Unlike many commentators, I tend to think credit scores are a good thing. In a big world, it is difficult for large financial institutions to figure out the most import “C” of the four Cs of Credit — Character. ?Credit scores offer an imperfect but generally useful shortcut in what is often an anonymous world.
In my last article on the topic, I noted that in addition to lending, credit scores are used in renting, insurance, employment, and a wide number of other areas. ?One new place where credit scores could prove useful is analyzing a prospective spouse. ?An academic paper suggests the following:
- Birds of a feather flock together — in general, people tend to enter into long-term relationships?those?with similar credit scores.
- Relationships?with higher credit scores tend to last longer.
- Those with larger gaps in the credit scores have a higher probability of the relationship ending sooner.
Though the paper is more broad than marriage, I am going to shift over to marriage for the rest of this article. ?Why? ?Every now and then, I get called in to do marriage counseling, typically along with my pastor and fellow elders. ?I’m not perfect, so my marriage isn’t perfect, but it is very good.
Marriages tend to fail because the husband and wife disagree on goals or methods for the partnership that they have entered into. ?Common disagreements and problems involve:
- Money
- Sex
- Children — number, methods of raising
- Lack of companionship — shared goals, responsibilities, etc.
- Bad communication patterns
- Sins that need to be repented of — anger & abuse, adultery & related, laziness, substance abuse,?disdain, lying, etc.
- And more — there are more ways to get it wrong than to get it right, just as there are more wrong answers on tests than right answers.
I’m only going to handle the money issue here, though laziness, lying, bad communication, and lack of clearly specifying and agreeing to goals play a large role in money problems. ?Going back to my earlier article on credit scores, you might recall that I said that credit scores were a moderately accurate measure of moral tendency on average. ?Quoting:
Honoring agreements that you have entered into is an important indicator of your personality.? Those who do not repay are on average less moral than those that repay.? Those that are net creditors on average made efforts that net debtors did not.
Credit scores are important.? In a specific way, they measure your willingness to keep your word.? Anytime you enter into a debt contract, you make a promise to repay.? If you fulfill your promise to repay, you impress others as one of good moral character.? If you don?t repay, it is vice-versa, you appear to be of low moral character.? (Note: I am excluding those that got hoodwinked by lenders that defrauded borrowers in a variety of ways.? That said, if you can be hoodwinked, that says something else about you, and that may have an impact on your creditworthiness as well.)
Now, before I continue, these concepts work on average, and not always in particular.? I have helped some at the edge of society with gifts and loans.? In some cases there is a cascade of bad events that the most intelligent would have a hard time facing.? Being wise helps, but there are some situations that would tax the soul of anyone, and be difficult to claim that they were blameworthy; it?s just the way things happened.
The “keeping your word” part is important for marriage. ?After all, marriage begins with a simple public promise of mutual fidelity between a man and a woman. ?If you can’t keep your word in one area, i.e., paying off a debt, your ability to keep your word in another area, marital fidelity, may be less likely as well. ?As such, it shouldn’t be too surprising that those with higher credit scores tend to have longer lasting relationships on average. ?They keep their word better, and will tend to have fewer money problems, because they manage their finances well.
As for the couples that have dramatically different credit scores between the two of them, there is the possibility that the more responsible one will get fed up with the lack of discipline on the part of his/her spouse. ?Or, the one with less self-controlled spouse will grow to disdain the one trying to bring order. ?If not handled properly, it can lead to a breakup — no one wants to feel their resources are being wasted, and no one likes constant criticism.
No Determinism Here
For those that do have difficulties here, I can tell you that you can change. ?It is not a question of ability, but of willingness to do so. ?The same is true in saving any marriage. ?Ask, “Is this the way I wanted things to end up? ?Didn’t I have better goals than this?” ?and then get to: “Am I willing to give up my bad habits, my purely personal interests, my pride, for the good of my spouse? ?Am I willing to work in the best interests of the both of us, even if I don’t get everything I want?”
Tough stuff. ?It’s a wonder that any marriages hang together. ?But change is possible, and it usually begins with a shared commitment to agree on goals, execute those goals faithfully, leaving behind laziness, overspending and over-committing (taking on too much debt). ?Dave Ramsey and many others are good counselors in this area.
If you have never budgeted before, it will be time to do so. ?Again, there are many good guides on the Internet, and at bookstores. ?Find one that fits your personality and go with it. ?(I have never kept a budget in my life, so I would have a hard time advising there. ?I don’t spend much on myself, and neither does my wife.)
Telling you that you can raise your credit score is superfluous. ?That’s a symptom, not the disease. ?If you manage household finances well, and keep your word on paying debts on time, that will take care of itself. ?The harder thing is changing the bad habits of spending incautiously.
Now, in the short run, for couples where the two parties are different with willingness to manage money well, there is another solution if both parties are willing to do it. ?The one that is less disciplined with money should cede management of finances to the one that is more disciplined. ?The one that is more?disciplined then gives the one that is less disciplined a regular allowance (mutually agreed upon). ?To husbands I would add that if the wife is the one who is better the money, cede that to her, and don’t let your pride get in the way. ?Be grateful that you have a bright and responsible wife, and take delight in it. ?Far better to have an orderly and well-run household than to have a household that is failing.
This is up to?both parties to the marriage to make it work. ?It is easy to be selfish, and hard to accept the fact that we are flawed in the way that we handle relationships. ?Once humility comes (something that I need too), and communication improves, then real progress can be made in repairing household finances, and hopefully bigger things as well — life isn’t all about money. ?But when money is badly handled, it is an engine of relationship destruction.
Thus, if you have money problems in marriage, choose wisely, be humble and unselfish, and do what is best for the one that you pledged to love till death do you part.
I think you overlook, or at least miss the opportunity, the connection between the implications of the research and a bit of early learning that is fundamental to ego growth: delayed gratification.
It is very much a learned skill, and underlies ones ability to navigate the labyrinth that is credit: want vs. need. And a skill that is equally foundational to intrapersonal relationships, most certainly ones that include the both the prospect and consummation of sexual intimacy.
That’s a good point, and one I could have expanded on. I did talk about self-control, which is key to all of those things, and sorely lacking in our society today.
So then, many have heard of “Love waits,” even if they disdain it. On economics, it could be, ‘The wise wait before buying.” Not as snappy, but still, a good thought.
Thanks for commenting. I need more of that here.
The way credit scores are calculated isn’t right. I have zero debt (no mortgage!), use one (1) credit card for simple purchases for miles, and in general very conservative with money (read stingy). However, I do not have the best credit score because: I don’t use enough credit! While I’m still high, I am dinged on my score for lack of credit accounts and history, I usually pay cash for everything. So while I don’t worry about not having “perfect” credit scores, I though I would chime in to point out the system being used is flawed, and should the day arrive I need that score, I’ll be penalized for prior responsible behavior.
There are a lot of different scores, and they are tailored to different purposes. I’m like you, so my credit score is high, but not as high as large spenders that use a lot of debt in the process. Some scores reward more debt because it tells the credit card companies that they will be more profitable clients from interchange and possibly interest fees.
Thanks for commenting.
Wow. Our Federal Reserve prints money to pay for research like this. The Fed should just stick to printing money to buy debt from the Treasury so the politicians can pass laws to loan money to phd candidates to write research like this. Clearly, the Fed is upsetting the process and overstepping their ground. Printing money is fine but you must give the printed money to the blow hard politicians not spend it yourself on equally silly projects.
Thing is, the Fed’s economists are at work on around half of all macroeconomic research that gets published — with all the money they add to the process, they silence almost all critics. Who wants to bite the hand that feeds them?
Thanks for commenting.
“Those who do not repay are on average less moral than those that repay…”
With a high credit score, and an average of several dozen partners outside of marriage, each year, I think the FED- funded research (and your speculations) don’t hold water.
Many people have a high level of honesty and integrity –outside of the bedroom.