Author: David Merkel
David J. Merkel, CFA, FSA, is a leading commentator at the excellent investment website RealMoney.com. Back in 2003, after several years of correspondence, James Cramer invited David to write for the site, and write he does -- on equity and bond portfolio management, macroeconomics, derivatives, quantitative strategies, insurance issues, corporate governance, and more. His specialty is looking at the interlinkages in the markets in order to understand individual markets better. David is also presently a senior investment analyst at Hovde Capital, responsible for analysis and valuation of investment opportunities for the FIP funds, particularly of companies in the insurance industry. He also manages the internal profit sharing and charitable endowment monies of the firm. Prior to joining Hovde in 2003, Merkel managed corporate bonds for Dwight Asset Management. In 1998, he joined the Mount Washington Investment Group as the Mortgage Bond and Asset Liability manager after working with Provident Mutual, AIG and Pacific Standard Life. His background as a life actuary has given David a different perspective on investing. How do you earn money without taking undue risk? How do you convey ideas about investing while showing a proper level of uncertainty on the likelihood of success? How do the various markets fit together, telling us us a broader story than any single piece? These are the themes that David will deal with in this blog. Merkel holds bachelor's and master's degrees from Johns Hopkins University. In his spare time, he takes care of his eight children with his wonderful wife Ruth.

One New Bit of Data on Prime Agency Collateral

One New Bit of Data on Prime Agency Collateral

Well, it looks like the collateral haircut for repo financing of agency mortgages has gone up, from 3%, to somewhere between 4 and 5%.? That may account for some of the panic, especially regarding Carlyle.? It also may mean that Deerfield Capital is kaput.? I am presently long, but I may sell next week.? This company would be my personal biggest blunder ever, and my apologies to those who were influenced by me to own the company.

full disclosure: long DFR

Bill Pass

Bill Pass

First permanent injection of funds in 10 months.? A bill pass.? Now, it qualifies as permanent, but the $10 billion injection will only last 2-3 months.? Not very permanent to me.

The Fed is doing all it can to cram liquidity into the short end of the market.? They have expanded the TAF to $100 billion, and might go beyond that.

I suspect that these measures can succeed in bring the TED spread down for now, but unless they make the TAF permanent, there will be an effect when they unwind it. ? What these measures can’t do is unjam our mortgage markets.? A coupon pass where they buy some agency debt would make a nice statement.

Buy Agency Bonds.  Buy Agency Passthroughs.

Buy Agency Bonds. Buy Agency Passthroughs.

This will not be a long post.? Ask yourself this: in this environment, would the US government step away from the mortgage agencies?? I think not.? If anything, they might invest in its subordinated debt, particularly if there were a conversion into common stock feature.

Spreads are wide, very wide, and I don’t think the government will let the GSEs fail, particularly after raising their lending limits.? The agencies will need more capital for lending , so I would expect more preferred stock issues, and perhaps an equity issuance, if to a key investor, like the US Government.

I don’t see the US Government guaranteeing all of the debt of the Agencies, but I could see it doing it for a period of years on new issues, particularly if the Government received equity warrants.

In this wide spread environment, I would be a buyer, particularly versus Treasuries.

“The Unwind”

“The Unwind”

I invest like a moderate bull and I reason like a moderate bear.? Why?? In general, in free economies, the equity markets favor the bulls over long periods of time.? So, I stay invested in equities in almost all markets, and let my other risk reduction techniques do my work, rather than making large changes in asset allocation.? That said, I appreciate the risks that the markets have been throwing off lately, and I am somewhat worried.

I have been a bear on residential housing and residential housing finance for the last four years.? I expected that those that took a lot of credit risk — subprime, Alt-A mezzanine and subordinates, would get hurt.? What has surprised me, though, is the degree to which AAA whole loan collateral and agency loan collateral has been hurt.? I failed to see the amount of leverage being employed there.? I looked at that area and said, “You can lever this stuff 10x, and you probably won’t get hurt if you are smart.”? Fine if 10x is the limit, but you had players at over 30x, and now you have that paper being tossed back into the market, depressing prices, and raising yields.? This raises the risk of a self-reinforcing move that will only end when unlevered and lightly levered buyers soak up the high yielding safe assets that couldn’t find a home elsewhere.

Any asset can be overlevered. ? A house, a home loan, a corporation… there is some level of debt that will kill the owner of a given asset.? High quality mortgage paper got overlevered, and even though current market prices are attractive to unlevered buyers, there is the short-term risk that more players will be forced to delever.? So when is the right time to buy?

I have agonized on this one, because the problem is short-term financing.? Repo financing from brokers that have their own balance sheet worries.? (Note: some are talking about mark-to-market accounting — yes, that has a small effect here, but not as large as the financing issue.)? Repo financing is short-term collateralized lending.? 97% of the value of the agency loan collateral gets loaned, with 100% of the agency loan collateral as security.? If collateral prices move down, more margin must be posted. This is an unforgiving situation.? If you can’t meet the margin call (demand for more funds to support a losing position), your collateral will be liquidated.? (There also issues in how one hedges, but that is for another time.)

When to buy?? Most repo funding is short — a day to a week.? Some extends over 30-90 days, and Annaly uses 1-3 year repo financing (where do you get that?).? My sense is this: wait for two weeks after you hear of any major fund liquidation, and commit half a position.? After another two weeks, commit the other half, if no further liquidations have been heard.

At my last firm, I would talk with my boss about “The Unwind.”? All of the areas of the credit market where ordinary prudence was being ignored, and in the short run, leverage was increasing, because is paid to do so in a rising market.? Eventually, asset cash flow would prove insufficient to finance the interest costs, and then “The Unwind” would happen.? Leverage would have to come out of the system, both from explicit loans and from derivative contracts.

We are in “The Unwind” now.? Leverage is coming out, even in asset classes that I did not anticipate.? “The Unwind” will end when players with strong balance sheets hold most of the previously overlevered assets.

No, You <U src=Should Worry About Negative Short TIPS spreads" />

No, You Should Worry About Negative Short TIPS spreads

From four years and shorter, the yields on TIPS reflect a belief that nominal inflation measured by the unadjusted CPI will exceed the yields on nominal treasury bonds. This should come as no surprise, except that it was so slow in coming. The CPI has been running at 3-4%+ annualized for some time now, and the sleepy TIPS market continues to estimate a 2-3% short-term CPI. That, in the face of a rising CPI. (Hey, a reason to buy TIPS! The actual inflation accretion is high than the implied accretion.)

Consider the following graphs:

Source: Federal Reserve, David Merkel

The first chart shows the TIPS-derived inflation breakevens taken from the smoothed series that the Federal Reserve puts out. It is interesting to note that the breakevens today are still below peak levels reached in 2005 and 2006. The second chart takes the breakeven rates to maturity, and calculates the forward breakeven inflation relationships. In this case, the forward breakeven rates have been rising, particularly between five and ten year out, though they are still not at record levels.
The third chart looks the forward inflation curves at five special points in time:

  • 8/24/04 ? Widest spread between expected five-year inflation, and ten-year inflation, ten years forward
  • 9/9/05 ? Largest inversion of the spread between expected five-year inflation, and ten-year inflation, ten years forward
  • 6/29/06 ? End of the tightening cycle, as I date it
  • 8/10/07 ? Beginning of the loosening cycle, as I date it
  • The present

The present environment is unusual because of the relatively large difference between two-year inflation five years forward, and three-year inflation seven years forward. The logical play would be to go long seven-year TIPS, and short seven-year nominal Treasuries. As views on future inflation shift higher, the low implied rate of inflation in the seven-year part of the curve should adjust to the higher inflation forthcoming.

Now, why should the negative TIPS yields on the front end be a concern?? Negative real yields, which are even more negative if trailing actual CPI figures are used, indicate even more inflation to come.? Does this mean sell equities?? No, but don’t hang out in long bonds.? Keep your bonds short, and maybe buy some TIPS, say, 15 years out.? Hedge by selling nominal Treasuries short, if you like.? Negative real yields are a sign inflation is likely to accelerate, particularly when the Fed is showing no signs of raising? rates, but has further decreases coming.

Can You Carry The Position?

Can You Carry The Position?

My post yesterday on corporate bond spreads was received well.? I want to amplify one point that I did not make strongly enough.? During market crises, asset values cheapen not only in response to likely losses over the long run, but the possibility that there might be forced sellers due to:

  • Reduction of leverage because of asset values declining
  • Reduction of leverage because of brokers lending money get skittish
  • Reduction of leverage because of rating agency downgrades
  • Reduction of leverage because of client withdrawals
  • Reduction of leverage because of an increased need for capital from the regulators
  • Arbitrage from falling prices in related markets

This can temporarily self-reinforce falling asset prices, until unlevered (or lightly levered) buyers find the returns from the assets to be compelling.? Though my piece yesterday was more fun to write, this makes the argument plain.? Can you carry the asset through hard times?? What about the rest of the asset holders?

The concept of weak hands versus strong hands is a very real issue, and for those with a subscription to RealMoney, I recommend these four classic (Labor of love) articles of mine:

Managing Liability Affects Stocks, Pt. 1
Separating Weak Holders From the Strong
Get to Know the Holders? Hands, Part 1
Get to Know the Holders? Hands, Part 2

These articles are core to my thinking, and I spent a lot of time on them.

Bloomberg Radio

Bloomberg Radio

Apologies.? I should have put this out earlier, but I will be on Bloomberg Radio Wednesday between 8:15AM and 8:45AM Eastern.? I will see if I can’t get a transcript or a recording.? For those that can listen live, here is the link.? One thing I enjoy about my present employer is that they like my blog, getting quoted in magazines, and being on radio and television.? It builds the business.

I’ll be talking about current economic conditions.? I hope to give a nuanced view that doesn’t jump around with every monthly data point.

What Should the Spread on a Corporate Bond Be?

What Should the Spread on a Corporate Bond Be?

Suppose we had seven guys in the room, an economist, a guy from a ratings agency, an actuary, a guy who does capital structure arbitrage, a derivatives trader, A CDO manager, and a guy who does nonlinear dynamic modeling, and we asked them what the spread on a corporate bond should be.

  • The economist might say whatever spread it trades at at any given moment is the right spread; no one can foretell the future.
  • The guy from the ratings agency would scratch his head, tell you spreads aren’t his job, but then volunteers that spreads are correlated with bond credit ratings on average.
  • The actuary might say that you estimate the default loss rate over the life of the bond, and the required incremental yield that the marginal holder of the bond needs to fund the incremental capital employed. Add those two spreads together, and that is what the spread should be.
  • The capital structure arb would say that he would view the bondholders as short a put from the equityholders, estimate the value of that option using the stock price, equity option implied volatility, and capital structure, and would back into the spread using that data. Higher implied volatility, higher leverage, and lower stock prices lead to higher spreads.
  • The derivatives trader would say, “Look, I sit next to the cash trader. After adjusting for a deliverability option, if cash is sufficiently cheap to to the credit default swap spread, we buy the bond and receive protection through CDS. Vice-versa if the cash bond is sufficiently rich. In general, the bond spread should be near the CDS spread.”
  • The CDO manager would say that it depends on the amount of leverage he and his competitors can employ in buying bonds for his deals, and how dearly he can sell his equity and subordinate tranches.
  • The guy into nonlinear dynamics says, “This is not a good question. There are multiple players in the market with differing goals, funding structures, and regulatory constraints. All of my friends here have the right answer under certain conditions… but at any given point in the market, each has differing levels of influence.”

After we tell the guy into nonlinear dynamics that he didn’t answer the question, he says, “Fine. Look at the high yield market today. Why were spreads so low nine months ago, and so high now? Did likely default costs have something to do with it? Yes, a sophisticated actuarial model would have looked at the quality of originations and seasoning, and would conclude that default costs would rise. But spreads have moved out far more than that. Have costs of holding high yield debt risen? Capital charges have risen as more downgrades have happened, and as anticipated. That’s still not enough. The loss of the bid for high yield bonds from CDOs is significant, but that is still not enough. As the credit cycle turns down, who is willing to make a bid? Who has the spare capital, and the guts to say, ‘This is the right time.’ Even if it will turn out all right in the end (the actuarial argument), I could lose my job, or get a lower bonus if I don’t time my purchases right. Hey, Actuary, do you want to increase your allocation to high yield at these levels?”

Actuary: “The ratings agencies have told us we only have limited room to do that. Besides, our CIO is a ‘fraidy cat; he wants his bonus in 2008. But in theory it would make sense to do so; we have a long liability structure. We should do it, but there are institutional constraints that fight the correct long-term decision.”

Nonlinear Dynamics Guy: “Okay, then, who does want to take more credit risk here?”

Derivatives Trader: “We are always net flat.”

CDO manager: “Can’t kick a deal out the door.”

Capital Structure Arb: “We’re doing a little more here, but our credit lines aren’t big. Some friends of mine that run credit hedge funds are finding that they can’t lever up as much during the crisis.”

The economist and the guy from the rating agency give blank stares. The Nonlinear Dynamics Guy says, “Look, high yield buyers took too much risk in the past, and now their ability to buy is impaired by increasing capital charges, and unwillingness to resist momentum. Now levered buyers of high yield credit have been killed, and there is excess supply at current levels. Rationality will return when unlevered and lightly levered buyers, or buyers with long liability structures (looks at the actuary) hold their nose, and step up and buy with real money, not short term debt.”

The actuary nods, and makes a mental note to discuss the idea with the CIO of the life insurance company. The economist and ratings agency guy both shrug. The CDO manager asks how long it will be before he can do his next deal. No one answers. The derivatives trader says “Whatever, I make my money in all markets” and the capital structure arb smiles and nods.

Nonlinear Dynamics Guy [NDG] says to the latter two, “Good for you. But what if your financing gets pulled? Many places are finding they can’t borrow as easily as they used to.” The two of them blink, grimace, and say “Our lines won’t get pulled.” Nonlinear Dynamics Guy says, “Have it your way. I hope you all do well.” At that the actuary smiles, and asks if NDG would be willing to speak at the next Society of Actuaries meeting. NDG hands him his card, and says, “Let’s talk about it later. Who knows, by the time of your meeting, things could be very different.”

On Information Cascades and Lemmings

On Information Cascades and Lemmings

I’ve never been comfortable with the concept of rationality in economics, at least, if rationality is defined as maximizing or minimizing a certain function, largely because maximizing and minimizing take effort, and people avoid effort (it is a bad not a good).? So when I read jive about information cascades, I roll my eyes.? Don’t get me wrong, I like Dr. Schiller; he’s a clever guy.? What is meant by information cascades is a sudden acknowledgment of things that were obvious, but ignored, because economic actors decided to follow the crowd.

Now, in the equity markets, momentum players can make money, but they have to cut their losses, and not stay at the game too long on any individual stock that is falling.? Houses are far less liquid than stocks, so the threshold to act is that much higher, plus for those that have mortgages, the leverage magnifies the pain when prices fall.? Thus people delay acting, and when they act, because a pain threshold has been crossed, they act all at once.

Is this an “information cascade?”? I think not.? It is more akin to “gunning the stops” in an equity market.? As prices fall, more people decide to sell to preserve some value, and prices go down more than anticipated.? It is not so much a question of information, but fear that drives the trade.

Information takes a different form.? Those who analyze their borrowings such that they know that it is unlikely that they will ever be forced to sell have genuine information.? They have sized their borrowings appropriately.? They are relying on the table model of stability, rather than the bicycle model (stable so long as you keep moving).

We don’t get dramatic moves in markets from information cascades, but from levered borrowers that are forced to sell for one reason or another.? These are borrowers that lacked information.? They became “informed” because of price moves that they did not anticipate.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira