The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Buy-and-Hold Can’t Die

Buy-and-Hold Can’t Die

There’s this mistaken idea trotting around in the popular media, which usually only shows its face in bear or sideways markets: buy-and-hold investing is dead. This is wrong in several ways:

1) The average investor is horrible at market timing.  They buy high and sell low.  The more volatile the asset subclass the more pronounced this behavior is.  I have witnessed this personally while analyzing the return differences for Bill Miller, Bruce Berkowitz, and the S&P 500 Spider.  There is a profound difference between the returns that a buy-and-hold investor receives, and that which the average investor receives.  The buy-and-hold investor almost always does better; the only exception that may exist are value investors who have learned to resist price trends, painful as that may be.

2) The assets of the market are far less volatile than those that trade them.  Bonds are issued, the grand majority of them mature (pay off).  Stocks are issued, and they pay dividends, get bought out, fail, spin off another company, etc.  Trading activity usually far exceeds the need for financing assets; it becomes a game unto itself, and a zero-to-negative-sum game at that.  When you are playing a game that is overall negative-sum, i.e., the brokers suck cash out of the game proportionate to trading, the better players look for quality assets, and trade less.

3) When a sustained bull market arrives, the other mistake will show up, “Buy-and-hold is the only way to go.”  Risky assets have periods of protracted increases in valuation.  Certainty in the continuation of the process grows as it gets closer to the end of the cycle, when the cash flows of the assets cannot support the cash flows of those who borrowed to buy them.

4) Longer-term investors are often the key to a turnaround in the price of an asset.  Asset prices bottom when longer-term investors see value, and buy-and-hold, waiting out the volatility.  Asset prices crest when long-term investors decide to sell-and-wait, because the prospective returns to a buy-and-hold investor are poor.

This is why the perspective of a value investor can be valuable in approaching markets… are you willing to do a cold hard analysis of the likely cash flows?  You know that it gets harder to maintain high returns on equity [ROEs] as time goes on, and the same for low ROEs — new management arrives, and there is mean-reversion.

Conclusion

Yes, there are clever traders, but by necessity they are few in the market ecosystem, and repeatability is uncertain.  There are far more dumb traders, and repeatability is only limited by their declining capital.  Then there are the value-oriented infrequent traders.  They do best, but second to them are those that buy-and-hold.

In general, the economy rewards those who bear risk over long periods of time.  Thus buy-and-hold does well, usually, over long periods of time.  That time period may be 30-40 years, and may not do well with respect to your retirement date, so take caution, and don’t trust in long-term investing as if it is the force of gravity.  It is more akin to one who realizes the bean farming has become unpopular, and so, he decides to plant beans.  It might not work immediately, but it stands a better chance of working than those who are chasing the current farming fad.






bloggerbuzzdeliciousdiggfacebookgooglelinkedinmyspacenetvibesnewsvineredditslashdotstumbleupontechnoratitwitteryahoo
Asset Allocation, Bonds, Portfolio Management, Stocks, Value Investing | RSS 2.0 |

18 Responses to Buy-and-Hold Can’t Die

  1. [...] Why buy-and-hold can’t die.  (Aleph Blog) [...]

    • SteveP says:

      I personally prefer to buy and hold because I did the trading thing and well let’s just say that it’s not for me. Trading caused me sleepless nights wondering what the Greeks or China might pull next to kill my plans of fortune. Buy and hold is simple and relaxing even boring at times but I sleep better and I spend less on commissions so I have more money working for me and less for the brokers pockets.

      Personally I believe it’s the commission hungry brokers who are the ones who are trying to kill the buy and hold strategy because it lends it self to less churning and thus fewer profits for them.
      Great blog you gained a reader in me.

  2. [...] Buy and Hold, like Jay Leno's career as the most unfunny human being alive, can never die.  (AlephBlog) [...]

  3. [...] $1,690/oz as euro slides – Reuters Insiders as bearish now as last April – MarketWatch Buy-and-Hold Can Not Die – The Aleph Blog ‘Peak Oil’ is back with a vengeance – Today Online [...]

  4. [...] Continue Reading This entry was posted in Assest Liability Management and tagged Asset Allocation, Bonds, Portfolio Management, Stocks, Value Investing. Bookmark the permalink. ← Interview: Patrick Burns Quantitative Finance in R [...]

  5. [...] alephblog.com – Tagged: Please Update Your Records View on Counterparties.com → Amazon.com Widgets [...]

  6. revelo says:

    >value-oriented infrequent traders. They do best,

    Absolutely. Benjamin Graham recognized this long ago. “Buying when the overall market is attractively priced is more than half the battle won already” or something of the sort. He didn’t discuss selling when the market is unattractively priced, though that this also important–and more difficult. The key is to remember that that stock prices tend to steadily grow in nominal terms (inflation + risk-free rate + risk premium), so you only want to sell-and-wait when prices get really crazy.

  7. [...] The Aleph BlogHelping Institutions and Ordinary People Invest Better by Focusing on Risk ControlBuy-and-Hold Can’t Die07MarBuy-and-Hold Can’t Die, ReduxWhen I wrote my piece last night, I did not write it to say one [...]

  8. [...] I wrote my piece last night, I did not write it to say one ought to buy and never sell.  In investing, I encourage the concept [...]

  9. [...] I wrote my piece last night, I did not write it to say one ought to buy and never sell.  In investing, I encourage the concept [...]

  10. [...] Merkel at the Aleph Blog in a couple of posts writes that the death of buy and hold is greatly exaggerated.  In his first [...]

  11. [...] Aleph Blog posted in a thought provoking article entitled “Buy and Hold Can’t Die”. There are clever traders. There are far more dumb traders, and repeatability is only limited by [...]

  12. [...] of Labor The fundamental question for the left Romney the Bizarrely Anti-Base Candidate Buy-and-Hold Can’t Die The End of Health Insurance as We know It? A Challenge to Rush: Prove Your Ratings Just An Idea: [...]

  13. [...] Why buy-and-hold can’t die.  (Aleph Blog) [...]

  14. [...] Reasons Buy-and-Hold Investing Is Not Dead – Alephblog.com Ytterligare en artikel på temat hur dåliga investerare är på att tajma marknaden. Vi köper [...]

  15. [...] The Aleph Blog – Buy-and-Hold Can’t Die [...]

Disclaimer


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.


Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.


Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs

InstantBull.com: Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst

Benzinga.com supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin