Currencies

One Dozen Notes on Markets Around the World

Posted on 3 May 20084 May 2008 by David Merkel

1) Desperation and the Dollar. In mid-March, pessimism over the US economy and monetary policy were so thick that people were considering the old Greenspanian rate of 1% Fed funds as possible. Well, times change, at least for now. The orange line above is the 2-year Treasury yield which gives a fair read on expectations of monetary policy, which bottomed in mid-March. It took the Dollar a little longer to move along, but the present course of dollar is up in the short-term (consider the Euro). That doesn’t address the possibilities of a wider lending problem, or the overly aggressive fiscal policies that will be employed by the next President. (Deficits don’t matter, until they are big enough to matter.)

2) I’ve talked about the US Dollar and the five stages of grieving. I think the G7 got to the second stage, anger, in threatening action recently. I think they get a respite from fear because of the bounce in US monetary expectations. My guess is that they would intervene when the Dollar gets to $1.70/Euro. Neither the threats nor the intervention will have much impact in the long run, though. This will only change when foreigners stop buying our bonds, and start buying our goods and services.

3) Another thing that correlates with the shift in expectations of US monetary policy are yields in long government bonds around the world. Surprise, as the anticipated future financing rates rise, the willingness to try to clip a spread off of long bonds declines.

4) So what could replace the Dollar as the global reserve currency? The Euro, maybe? The Yen and Pound are too small, and everything else is smaller still. The Yuan might be ready in 15 years when their financial markets are developed. It takes a long time for the reserve currency to shift.

5) So, why not the Euro? I’m still a skeptic that the EU will hang together without political union. Also, a strong Euro is testing the monetary union in places where credit markets are weak, and export markets are weakening because the US is getting more competitive with the weak Dollar. That said a persistently weak dollar raises the incentives for other countries to look for a new reserve currency. Leaving aside the potential instability of the EU (unlikely in the short run) the Euro is probably the best alternative.

6) This piece by Felix Salmon helps point out why why Iceland is the canary in the coal mine. They are the smallest economy with a floating currency. It seems like they are successfully defending their currency at present, at the cost of 15% interest rates.

7) Is the UK economy just a miniature version of the US economy?

Cutting Central Bank lending rates
Bailout plans for the banks (and here)
Many homeowners with negative equity, and all of the problems that brings

8 ) Why is Chinese inflation rising? Loose monetary policy, and an undervalued Yuan, at least versus the Dollar. Now, maybe the Chinese will start buying Euro-denominated bonds, and sell more to the EU than they buy. (Note that I am not the only skeptic on the Euro’s survival.)

9) What of the Gulf States? What will they do with all of the dollars that they have? Along with China, their huge depreciating Dollar reserves are fueling inflation. Personally, if I were in their shoes, I would buy US corporations quietly, perhaps through the purchase of ETFs. But the huge accumulation of dollars threatens to create the same “white elephant” development schemes that they experienced in the early 80s, when the socialist Gulf governments had too many Dollars, and too few places to use them.

10) Inflation is rising in the OECD. This is a “sea change” in terms of economics. Policymakers have enjoyed falling inflation rates for so long that perhaps they aren’t ready for the degree of monetary tightening necessary to squeeze out inflation.

11) Development isn’t easy after a point. It reveals shortages, as India is experiencing in semi-skilled and skilled labor. This will eventually work out, but in the short run, it makes infrastructure and construction projects difficult. Bodies aren’t enough; skills are needed, and many better skilled Indians work abroad, where they can make more.

12) A rice cartel? Everything old is new again. I remember in the 1970s when the US talked about a wheat/corn cartel, in response to the new strength of OPEC. Personally, I don’t think it would be effective. Agriculture is too flexible for cartel-like schemes to work in the intermediate-term. But, let them try. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Is This What You Wanted?

Posted on 2 May 20082 May 2008 by David Merkel

In my blogging, in my other research and in investing, I gain some degree of comfort from being criticized by both bulls and bears. Worst of all would be no criticism; it would mean that I am not saying much. Criticism from both sides means that I am probably not blindly taking a partisan view, or talking my own book.

Briefly this evening, I want to point out some of the costs of our current monetary policies. Now, some things are going well, and the Fed might want to take some credit.? But the costs are soft costs, ones that are preferable to systemic financial collapse. That said, there are smarter and dumber ways to do bailouts. When I criticized the Bear Stearns bailout, I tried to point out how there have been better ways of doing bailouts from history, and that the Fed should have known this. I understand that the Fed may have felt rushed at the time, leading to a suboptimal decision, but they should be better read on economic history. Bailouts should be very painful for those bailed out, or else others line up for them.

Well, now that there has been one bailout, why not more? Other shaky areas of the economy could use a bailout… student lenders, homedebtors, home lenders, etc. Are they less worthy than Bear Stearns? Ignore the student lenders, because they pose little systemic risk. If housing prices fall another 20%, the systemic risk issues could be severe. Consider there two quotes from the article:

“There is no way to put the genie back in the bottle,” Minneapolis Fed President Gary Stern said in an interview with Fox Business Network on April 18. “What worries me most about where we wind up is that we will have an expansion of the safety net without adequate incentives to contain it.”

and

Richmond Fed chief Jeffrey Lacker and policy adviser Marvin Goodfriend wrote in a 1999 paper that central bank lending creates ever-expanding expectations. “The rate of incidence of financial distress that calls for central bank lending should tend to increase over time,” they wrote. That “creates a potentially severe moral-hazard problem.”

We’re on that slippery slope now. Should the Fed bend monetary policy even more to compensate for areas of lending where they have inadequate control? To the extent that you believe in central banking, central banks should deal with the big issues, and leave the little ones alone. Lend at a penalty rate during a crisis; don’t try to make things normal. Where there is systemic risk, stand behind the core but not the fringe; defend debt claims, and wipe out equity claims.

Or, consider the second order effects that our monetary policy creates: the weak dollar and the responses that foreign governments must follow: let their export sector wither, or follow US policy down, and accept more inflation. It will take a long time for the US to lose its reserve currency status, but we are on that path. Here’s to the day when we have to borrow in the currencies of oil exporters, or China. (Please no. 🙁 )

Or, consider the troubles that the states are in, since they have to run balanced budgets, unlike the Federal government, which can borrow in dollars, and inflate the currency as needed. I follow state tax revenues; it is an excellent coincident read on the economy. Well, sales tax revenues are falling. Also, some states are considering one of the “dumbest ideas ever” — pension bonds (borrowing to fund pension plans, relying on clever investing to beat the rate paid on the bonds). New Jersey lost big on their last attempt at pension bonds. Far better to consistently fund municipal pensions through general revenues. For those that have read me before on municipal pensions, their claim to fame is that they make private sector funding look good.

Finally, to end on a less sad note, is Iceland looking better, or , is it just part of an overall bear market rally?? (What of Argentina?) ? My guess is the latter, but maybe they have successfully defended their currency. Then again, we can look at Brazil, which is now investment grade on one side (from S&P). Good news follow good policies, and Brazil has been on the right track — they have become a net creditor, unlike the US. Hey, maybe the Real should be a reserve currency.

Still Too Early For Banks

Posted on 29 April 2008 by David Merkel

One thing about Jim Cramer, he is quotable.? Take this short bit from his piece, Graybeards Get It Wrong on Financials.

One of the loudest and most pervasive themes by a lot of the graybeards is that there is still much more pain ahead in the financials.Let me explain why that is wrong. First, the group is down from a year ago. It’s been hammered mercilessly.

More important, every time the stock market rallies is another chance for these companies to refinance.

Remember, as they go up, the companies are in shape to tap the equity market again because those who bought lower are being rewarded, psyching others to take a chance. In fact, other than the monoline insurance faux bailouts, people who pony up are doing pretty well.

Now, he might be right, and me wrong on this point (with my gray beard, though I am younger than he is).? But let me point out what has to go right for his forecast to be correct.

1) The inventory of vacant homes has to start declining.? Still rising for now, another new record.? Beyond that, you have a lot of what I call lurking sellers around, waiting to put more inventory out onto the market, if prices rise a little.? They will have to wait a while, and many will lose patience and sell anyway.? There is still to much debt financing our housing stock, and though most of the subprime shock is gone, much of the shock from other non-subprime ARMs that will reset remains.? Will prices drop from here by 20%?? I think it will be more like 12%, but if it is 20% there will be many more foreclosures, absent some change in foreclosure laws.? Foreclosures happen when a sale would result in a loss, and a negative life event hits — death, divorce, disaster, disability, and unemployment.

2) We still have to reconcile a lot of junk corporate debt issued from 2004-2007, much of which is quite weak.? Credit bear markets don’t end before you take a lot of junk defaults, and we have barely been nicked.? Yes, we have had a sharp rally in credit spreads over the last five weeks, but bear market rallies in credit are typically short, sharp, and common, keeping the shorts/underweighters on their toes.? You typically get several of them before the real turn comes.

3) We have not rationalized a significant amount of the excess synthetic leverage in the derivatives market.? With derivatives for every loser, there is a winner, but the question is how good the confidence in creditworthiness between the major investment banks remains.? Away from that, Wall Street will be less profitable for some time as securitization, and other leveraged businesses will recover slowly.

4) Credit statistics for the US consumer continue to deteriorate — if not the first lien mortgages, look at the stats on home equity loans, auto loans, and credit cards.? All are doing worse.

5) Weakness in the real economy is increasing as a result of consumer stress.? Will real GDP growth remain positive?? I have tended to be more bullish than most here, but the economy is looking weaker.? Let’s watch the next few months of data, and see what wanders in… I don’t see a sharp move down, but measured move into very low growth in 2008.

6) What does the Fed do?? Perhaps they can take a page from Cramer, and look at the progress from private repair of the financial system through equity and debt issuance.? It’s a start, at least.? But the Fed has increasingly encumbered is balance sheet with lower quality paper.? Two issues: a) if there are more lending market crises, the Fed can’t do a lot more — maybe an amount equal to what they have currently done.? b) What happens when they begin to collapse the added leverage?? Okay, so they won’t do it, unless demand goes slack… that still leaves the first issue.? There are limits to the balance sheet of the Fed.

Beyond that, the Fed faces a weak economy, and rising inflation.? Again, what does the Fed do?

7) Much of the inflation pressures are global in nature, and there is increasing unwillingness to buy dollar denominated fixed income assets.? The books have to balance — our current account deficit must be balanced by a capital account surplus; the question is at what level of the dollar do they start buying US goods and services, rather than bonds?

8 ) Oh, almost forgot — more weakness is coming in commercial real estate, and little of that effect has been felt by the investment banks yet.

As a result, I see a need for more capital raising at the investment banks, and more true equity in the capital raised.? Debt can help in the short run, but can leave the bank more vulnerable when losses come.? The investment banks need to delever more, and prepare for more losses arising from junk corporates and loans, housing related securities, and the weak consumer.

The US Dollar and the Limits of Irresponsibility

Posted on 19 April 200820 April 2008 by David Merkel

Promises, promises.? How many ways can the politicians dream up to spend money that they don’t have?? Perhaps it’s easy when you are the world’s reserve currency, and few argue with taking down IOUs denominated in US Dollars, at least for now.

But there are limits.? When looking at the US Dollar today the markets have kind of a benchmark that they use as their default scenario:

Fed funds will not drop below 1.5% at the bottom of this cycle.
CPI inflation will not rise above 5% for this cycle.
Nominal GDP growth will not drop below 4% for this cycle.
The US current account deficit will improve, albeit fitfully.
?Total Federal Debt will not grow faster than $600 billion per year.? (you didn’t know it was growing that fast, now did you? 😉 )

Of course, this is just my view, and I could be wrong.? But the US Dollar has gotten trashed, and in order for it to get hit further, the powers that be will have to exceed the current “Limits of Irresponsibility.”? As for the default scenario that I have laid out above, those are key parameters that I think are baked into the current low level of the US Dollar.? Violate those levels, get a lower Dollar.?? Get further away from those levels, and dollar could rally.

When I gave my talk to the Society of Actuaries, one of my recurring themes was, “It is wonderful to be the world’s reserve currency.”? Consider especially slide 32, where the weak dollar combined with strong overseas equity markets flattens out the net foreign assets to GDP ratio at near -20%.? We ship our losses overseas, and that isn’t counting all of the subordinated structured product that they bought… yet.

I am not a doom-and-gloomer by nature.? I try to recognize what is wrong, analyze what could be done to ameliorate the situation, and consider what could go right.? I am not an optimist on the US Dollar, though I don’t see how it falls much further from here.? There is room for the US Dollar to rally, if only a few things go less wrong.

In the long run, though, there are imbalances that the US needs to change, and the long run path of the Dollar will rely on those changes.? I believe that the markets embed an improvement in US policies long run; if that fails, we will continue to see the Dollar deteriorate.

Ten Things To Be Concerned About

Posted on 17 April 2008 by David Merkel

1)? Picking up on some comments from last night’s post, why I am I not concerned about counterparty exposure?? Because Wall Street has always been very good at cutting off overleveraged clients in the past.? LTCM was an exception there, and only because Wall Street gave in to their request for secrecy.? Wall Street grabs collateral first, and then lets the client argue to get it back.? The investment banks require a significant margin, and when there is significant concern about getting paid, the lines get pulled.

The real worry here is that the investment banks don’t have good enough risk controls for each other.? Note that Bear’s crisis started when other banks stopped extending credit to Bear, and the fear fed on itself.

I liken the investment banks to long-tail commercial casualty insurers.? No one knows whether the reserves are right.? No one can.? Confidence is a necessary part of the game, which is made easier at lower levels of leverage.? But high leverage and opaqueness are a recipe for disaster when volatility rises.

2) Should you worry about Fed policy?? Yes.? The Fed is steering away from the Scylla of a compromised financial sector, and into the Charybdis of inflation.? As I will point out later, that is already having impacts on the rest of the world.? As for now, there are a few ill-informed writers who say that a negative TIPS yield on the short end is a reason not to buy TIPS.? That might be correct if inflation mean-reverts.? Given the short-term resource scarcity building in our world, I don’t think that is likely.

3) Should you worry about the US Government budget deficit?? A little — oh, and worry about the real deficit, one that puts the wars and other emergency appropriations on-budget, and takes out the excess cash flow from Social Security.? In a macro sense, for the nation as a whole, the impact isn’t that great… but it sends a message to foreign creditors who wonder what the value of the dollars will be when they get paid back.? When they see the Fed running an aggressive monetary policy in the face of rising inflation and a weak dollar, it makes their heads spin, as they contemplate the hard choices the weak dollar forces on them.

4) Could the falling dollar cause a crisis in China?? Maybe.? China is levered to US growth, which is slowing, and their export competitiveness versus the US declines as the dollar declines.? And what will they do with all of those dollar reserves?? Beats me.? After a certain point, additional reserves are useless — it is akin to lending more to an entity that you know is insolvent.? My guess is that the yuan will get revalued after the Olympics, and then the real slowdown will hit China.

5)? What of foreign food riots; are they a worry?? (More, and more.)? A little.? They are a canary in the coal mine.? They point to the short-term scarcity of total resources in our world, which only becomes obvious as a large part of the world tries to develop.? But, one practical thing that it implies is that energy and food prices will remain high for some time.? We are one global market at present, and energy and food prices are interlinked through the energy and fertilizer costs of farmers, and through stupid ideas like corn-based ethanol.

6) What of flat crude oil? production?? Yes, worry.? As I have said before, the government oil companies of OPEC countries control most of the supply, but they don’t always manage their resources as well as a capitalistic oil company.? Mexico, Venezuela, and Russia have declining production, to name a few.? The Saudis may not want to produce more, because they don’t know what to do with all the US dollar reserves that they have today.? Or maybe they can’t…

7) Worry about falling housing prices?? Yes.? The problems in the housing market stem from overbuilding.? There are too many houses chasing too few solvent borrowers.? This will eventually affect prime mortgages, because declines of 15-20% in housing prices mean that many prime loans would be underwater in a sale.? Remember, an underwater loan becomes a default after a negative life event — unemployment, death, disability, divorce, and uninsured disaster.

Before all of this is done, one of the major mortgage insurers should fail.? We aren’t there yet.

8 ) What of falling residential real estate prices in foreign countries? Yes, worry.? For Europe, it could lead to the end of the Euro, as countries needing looser monetary policies get tempted to abandon the Euro.? If the Euro’s existence becomes questioned, it will be a systemic risk to the world.

9) What of credit card delinquencies?? Yes, worry.? It shows that total financial stress on the consumer is high, particularly when added to the problems in mortgage and home equity loans.

10) Should you worry about bank solvency?? A little.? All of these previously described stresses have some bearing on the ability of the banking system to make good on their obligations.? Be aware that the FDIC was designed to handle sporadic losses, not systemic crises.? The odds of these problems affecting the depositary financials is still low, but the protective measures will not be capable of dealing with the worst case scenario, should it arise.

Perhaps I have more to worry about.? As I close up here, I haven’t mentioned the PBGC, Medicare, and a variety of other problems.? But, I have to call it a night, and symmetry with last night’s piece is worth a little to me.

The US Dollar and the Five Stages of Grieving, Revisited

Posted on 12 April 200813 April 2008 by David Merkel

I recently received an e-mail from a reader regarding the post, The Problem with Hoarding, or, Don?t Play a Game with Someone Who Can Change the Rules. Here it is:

Why pick the year 2020 for a max? I like the previous post about the US Dollar and the 5 stages of grieving

That previous post was the one that first got me hooked on Aleph. Google found it for me when I was searching for some answers on what the heck was going on in the world.

Let me clarify. By 2020, I don’t think the US Dollar will be the world’s reserve currency. It may happen sooner than that. As for the five stages of grieving, that applies to the intermediate-term, and maybe the short-term. It certainly sounds like the G-7 is entering the stage of bargaining. If they decide to do a currency intervention, I hope they remember The Four Rules of Currency Intervention. It would save them money, whatever money is nowadays.

We are getting close to an inflection point here.? The pips are beginning to squeak.? Be ready for an intervention; and be prepared for it not to work, unless they follow the four rules.

The Problem with Hoarding, or, Don’t Play a Game with Someone Who Can Change the Rules

Posted on 12 April 2008 by David Merkel

US Dollar reserves continue to build up in the Middle East, China, and other parts of the world as well.? Good for them.? Isn’t it great that they have all of those foreign currency reserves to draw on?

Well, maybe. The question becomes who they sell the dollar assets to, and at what price.? When many nations hold an excess of dollar claims, more than they need for trade purposes, the desire to have more dollar claims declines.? Thus the dollar falls in value versus other currencies.? Eventually the day will come where US goods are irresistible, but we aren’t there yet.

And, we are putting out more dollar claims.? Witness the trade deficit and the record US government budget deficit (and that’s with Social Security on-budget, and the wars and other “emergencies” off-budget.? Let the rest of the world fund our spending by lending to us in depreciating dollars.

Well, that creates inflation in the US, with import price rises feeding that.? It feeds inflation in the countries that insist on keeping their currencies artificially cheap versus the dollar to subsidize their exporters.? It fees recession, or at least economic slowing. in nations that allow their currencies to rise to restrain inflation.

So, back to my title.? Hoarding US dollar reserves brings no advantage after a certain point, particularly when many are doing it.? There is nothing scarce about dollar claims.? Take the rest of the title: would you play a game with someone who can change the rules against you? Lending to the US in US Dollar terms is exactly that.? The US mouths a strong dollar policy while pursuing a weak dollar policy.? Who in the US government cares about the budget or trade deficits at present, enough to do something about them?? No one significant.? Both parties are spending like there is no tomorrow, out of a sense of financial crisis.

What will impose discipline on the system?? A falling US Dollar, and a lack of willingness for foreigners to accept payment in US Dollars.? Or, massive foreign demand to buy US companies, not debt.? Or, nations that stop subsidizing their exporters, because the inflation becomes too great, and allow their currencies to appreciate.? Maybe we see this in a few years, but certainly by 2020.

The Global View — Six Themes

Posted on 10 April 2008 by David Merkel

Though I write mainly about US economic and investment issues, I try to be think globally as I consider macroeconomics. I think that many economists are hobbled because they think about the US economy in a closed framework, neglecting the effects that the rest of the world has on the US. Prior to the end of the cold war, that was a useful shortcut, but now many aspects of the US economy depend on global, and less on local factors. (Some articles cited here will be dated, but are still relevant in my mind.)

This article is meant to take you through six themes affecting the global economy. Here goes:

China

I’ve been writing about neomercantilism and China now for almost five years. The negative effects are now obvious. Inflation has been rising in China, because too much credit is chasing too few goods. That inflation is funneling into US goods prices as well. China exports too much, and imports too little, which forces them to import US credit. This is getting tired, and the Chinese and Middle Eastern savings gluts need a new place to invest, or better, new goods to buy. Absent these adjustments, in order to cool the economy, the PBOC keeps raising reserve requirements again and again. Better they should revalue the yuan up 20%, or they will continue to import inflation from the US.

China has its growing pains amid this. Pollution is rampant, and standards for product safety are low. Beyond that, China now competes with the US and Europe for economic alliances in Africa. Given past bad blood there, the Chinese may at many points be better received, that is, until they abuse their welcome.

The main question here is the demise of “Bretton Woods II” where the rest of the world uses the US Dollar as the main reserve currency, while the US continues to debase the dollar through the issuance of more dollar claims. You can read about it in any of the following articles:

The end of the United States exorbitant privilege?
Imbalancing act
Has the moment come to replace the US dollar?
Jim Rogers: More Pain for the Greenback, and the Failure of the Federal Reserve (Now, I would argue with Jimmy Rogers over a number of his facts, but he has the main thrust correct.)

Now, Ken Fisher told us not to worry about the declining dollar, but the euro-yen exchange rate. It’s too early to say, but that exchange rate is flat, while the S&P 500 is off 7% or so. Perhaps the overall carry trade is weakening, but not with the euro as a currency to purchase, yet.

Finally, not only is the weak dollar good for exports, but for tourism as well. Now maybe they buy some of our slack houses as well…. please?

Inflation, Especially Food Prices

All the buzz is over rice, which has risen fivefold in six years. You can read about it here:

Now, that inflation is feeding back to the US, but slowly.? You would think that this would be a great time to eliminate US farm subsidies, but no, they are too effective at ~~buying votes~~ insuring economic stability in the Midwest.

Now, in the face of these inflationary pressures, the ECB is not mimicking the Fed.? They see the inflationary pressures, and aren’t loosening, at least not much.? Australia is even tightening.

Recession Fears in the Developed World

Now there are similar stresses in housing in some places of Europe, as compared to the US.? Consider Spain (and here), and the UK.? Low-ish interest rates can lead to overbuilding anywhere, if the regulators look the other way.? Japan may not have housing worries, but their growth is slowing, and they worry about the next recessionary leg of a what is proving to be a long recessionary era (since 1990).

Energy

It doesn’t matter how you slice it, Chavez has mismanaged the Venezuelan economy, and particularly the oil industry.? Now he is trying to do the same thing to cement.? Venezuelans are experiencing shortages and high inflation, as Chavez directs resources that he has ~~stolen~~ nationalized to his cronies and his foreign interests that he funds in order to make life difficult for US foreign policy in Latin America (not that I am a great fan of US policy there — I only recognize the conflict).

The Middle East has lots of new oil fields to tap at the right price, yes?? Well, I’m not so sure.? It is interesting to see the UAE develop a nuclear program.? Perhaps they are looking to a day when oil will not be so plentiful?? Then again, maybe we will have a big energy find in Greenland (an island that may once again be green, now that temperatures are rising to levels last seen in the middle ages).

Emerging Markets

Coming back to the beginning of the article, emerging markets (like China), are going through an adjustment period.? Since these two articles were written, emerging market equities have fallen significantly.? They may fall further; many of those nations are geared to global growth, and when it slows, it slows even more for them.? Many of them are absorbing US inflation as well, and need to raise their exchange rates.? That will hurt exports in the short run, but will aid in bringing economic stability.

Fourteen Notes on Monetary Policy

Posted on 8 April 2008 by David Merkel

This post is on current monetary policy. The review piece on how monetary policy works is yet to come.

1) Let’s start out with the regulatory issues to get them out of the way, beginning with Bear Stearns. To me, the most significant thing to come out of the “rescue” was the Federalizing of losses from the loans that were guaranteed by the Fed (something which I noted before had to be true, since the Fed turns over its profits to the Treasury), and the waiving of many leverage rules for the combined entity (also here and here). These in turn led to an attitude that if the Fed was going to lend to Bear (however indirectly), then they should be regulated by the Fed.

Now, I don’t blame the Fed for bailing out Bear, because they were “too interlinked to fail.” You could say, “Too big to fail,” but only if you measure big by the size of the derivatives book. The last thing that the investment banks needed was a worry on concentrated counterparty risk affecting the value of their derivative books.

That said, given that Jamie Dimon was very reluctant to help unless the Fed provided guarantees, and the low price paid, it indicates to me that Bear and the Fed were desperate to get a deal done. What was in it for Bear? I’m not sure, but the deal avoided greater ignominy for the board, and might preserve jobs at Bear for a longer period of time.

2) At a time like this, many cry for tighter regulation in the the intermediate-term and more aggressive actions in the short-term to restore liquidity. Forget that the two of these fight each other. Personally, I find the comments from the IMF amusing because they are an institution in search of a mission; the IMF was designed to help developing nations, not developed ones. The comments from the FDIC Chairwoman are good, but really, where were the banking regulators in 2005-2006, when something useful could have been done?

3) Does the Fed want to be a broader financial regulator? My initial guess would be “no,” but I could be wrong here. Part of my reasoning is that they have not used the powers effectively that they already have. Another part is that monetary policy has often been misused, and been pro-cyclical. With their new powers, they will still face significant noise and data lags. Why should they be more successful at a more complex task than they have been with the less complex task of monetary policy? Schiller is way too optimistic here. The central bankers are part of the problem here, not part of the solution. For years they provided too much liquidity in an effort to keep severe recessions from occurring, and in the process they removed fear from the financial system, and too much leverage and bad underwriting built up. Now the piper has to be paid.

4) Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, comments on the difficulties involved in effective regulation of financial institutions as a lender of last resort.? The Fed will have to build new models, and think in new paradigms.

5)? Charles Plosser, President of the Philadelphia Fed, tells us not to overestimate monetary policy.? Sage words, and rarely heard from the Fed (though in my experience, more often heard toward the end of a loosening cycle).? Plosser moves up a couple of notches in my view… monetary policy can deal with price inflation, and that’s about it.? Once we try to do more than that, the odds of making a mistake are significant.

6)? Who loses when the Fed loosens?? Savers.? They earn less; there is a net transfer of wealth from savers to borrowers.? Holders of US-dollar based fixed income assets also bear the brunt, if thy have to convert it back to their harder currency.

7)? Perhaps the TSLF is succeeding.

8 ) But perhaps all of the Fed’s efforts on the asset side are making it more difficult for Fed to keep the fed funds market stable.? I have one more graph that stems from my recent piece on the Fed:

Note that during the past six months, the low transaction on Fed funds was significantly below the effective rate.

9) VIX and More has latched onto this calculation of M3.? Given the changes and the adjustments that they have made, and the 20% or so rate of growth for M3, I would want to see a “spill” of the calculation to see what’s going on.? Perhaps there has been some double-counting.

Now, if we are talking about MZM (all monetary liabilities immediately redeemable at par) , we are facing high rates of growth — around 17% YOY.

My M3 proxy, total bank liabilities, is running ahead at a 13%+ rate.? Only the monetary base stays in the mud with barely 2% growth.? I still think that the Fed is trying to restrain inflation through no monetary base growth, while allowing the healthy banks to grow aggressively.? So much for supervision.

10)? Reading the H.4.1 report the past weeks have had the Fed lending more directly through their new programs, and selling Treasuries to keep the Fed’s balance sheet from growing.

11) I expect the minutes tomorrow to reveal little that is new; if anything, it will highlight the competing pressures that the Fed is trying to deal with.

12) For a view compatible with mine, read Bob Rodriguez of First Pacific Advisors.? One of my favorite equity managers, and he is doing well in the present environment.

13) The yield curve and Fed funds futures indicate another 25-50 basis points of easing in this cycle, at least, until the next institution blows up.

14) Finally, and just for fun — two guys I would nominate for the Federal Reserve Board — Ron Paul and James Grant.? Toss in Steven Hanke, and it starts to get interesting.

Shelter Fallout

Posted on 4 April 2008 by David Merkel

Though sometimes I do posts that are a melange of different items that have caught my attention, I do try when possible to gang them up under a common theme.I try not to do “linkfests” because I want my readers to get a little bit of interpretation from me, which they can then consider whether I know what I’m talking about or not. Anyway, tonight’s topic is housing. I didn’t get to my monetary policy 101 post this week — maybe next week. I do have three posts coming on Fed policy, credit markets, and international politics/economics. (As time permits, and ugh, I have to get my taxes done…. 🙁 )

1) The big question is how much further will housing prices fall, and when will the turn come. My guess is 2010 for the bottom, and a further compression of prices of 15% on average. Now there are views more pessimistic than that, but I can’t imagine that a 50% decline from the peak would not result in a depression-type scenario. (In that article, the UCLA projections are largely consistent with my views.) It is possible that we could overshoot to the downside. Markets do overshoot. At some level though, foreigners will find US housing attractive as vacation/flight homes. After all, with the declining dollar, it is even cheaper to them. Businesses will buy up homes as rentals, only to sell them late, during the next boom.
2) But, the reconciliation process goes on, and with it, losses have to go somewhere. In some cases, the banks in foreclosure refuse to take the title. Wow, I guess the municipality auctions it off in that case, but I could be wrong. Or, they let the non-paying borrowers stay. I guess the banks do triage, and decide what offers the most value to act on first, given constraints in the courts, and constraints in their own resources. Then again, developers can reconcile the prices of the land that they speculated on to acquire. In this case, cash is king, and the servant is the one that needs cash. I just wonder what it implies for the major homebuilders, with their incredible shrinking book values. Forget the minor homebuilders… Can one be worse off? Supposedly my father-in-law’s father lost it all in the great depression because he was doing home equity lending. There are wipeouts happening there today as well. Add in the articles about unused HELOC capacity getting terminated (happened to two friends of mine recently), and you can see how second-lien lending is shrinking at just the point that many would want it.

3) The reconciliation process goes on in other ways also. Consider PennyMac, as they look to acquire mortgage loans cheaply, restructure, and service them. Or, consider Fannie and Freddie, who are likely to raise more capital, and expand their market share (assuming guarantees don’t get the better of them). Or, consider the Fed, which has tilted the playing field against savers, and in favor of borrowers, particularly those with adjustable rate loans. No guarantee that the Fed can control LIBOR, though…

4) The reconciliation process steamrollers on. We’ve seen Bear Stearns get flattened trying to pick up one more nickel, and maybe Countrywide will get bought by Bank of America, but you also have banks with relatively large mortgage-lending platforms up for sale as well, like National City. Keycorp might bite, but I’ve seen Fifth Third rumors as well. Then there is UBS writing down their Alt-A book, along with a lot of other things.

5) A moment of silence for Triad Guaranty. A friend of mine said that they were the worst underwriter of the mortgage insurers. Seems that way now. Another friend of mine suggested that MGIC would survive off of their current capital raise. They stand a better chance than the others, but who can really tell, particularly if housing prices drop another 15%.

6) Beyond that, the financial guarantors have their problems. FGIC goes to junk at S&P. MBIA goes to AA at the operating companies, and single-A at the holding company at Fitch. I personally think that both MBIA and Ambac will get downgraded to AA by S&P and Moody’s. I also think that the market will live with it and not panic over it. That said, BHAC (Berky), Assured Guaranty, and FSA (Dexia) will get to write the new business, while the others are in semi-runoff.

7) Now for the cheap stuff. Amazing to see vacancy rates on office space in San Diego rising. I think it is a harbinger for the rest of the US.

8 ) Buy the home, take the copper, abandon the home, make a profit. Or, just steal the copper.

9) Bill Gross. A great bond manager, but overrated as a policy wonk. Many would like to see home prices rise, but others would like to buy a home at the right price. How do we justify discriminating against those who would like to buy a cheap house?

10) “The prudent will have to pay for the profligate.”? Well, yeah, that is much of life, in the short run.? In the long run, the prudent do better, absent aggressive socialism.? The habits of each lead to their rewards, and the ants eventually triumph over the grasshoppers.