The Aleph Blog » Blog Archive » Classic: The Value of Financial Slack

Classic: The Value of Financial Slack

This was my first article published at RealMoney, in October 2003, I think on the 17th.


As investors go, I am a “singles hitter.”  I don’t get many investments where I more than double my money.  But I bat a high average when I invest.  One of the keys to this is insisting that the companies that I invest in possess “financial slack.”  Financial slack means that a company can make a few mistakes, and not get killed.  This is the equivalent of Ben Graham’s margin of safety.


If you run a portfolio with a small number of stocks, it is important to avoid companies that destroy your capital.  It is difficult to recover when your capital has been impaired.  A good defense allows the offense to play aggressively, without losing sleep at night.


The market is a cyclical beast, with cycles inside cycles.  The market has a cycle of its own, but industries have their cycles within the cycle of the market.  This is where I find my advantage in the market – analyzing industry cycles.  Industries go in and out of favor.  The time to buy a company in any industry is when it is out of favor; as a matter of risk control (and humility) the companies to buy when an industry is out of favor are those with financial slack.  If you are wrong about the industry, you won’t lose much; if you are right, the gains will be significant.


My example for today is the steel industry.  The steel industry is economically necessary for our world, but is in decline in the US.  The older integrated steel mills are inefficient compared to the mini-mills, and foreign competition.  The foreign firms have varying advantages – cheaper labor, and governmental subsidies, both implicit and explicit.


Understanding Cyclicals


Steel is a cyclical business that follows the pricing of steel.  This may sound obvious, but the finance textbooks teach us to look at companies in a mode that assumes constant earnings growth.  This is a rare condition in the real world, and non-existent with cyclical companies.  With a cyclical company, watching the pricing trends of the commodity produced is the most critical factor in short-run stock performance.  Longer-term, it comes down to:


  1. Buying industry leaders with impeccable balance sheets.
  2. Reasonable operating leverage – they should be profitable at the cycle trough
  3. Buying them when the industry is hated.  Buy them cheap.
  4. Only buy firms that use free cash flow at cycle peak in a way that prepares for the trough.


Point 1 comes down to size and financial leverage.  Points 2 and 4 suggest a corporate humility that arises from restraining the increase of productive capacity when times are good, and a willingness to invest when times are bad.


Point 3 is the hardest point.  In growth industries, P/E ratios are a reasonable measure for valuation.  In cyclical industries, P/B [price-to-book] and P/S [price-to-sales] ratios are more reasonable, because earnings are less stable and reliable.  With cyclical companies, P/E ratios are typically lowest at the cycle peak, when companies have peak earnings, and high-to-nonexistent P/E ratios at the cycle trough.


Other issues around steel


There are a number of structural problems around the steel industry.  Tariffs to protect US production prevent inefficient capacity from exiting the industry.  The hint of removal or increase of tariffs can move steel stocks markedly.  Second, labor unions have not figured out how deeply uncompetitive the US steel industry is.  Between total compensation costs and work rules, the unions help make many US steel uncompetitive.  Finally, pension liabilities are often large relative to the total capitalization of many steel companies.  It is no surprise that one of the key issues regarding emergence from bankruptcy in the steel industry involves reduction of pension benefits.


Conservative investors investing in the steel industry will look for companies that do not have large pension deficits, and companies that are non-union, or where the unions have made peace with management.  They will also look for companies that can exist without tariff protection.  (Perhaps politicians will realize one day that more jobs hinge on the use of steel, rather than its production, and eliminate tariffs because it preserves more jobs, but I doubt it.)




In my investing, in the past, I have made money on AK Steel [AKS], Algoma Steel (insolvent), and Nucor [NUE].  When steel prices were higher, low cost producers (at that time) like AK and Algoma did well.  Their main problem was their debt loads; a company that is operationally efficient still has to service its debts.  EBITDA is all very good if you are a bondholder, but stockholders need free cash flow – AK and Algoma had none of that as steel prices fell.


In this uncertain environment, I am invested in Nucor.  With little debt, a non-union workforce, and relatively low cost production, Nucor is an acceptable stock for conservative investors.  Nucor has been a consolidator of steel assets on the cheap amid the many bankruptcies that have plagued the sector.  When steel industry conditions normalize, they will earn a good return.  It has a strong focus on return on equity.  It should earn a about $1/share in the trough, and perhaps as much as $5/share at the peak.


But is it the right time to own Nucor?  Is it cheap enough?  I made my last purchase in the high 30s, and would purchase more there.  In the high 40s, I am a little more indifferent, because I would sell Nucor in the low 60s.  Given the normal level of profitability for Nucor, I view it as a buy below 1.3x book, and a sell at over 2x book.


An alternative


I do not have a position in POSCO [PKX], but am considering it for my portfolio at present.  POSCO, formerly Pohang Iron and Steel, is the third largest steel producer in the world.  It is based in South Korea, and is presently the lowest cost producer in the world.  Debt is low, and if you can trust Korean GAAP, it has earned consistent money for nine out of the last ten years.  It trades around its book value, and 7x 2004 earnings – very cheap, unless we get a new war on the Korean peninsula.


As with any investment, the risks must be weighed against the likely returns.  I have one Korean company in my portfolio.  Do I want to double my risk?  That is my main question on POSCO.  Absent that, I would rate it a buy for those who can tolerate the risks involved.

Classic, Portfolio Management, Stocks, Value Investing | RSS 2.0 |

2 Responses to Classic: The Value of Financial Slack

  1. elidrucker says:

    I understand your interest in PKX. However, it seems NUE is a sale at 2.14 p/b based on your rule of selling above 2x book. Are considering replacing NUE with PKX or in addition?


David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.

Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.

Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin