The Yield Curve Can?t Invert With Fed Manipulation

This piece should be short.? I have heard otherwise intelligent people say that the economy can?t go into a recession because the slope of the Treasury yield curve is too positive.

With the Fed trying to manipulate the yield curve for its own policy purposes, starving savers of income, the yield curve is not a useful measure.? To invert the Treasury yield curve when the Fed is holding short rates at zero, we would have to see the Fed engage in Quantitative Easing to the degree that Treasury Notes and Bonds can be issued at significant negative interest rates.

To argue that we can?t have a recession at present because of the Treasury yield curve essentially says that if the Fed holds short rates at zero, we can?t have a recession.

I?m sorry, but with an overindebted economy, we can have a structural, not cyclical recession, where the shape of the yield curve doesn?t matter much because of all the debt.? When large portions of the economy have no inclination to borrow, monetary policy, even unorthodox and evil monetary policy has little effect on the real economy, where ordinary people borrow money (excluding from the GSEs).

This is another reason why I think the Fed actions to twist the yield curve will fail. ?They can twist the curve, yeah, but it will do little to stimulate an overindebted economy where many mortgage loans are inverted.

The Fed may control the Treasury yield curve, but it does not control the free market yield curve where (aside from Fannie and Freddie and the FHA), ordinary people and firms borrow.

 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 

PS — I’m still without power.? Yeah, day 7, and I’m in the lucky 2%.? Still, we’re not doing badly, and this is a lesson from God, teaching us patience.

.? I thought I would have more to say on yesterday’s piece, but I don’t.? If anyone reading this has a copy of what a collateral swap agreement looks like, I would enjoy looking through it.

5 thoughts on “The Yield Curve Can?t Invert With Fed Manipulation

  1. Th Fed is *not* starving savers of income. Money is no different from any other commodity and thus there is absolutely no reason why it *should* have a positive real rate of return. It might at some times, but it is not its divine right and, historically, money has been a bad investment.

    I feel bad for the savers that took reinvestment or option risk via callables that they didn’t understand. Their advisers should be held accountable. But let’s not cry for the poor bond-holders yet, duration has been a remarkable investment with a lot of capital gains for holders of long duration assets. Let’s not forget, yesterday’s bonds don’t generate less current income today, they just yield less because they could be sold for more.

Comments are closed.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira