This should be short. ?Remember that credit and equity volatility are strongly related.
I am dubious about conditions in the bank loan market because Collateralized Loan Obligations [CLOs] are hot now and there are many that want to take the highest level of risk there. ?I realize that I am usually early on credit?issues, but there are many piling into CLOs, and willing to take the first loss in exchange for a high yield. ?Intermediate-term, this is not a good sign.
Note that corporations take 0n more debt when rates are low. ?They overestimate how much debt they can service, because if rates rise, they are not prepared for the effect on earnings per share, should the cost of the debt reprice.
It’s a different issue, but consider China with all of the bad loans its banks have made. ?They are facing another significant default, and the Chinese Government looks like it will let the default happen. ?That will not likely be true if the solvency of one of their banks is threatened, so keep aware as the risks unfold.
Finally, look at the peace and calm of low implied volatilities of the equity markets. ?It feels like 2006, when parties were willing to sell volatility with abandon because the central banks of our world had everything under control. ?Ah, remember that? ?Maybe it is time to buy volatility when it is cheap. ?Now here is my question to readers: aside from buying long Treasury bonds, what investments can you think of that benefit from rising implied volatility and credit spreads, aside from options and derivatives? ?Leave you answers in the comments or email me.
This will sound weird, but I am not as much worried about government bond rates rising, as I am with credit spreads rising. ?Again, remember, I am likely early here, so don’t go nuts applying my logic.
PS — weakly related, also consider the pervasiveness of BlackRock’s risk control model. ?Dominant risk control models may not truly control risk, because who will they sell to? ?Just another imbalance of which to be wary.
There are several ETPs that would benefit, although they are partly based on derivatives:
– Volatility based: VXX, VIXY, UVXY, VXZ.
– Stock and volatility based: VQT (ETN) PHDG (ETF).
– Inverse ETFs: SH, SDS, TZA, etc.
Strategies with negative carry will profit from rising volatility. The inverse YEN – AUD carry trade rose 50% during 2008.
Why “aside from options”? They work fine for IV changes.
I don’t do options.
A bit weirder of a call (admittedly) but over the longer term somebody like OAK should benefit from the blowout of credit spreads — they’ve got cash raised already to invest in the next distressed cycle…
The daily VIX instruments are terrible due to the term structure of the futures… db (and soon to be ProShares) actually have “sell protection” ETFs based on the OTR CDX indices (both IG and HY) which might be a possibility?
A trend-following strategy using moving averages might benefit from rising realized volatility. For example:
http://managed-futures-blog.attaincapital.com/2013/08/06/forget-the-vix-look-at-global-market-volatility/