Many Will Not Retire; What About You?

 

Retirement.? A concept of the late 1800s to the present.? Easy to swallow when the population is growing rapidly.? Tough to do when populations are growing slowly, much less shrinking.? I would point you to two articles I have written:

With stock prices high and interest rates low, many people look at their portfolios and smile: high current market values.? But what would happen if you had to turn?it into income?? Interest rates are low.? Dividend yields, though better than the past, are still pretty low.? This is another place where total return blinds us to economic reality.? If market values have risen solely because people are desperate for yield, earnings, etc., and not because future productivity is likely to be far higher, the rise in asset values does not represent a rise in distributable cash flows, which is what investors truly need.

Think of this a different way, and ignore markets for a moment.? How do we take care of those that do not work in society?? Resources must be diverted from those that do work, directly or indirectly, or, we don’t take care of some that do not work.

Back to?markets: Social Security derives its ways of supporting those that no longer work from the wages of those that do work.? That’s one reason to watch the ratio of workers to retired.? When that ratio gets too low, the system won’t work, no matter what.? The same applies to Medicare.? With a population where growth is slowing, the ratio will get lower. If the working population is shrinking, there is no way that benefits for those retiring will be maintained.

Pensions tap a different sort of funding.? They tap the profit and debt servicing streams of corporations and other entities.? Indirectly, they sometimes tap the taxpayer, because of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which guarantees defined benefit pensions up to a limit.? There is no explicit taxpayer backstop, but in this era of bailouts, who can tell what will be guaranteed by the government in a crisis?

Current low interest rates imply that there aren?t a lot of highly productive projects yearning for capital.? This is a product of overly easy monetary policy that never let recessions clear away bad projects.? Low interest rates make future promises more expensive for defined benefit plans, and make it harder to accrue assets for defined contribution plans.

Do you have one million dollars socked away yet?? No?? Under optimistic assumptions, maybe you can earn 4% on your money without touching the principal.? That would give you $40,000/year pre-tax.? Add in Social Security, and maybe you can make things work.

If you want to give up liquidity, and any sort of estate for heirs, you could annuitize all or part of your assets, bringing your yield up 1-2%.? For whose who have less money, that could make things work.

That said, inflation could throw a monkey wrench into all of this.? Buying inflation protection knocks around 0.5% off yields.? But who knows how much the government will encourage or discourage inflation?? That is the leading open question at present.

Summary

So long as interest rates remain low, and asset values high relative to replacement cost, funding retirement will be an expensive proposition.? Not many will be able to do it.? As population growth slows, government entitlements will prove difficult to maintain at current levels.

As such, we should expect older people to work longer than their parents and grandparents did.? In many cases it will be ?Work till you die.?? The idea of retirement as a long vacation at the end of life will only be true for the well-off, a minority of the population.

And compared to prior history, that?s how it should be.? A comfortable retirement is an expensive proposition, and not something that can be given to everyone by government fiat.? The economy only has so much productivity; to the degree that retirees suck off resources, there is that much less to help the economy grow.

I write this as a 52-year old man.? I have opportunities ahead, but for most people in the Western nations, as demographics lead to older populations, economies will decline unless something comes to revive growth in population.

To those who are older, I say ?Be ready to work.?? To those who are younger I say, ?Plan and prepare, save, and figure out how to supplant the oldsters who occupy the positions you want to have.?

It?s not going to be easy over the next forty years.? But if it were easy, everyone could do it.? Instead, those who are prepared will do it.? And so my readers, get ready to do it.

4 thoughts on “Many Will Not Retire; What About You?

  1. So the average person expecting a pension works for about 45 years, give or take (roughly age 20 to age 65). And you are saying that retirement for most people is not a realistic scenario…

    What about public sector unions that expect to retire after goofing off for only 20 years? Is anyone outside the public sector actually gullible and naive enough to believe the folks at the DMV or public works actually work? They have shorter hours, better benefits, more smoking and bathroom breaks, and more vacation time than almost anyone in the private sector. And public sector productivity is an oxymoron.

    I am not disputing anything you wrote David, but I think it is unreasonable and foolish to ask anyone in the private sector to forgo retirement while the public sector expects a full retirement after a mere 20 years (promised by lying politicians, not the taxpayers).

    That is why California is collapsing. That is why Illinois and Michigan are collapsing (MI had a lot of help from the UAW that had similar unrealistic expectations).

    I think it should at least be mentioned that the baby boomer generation had savings rates of less than 2% during their prime earning years (age 45-65 give or take). The national savings rates for their parents generation was 7-8% — a savings rate four times higher than the boomers, even though their actuarial life expectancy was shorter.

    The baby boomers are going to get the retirement they did *NOT* bother to save for. Their empty (unfunded) promises to their public sector will be formally defaulted on (they already defaulted by not saving).

    Generations X, Y and milenials did not make pension promises, they do not get pensions — and in all too many cases they are underemployed or flat out unemployed.

    And guess what? Unemployed people do not have resources to fund other people’s retirements. So whatever the baby boomers saved, that’s all there is to distribute among the baby boomers.

    Ultimately, there is no free lunch — not even if some crook politician promises otherwise. We all get the retirement we saved for (or did not save for as the case may be).

    Well, Bernanke gets to retire on the backs of taxpayers and on the student debts of Princeton grads… that’s another story

  2. > Do you have one million dollars socked away yet? maybe you can earn 4% on your money ($40,000). Add in Social Security.

    I do not think so. Not if you think like a pol.

    Short on SS $? Choices:
    – Wealth tax (let’s tax that 1M).
    – Take all IRA, 401K, 403B, SEP, etc funds. Say that will make things equal, just trust us.
    – Means test SS. Must have net worth under 30K to receive SS.
    – Push retirement to 75 or 80.

    Some of this is in place today in a limited form. How is this any different from taking gold by force of law?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira