The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Book Review: The Snowball, Part Three

Book Review: The Snowball, Part Three


If you have to make it simple, Warren Buffett is in the compounding business. That is what he has done since he was a young boy. He started with selling gum. He moved on to working inside the family firm.

Once his father moved onto DC as an idealistic Congressman, Buffett had a paper route, and as his assets began to grow, he bought a farm and other assets.  He was always trying to grow his net worth.  That is a constant with Buffett – he has always tried to grow his net worth.

By the time he linked up with Ben Graham, there were still a lot of “cigar butts” to pick up and puff.  In that era compounding was easy because the post-depression competition was so low in stock-picking.

But by the late 1960s almost all of the ‘cigar butts” had been picked up and smoked.  Easy pickings were gone, and Buffett was saddled with an unproductive textile company – Berkshire Hathaway, and a mediocre-to-bad department store in Baltimore.

He decreased the activities of the textile company, and reinvested the free cash flows predominantly into insurance, including buying half of GEICO.

(As an aside, Buffett was not a great manager of insurance companies at the beginning, and even the middle.  His early companies had their issues.  Jack Byrne did well running GEICO, followed by Tony Nicely.  Buying Gen Re was a mistake, at least initially – he bought something so complex, and he assumed that all would be fine, setting himself up for losses in the derivative book, and also in the casualty book, where they were reinsuring losses to avoid accounting issues.)

Then came the era of investing permanent capital, where he bought the “sainted seven,” and they produced profits for him.  He made more money off his public equity investments in the era of the 80s & 90s, but in short order thereafter it shifted.  Berkshire Hathaway was no longer an investment company akin to a closed end fund or a business development company – it was a full-fledged conglomerate.  That’s how we should think of it today.  Berkshire Hathaway is a conglomerate that gets a lot of its funding from insurance premiums.

He occupies a unique niche in business.  He will acquire entire firms that are attractive to him, does not change their underlying culture, and rarely if ever sells them.  This appeals to entrepreneurs who built a unique culture, and love their employees.  They will sell to Buffett, because alternative acquirers very likely would destroy the employees and culture for the sake of short-term gain.  Buffett is focused on the long run, and is willing to let a subsidiary underperform for a while, before he sends in additional management to sort things out.

On Buffett’s Wisdom

Buffett has a tremendous memory. He knows all manner of statistics regarding industry, which informs him in his investment decisions.  That is one reason why he makes so many wise decisions.

But another area of Buffett’s wisdom was against the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.  Whether in his debate against Michael Jensen in 1984, which helped to produce the article, “The Superinvestors of Graham and Doddsville [PDF, 13 pages],” or in his annual shareholder letters, that risk is not volatility – risk is the permanent impairment of capital.

If you work with a margin of safety, and buy companies that will produce free cash flow, and can grow free cash flow, you will be safer than most investors, and probably more successful as well.

I’ll finish up this review tomorrow.

Book reviews | RSS 2.0 |

2 Responses to Book Review: The Snowball, Part Three

  1. bjdubbs says:

    What do you think about what Schroeder calls the “homeostatic” effect of the float?

    For instance, this:

    p. 395, Snowball by Alice Schroeder:

    “He was now [1974] very, very rich but cash poor. The companies he controlled, especially Berkshire, had cash to buy stocks, however. To move some of Berkshire’s money to Diversified [a retailing company owned by Buffett], Buffett set up a reinsurance company in Diversified.”

    So Diversified was a reinsurer of the Berkshire insurance company and therefore received premiums. Diversified would merge with Berkshire in 1978.

    “Buffett began to buy stocks for Diversified. Principally he followed the Wattles model and bought stock in Blue Chip and Berkshire. Soon, Diversified would own 10% of Berkshire. It was almost as if Berkshire was buying back its own stock — but not quite.”

    It’s hard to say how much this buying (and selling?) of Berkshire stock had on BRK results, but it continues to this day. The BNSF transaction resulted in the insurance company holding BRK stock, which certainly puts in the “buyback” announcements in a new light. BRK may simply reach from one pocket and buy shares from another pocket, same trousers.

    • That is a great question.

      It’s basically a method of increasing corporate leverage without making it obvious. I’ve seen it at a number of insurance companies in my life. The cash from the subsidiaries and the parent company exit through the purchase of the stock on the open market, raising the percentage of stock in the process. It is a hidden buyback.

      I have seen things like this at AIG, AXA, ICH/Pacific Standard (both went broke), and a number of other companies.

      Genworth has some issues here in the present. Good analysts always check the statutory filings of the insurers they analyze for affiliated party transactions.


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.

Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.

Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin