm, I owe a duty to my clients that they get my best insights, implicitly or explicitly. ?Implicitly: I no longer mention what my holdings are, unless I write about them. ?At present, the sharpest reader who is not a client knows 20% of my equity portfolio at best. ?Explicitly, I write to my clients once a quarter, and tell them what I am thinking, and why I have taken the actions that I have in their portfolios.

It is simpler for me from an ethics and compliance standpoint to keep public and private information separate. ?It gives my clients the focus they deserve, and allows me to write on a wide amount of topics of interest to many people, without doing damage to either side. ?As always, if I have a position in something I write about, I will disclose it.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira