Category: Blog News

On RSS and Feedburner

On RSS and Feedburner

Hi Friends!? This post particularly applies to those that read me via RSS, which may be half of my readership when you consider all of the republishers of my work.? At present, Google has stopped working on Feedburner, and earning money from Feedburner, which currently handles most if not all of my RSS.

I’m planning on switching RSS away from Feedburner, because it is only a matter of time before it disappears.? So if you see your RSS feed go cold, come re-sign up for RSS at my site, and you will get to read my writings on your RSS reader as you have previously enjoyed.

Post 2100

Post 2100

Every 100 or so posts, I take a step back, and think about blogging itself.? Tonight I want to talk about advertising in blogging.

I now get about 75 requests per month asking:

  • Can I do a guest post at your blog? (There have never been guest posts, ever)
  • I want to place link ads at your blog (I tell them it has to be labelled advertising, I will not let my readers be deceived.? They go away.)
  • Some other advertising that I find objectionable for other reasons.

I write this blog to give something back to society in general.? My reputation is worth more to me than making money.? If I did not care about my reputation and wanted to make money, I would write a newsletter.? I’m a good enough writer, and clever enough with statistics that I could easily dupe people and make a lot of money, but I belong to Jesus Christ.? I can’t engage in the implicit fraud that many newsletter writers do.

maybe your ears are too tight

I sometimes send the above cartoon to the advertisers. Most think it is a funny rejection notice. ? I’ve worked hard to create a blog with credibility.? I will not sell it out for a few measly bucks on advertising, or allow for posts from substandard writers.? I won’t even do it for writers better than me.? This is my blog; it reflects me, with all the warts and wrinkles.

I know that I am an acquired taste, and that many things I write are not congenial to all of my readers, because I write about too many areas.? But I write to give something back, and fight against those who try to cheat investors, even if the thief is our government.

But thanks to all that read me.? I am grateful that you peel off time for me.? I don”t deserve it, but I will do my best for you.

Your friend,

David

Regarding RealMoney

Regarding RealMoney

I have some happy news regarding my writings at RealMoney.? Between readers who kept copies of what I wrote, and TheStreet.com republishing at the free site some of my best? pieces, I have regained one-third of the writings that are lost.

Now, if there are other readers who saved some of my RealMoney writings, please send them to me.? As it is, I will start republishing the two dozen classics that I have recovered starting next week.

And, I will ask TheStreet.com if there is any way to recover the old posts… if you have some influence there, let me know.? Thanks.

Six Years at the Aleph Blog!

Six Years at the Aleph Blog!

Thanks to all of my readers, whether you read me via RSS, e-mail, twitter, or natively at the website.? But I have a favor to ask… if you read me elsewhere, drop by the site every now and then, because not all of my commentary gets republished by those that reprint my work.? Also, not that we get a ton of comments at Aleph Blog, but I appreciate the quality of almost all of the comments we get here, even if I may disagree with some of them.? If you read me elsewhere and want to comment, come to Aleph Blog and do so, or, just e-mail me.

Now for a few housekeeping items.? 1) People sometimes ask me for books to help explain insurance stocks, and in the past I have pointed to my own writings, especially this one.? My flavors of insurance series helps also.? I’ve also pointed to works from the Society of Actuaries, Casualty Actuarial Society, LOMA, CPCU, and others.? But now, I think this piece could be useful to some readers.? It’s relatively comprehensive, and not that long.? It’s not the way I do it, but it is well thought out.? It suffers from the same problem as one using the models of Aswath Damodaran; it’s too detailed.? I can’t think of anyone that uses such a model — it is overkill.? But maybe readers could what I would do with such a model: boil it down into something simpler.

That is what I am trying to do with my current series on analyzing insurance stocks.? There are three or so more parts left to write, and I should get them out in coming months.

2) Some people ask me how they can read the articles in my Major Article List, and I wish I could read them too.? Trouble is, TheStreet.com has lost them.? They are there, maybe, somewhere in their computer systems, but since they changed the way that they named files, the links to most pre-2008 posts has been lost.

Now, if any of you think you have a way to find those posts, let me know.? There are pieces on that list that are gold, silver, and bronze.? I would at least like to get the gold ones back.

3) Sometime soon, I will create a small website for my business.? It will explain what I do for a living for those that might want me to manage money for them.? I will not link to it here; I try to keep a separation between the blog and my business.

4) I write about a lot of topics, and I tend to go in streaks on given topics.? It’s not what I intended when I started this, but I can understand why I have readers follow me and leave me.? My blog is consistent over a long period, but over intermediate periods it concentrates on one area, then another.

5) I’m not out of things to write about.? Here’s what I am planning for the future:

  • Completion of my work on a new asset pricing model
  • Completion of my “On Insurance Investing” series
  • More posts on the idiocy of US & Global macroeconomic policy
  • Buffett’s Shareholder Letter and Annual Report.? (Note: the letter gets more press, but the Annual Report has more substance.)
  • Commentary on new ideas from the CFA Institute… some good, some bad…
  • More commentary on investments that rip people off.
  • And more, I have a long list of ideas to write about, and many book reviews to publish

6) I would have never expected? it, but February 2013 was my highest readership level at the blog directly, despite the short month.? Thanks to all who read what I wrote.? I try to write good stuff; I do not aim to be controversial, though I know that some of my views are controversial.

7) When I started this six years ago, I would have never dreamed how much I would end up writing.? I thought I wrote a lot for RealMoney.? If anything, I have written four times as much per unit time, which means that as prolific as I was at RealMoney, I have written 4-10x as much here.? And it all started with an extended conversation with readers on Jim Cramer’s “blog,” which led me to do what I had resisted for two years — start my own blog.

As I have developed this blog, I now earn more than I did writing for RealMoney.? That’s not much, but every little bit helps.

8 ) You can’t believe how many people write me asking to do a guest post at my blog.? It happens about 15 times per month.? Then there are the scummy advertisers, who don’t want their advertisements to be labeled as such.? I have a strict policy that all advertising should be identified as such.? Why?? Because I never want to scam my readers.? When you come here, I want you to be comfortable that I am saying what I say for reasons of truth, not profit.? Profit is incidental here.? Truth is paramount.? I know how I could make this place more profitable, and I reject it because I would compromise my message.

9) I began with thanks to readers; I end there as well.? Truth, I treasure all of the emails giving me praise, but my internal response is “Wow, you’ve all been so great to me over the years.? It really gets to me, you know.? I hope I always make you proud.? That’s all.”? (What the Flash said to the citizens of Center City… yeah I know, a little dumb, but you had to see it.? Start it at 8 minutes.)

My main focus is on ethics in investing, and secondarily explaining how things work.? I hate seeing people ripped off by investment firms, or their dishonest governments.

I have no idea how long I will continue this blog, but I would love to do it as long as I live.

Sincerely your friend,

David

Seven Notes on Blogging and the Markets

Seven Notes on Blogging and the Markets

I need to catch up on a few things, so bear with me.? This might ramble.

1) Should I live and continue to write until mid-October of 2013, I will reach 10 years of investment writing.? I started writing for RealMoney in October 2003, and that changed my life.? Thanks to Cramer, because he created an organization that revolutionized financial media.? Former TST news writers occupy a wide number of top spots in many places in the financial press — it is astounding how much better financial news is today.? I am grateful to know many of them, some of whom would call me for help on occasion.

2) In a few more weeks, Aleph Blog will hit its sixth blogoversary.? Seems like minutes to me, but I have a lot more grey to prove that the time has passed.? I do want to note that much as I wrote at RealMoney, I have written far more here.? I have a problem though.? It seems that RealMoney has lost its ability to recover old posts pre-2008.? I would love to get copies of my old posts that are listed here.? If any of you know how to do that, please let me know.

3) Saturday night’s second article was hate me or love me in terms of responses.? There are no other writers at this site; the same flawed man writes them all.? My main point is that you need someone who acts like a fiduciary (whether they are a fiduciary or not) to tend to your assets.? Investment banks do use retail to lay off exposures that they do not want.

In any significant transaction, you want to know who is with you and who is not.? (This was true in the housing bubble, where many parties teamed up against buyers.)? For my clients, they know that over 50% of my net worth is on the line in the same portfolio that they have. (At present, over 70%.)? I have a lot of confidence in my ideas.? I eat my own cooking.

You want to invest in situations where there is alignment of incentives.? Are there brokers who are noble?? Yes.? But to use one, he needs to jump through extra hoops, because he is not under obligation to be a fiduciary.

4) 4+ years ago I wrote a piece called: Inflation for Goods Prices, Attempted Inflation for Housing-Related Assets, but Sorry, No Inflation for Wages.? Probably one of my longest titles… but that still seems to be the case today.? Fed policy inflates housing-related assets, gives some price inflation, but because labor is not scarce globally, wages are flattish.

5) I wrote this piece summarizing my views on the rating agencies.? I stand by it.? The rating agencies are not the problem.? Regulators are the problem.? They create the conditions where ratings are needed.? Ratings by their nature are opinions, they are not guarantees.? They can’t be otherwise, or else the rating agencies will have to become financial guaranty insurers, and charge far higher fees that will destroy financing for so many.

That’s why I think the lawsuits against the rating agencies will fail, again.? This is not to say the rating agencies were blameless, but it is very difficult to estimate future losses on any class of securities that has not ever gone though a failure cycle.

6) I believe in the conservation of liquidity: it can’t be created or destroyed, but it can be shifted.? My first example is stock price increments.? I think that the tick size is arbitrary, and a small tick size will favor small investors who are looking to buy small positions.? A large tick size will favor larger institutions that wait patiently to buy and sell.

7)? I believe in the conservation of liquidity in bigger ways also.? The Fed does not create liquidity, at least not in the sterilized? way that they do it presently.? But they can shift liquidity; who do the QE programs help?? The US Government and the GSE-backed mortgage market.? Liquidity has been shifted there, and away from everyone else.

That’s all for now.

On Financial Blogging

On Financial Blogging

Why do financial bloggers do what they do?? (I include in this economists and investors as well…)

Is it for fame?? Maybe for some, particularly at the top, for the most popular finance bloggers.? One nice thing about the financial blogosphere is that over enough time, it really does sort out who has a lot to say, and who doesn’t.? There have been a lot of promising bloggers that ran out of things to say.? I know that I look inside me each night, and I ask, “What burns inside me that I have to write about?”

Alas, there are things that burn, and things that merely smoulder.? Once a quarter, I return to what I wrote one year ago to highlight the best of what I wrote then.? To me, a year is enough time to look back and say, “Boy, was that a bomb.” or, “Well done, that was prescient.” or, “How could you have hit the Publish button on that?” or, “Classic wisdom for the ages.”? I don’t love everything I have written, but aside from one or two pieces, I don’t delete them.? I’m fallible; what should you expect, I am human. ;)? Therefore I err.

I don’t think of myself as one of the top financial bloggers.? I do think of myself as unique; that does not make me good/popular.? One difficulty of my blog is that I write on a wider number of topics than other blogs, and some of my views on macroeconomics, ethics, etc., will make me somewhat controversial.

Do financial bloggers write to further their own business interests?? Some do, some don’t.? I get a lot of people asking me to manage money for them — definitely the majority of my clients, but my main reason for writing is to give something back.? I’ve had a unique career, where I have worked in a wide number of environments.? I’ve seen more corners of the market than most people, but I admit that I’m not a specialist.? When I write about a narrow topic, in the back of my mind, I know that there are some out there who know it better than me.? It makes me be more careful, and limit what I say to what I know.

Do financial bloggers write to affect policy?? We can try, but I don’t think we ever get very far.? Even though I eventually talked with senior people at the SEC over money market funds, and was one of the eight bloggers that went to the first Treasury-blogger meeting — I think we don’t have much ability to affect policy, much as I might wish otherwise.? (That won’t stop me from trying, though.)

Do financial bloggers write to vent frustration over dumb economic policy?? You bet, though there are many that don’t care for policy; they just trade, and I don’t blame them.? For those think of me as a buy-and-hold investor, you would have been amazed to see me as a corporate bond manager 2001-2003.? I traded & traded.? I could feel the pulse of speculation in the market.? I would say at that time, the two hardest things to do are to buy higher, and sell lower.

Back to dumb economic policy — that’s an area where we are kind of a sideshow.? We argue among each other, but we don’t accomplish that much.? My main complaint is economic indebtedness, and the need to reduce that globally.? But the powers that be favor increased indebtedness because it has little short-run cost, even if the long-run cost is significant.? We are short-sighted.

Do financial bloggers write to give something back?? I do, and I think many bloggers do.? Sometimes I think we are the conscience of Wall Street.? Personally, I think it is important to have a strong ethical slant in financial blogging, but aside from policy issues, I think few financial bloggers do.

Do financial bloggers want to learn from each other, and make more money?? In general, yes.? Most economists would be excluded here; they are mostly required to not be practical, and live in a world where maximizing robots dwell, and not people.

But sharing trading ideas, and conversing about market trends can be valuable.? I can’t say that I have gotten many micro ideas from financial bloggers, but I have gotten macro ideas that have shaped my views of the markets.

Do financial bloggers write to have fun? Yes, though that’s not why I write.? I write to give something back, but I have fun in the process.? When I read many of the financial bloggers out there, I sense that they are having a lot of fun as they put forth opinions.? If I could get them to Baltimore, I would love to host a party for all of them.? It would be a blast to have a lot of sharp people trade ideas with one another face-to-face.

So why do we write?? For many reasons, and most of them noble.? After all, why blog if you could write a newsletter and make money?? Because we want people to read our opinions for free, benefit from them, and better the world generally.

“This is Only Entertainment”

“This is Only Entertainment”

This is not meant to be a rant, but it may end up as one.? Yes, I have a disclaimer at my blog.? We all need disclaimers.? My disclaimer focuses on the idea that even bright people may make severe mistakes, and that the best of us only hand out educated guesses.

I can respect ideas like that.? What I don’t respect is language that says that “the following is entertainment.”? Entertainment?!? Who are you kidding?!? Few read investment analyses for entertainment, particularly when you are discussing a few securities that the author thinks could be profitable.? Yes, I can see them lining up at the Theaters, waiting? to watch the latest “Incredible Investment Idea,” on the big screen.

I can respect people who say, “This is my opinion,” and then when it doesn’t work out, I don’t blame them.? Everyone has opinions that are wrong, including all of the best investors.

But to say that investment writing can be for entertainment is ridiculous.? First, it is not entertaining.? Second, it often implies actions to be taken — few return from entertainment saying they ought to do something.

Look, I have made mistakes in the past.? This current post possibly contains mistakes.? I will make mistakes in the future, unless I die after this is written.

We have to accept the idea that what most people, even professional sell-side analysts write, is mere opinion.? That said, as a best practice, as I did at RealMoney, and from day one at Aleph Blog, I disclose all of my interests when I write a piece.

My main point is this: investment writing is not entertainment.? Disclaimers should be improved to reflect that opinions that might be wrong are being offered.

On Watchlists

On Watchlists

Before I start this evening, a quick story:

One day in March, I got an e-mail from an older gentleman, and he said, “Hi, my name is XXXXXX.? Please call me.”? The name sounded familiar but I couldn’t place it.? So I called him, and he asked, “I own a decent amount of Berkshire Hathaway.? Can you explain to me why the value of the put options Buffett sold have risen from 3Q11 to 4Q11?”? After talking to him for a little bit, he said, “So you really don’t know.”? I replied, “Yes, I don’t really know, but give me a couple of hours, and I can give you a decent answer.”? So I told him I would give him an answer via e-mail, and follow with hardcopy.? As it was, we were both wrong, the value of the put options had fallen.

But then it hit me why the name was familiar — he was one of the Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville.? You never know where you might go, or who you might meet just because you write some obscure blog.? Oh, yeah, you might just get to go to the US Treasury, and meet you-know-who. 😉

And now a question from a reader:

I?ve learned a lot from your blog. Thanks for the effort you put in to maintain it. (Today?s post was great? was just listening to my Intelligent Investor CD while driving last night and was thinking about how Graham talks about the need to be businesslike when investing).

I had a question about your investing process, specifically how you track stocks that look interesting to you.

For instance, I use value line and I flip through the pages on a daily basis, jotting down interesting tickers in a notebook. I then go to a few scans and watchlists, again jotting down tickers I?d like to research further. After that, I take my list of tickers and do some brief research to determine if they should go on my watchlist. This is where I need to change a few things. I use Morningstar to track my watchlists, which is great because it keeps track of all of the financial data automatically, but the problem is that as my watchlist grows, I find certain cheap stocks on the list but I can?t recall why I put them there. There is no spot for notes on Morningstar?s watchlist, so I thought about using a google spreadsheet, but I really don?t want two different things to track.

Walter Schloss was famous for not owning a computer and simply flipping through value line. There must be a simpler way to track stocks that look interesting!

Just wondering if you could share any thoughts on how you track potential stocks and how you refine your watchlist if it starts to get too large. Thanks David.

I don’t have a permanent watchlist.? I generate ideas three ways:

1) I read a lot of articles.? When an idea sounds clever, I write it on a small piece of paper and set it in a pile to age.

2) I study industries more than companies, and look for strong companies in weak industries, and levered companies in industries that are likely to remain strong for awhile.? I use Value Line here, and screen for companies that might yield a 15%/year return, while being above average in terms of balance sheet strength.

3) I read through the 13Ds of a group of ~75 investors that I respect, and look at the companies that are large holdings relative to market cap that are still being acquired.

Then I take all of my ideas once per quarter, shortly after the 13Ds are filed, and compare them against existing portfolio holdings against a variety of valuation metrics, sentiment variables, and other factors.

I then rank all of the companies as a group, looking at where the middle company in my existing portfolio is.? Companies I don’t own that are above it are candidates for purchase.? Companies I own that are below the middle portfolio company are candidates for sale.

I then sit down and analyze, and pair off stocks to sell versus stocks to buy, unless there is some reason to increase or decrease the number of stocks in the portfolio, which is usually around 35.? Presently it is 34.? I? buy/sell 2-3 stocks per quarter.? That keeps things fresh, but allows me to hold companies for longer periods of time.? (My turnover is 25% of the open end mutual fund industry.)

After I make my series of buys and sells, I throw all my work away, and start accumulating data for the next quarter.

My sense is that it pays more to think of your portfolio versus candidates than to track candidates.

The main idea here is that we should always be improving the character/quality of the portfolio.? Trade things that are worse for things that are better.? Human beings can do that trade.? What is hard is for people to assemble the best stocks.? Getting a bunch of “pretty good” stocks can be done, and it does not mean they will outperform all the time.? Getting a portfolio of all of the best stocks is impossible.

So think economically — try to improve your portfolio regularly, regular incremental improvements yield a large economic improvement over a market cycle.? At least, that has been my experience. 🙂

Post 2000

Post 2000

This has been a lot of fun.? This has been a lot of work.? This has been a “labor of love.”

When I wrote for RealMoney, I would sometimes say to my editor Gretchen, “Here’s another labor of love piece,” to which she would give a hearty response, because she liked editing me.? She told me she always learned a lot from me.? I liked working with her a lot.

Unlike some writers at RealMoney, I would sometimes troll through the comments on Cramer’s blog.? Sometimes I would defend him, at minimum I would try to explain him.

At the time, there were some financial blogs that I liked a lot — Jeff Miller, Barry Ritholtz, Roger Nusbaum, Steven Randy Waldman, Eddy Elfenbein, Alea… I know there are more, but I can’t remember now.? I resisted starting a blog for 1-2 years, because I felt RealMoney was my blog.? I especially liked participating in the Columnist’s Conversation.? (Note: if RealMoney would like to invite me back, I am open to the idea.? That said, the CFA Institute has encouraged me to blog for them as well — just don’t know how much content I can produce, because everyone wants original content.)

But I realized that RealMoney and I had different goals, and in talking with some of those that commented at Cramer’s blog, I decided to launch Aleph Blog.? Why call it Aleph Blog?? Many reasons, as noted in the link, but part of the fun was getting to read Borges, who I had not previously read.

When I launched Aleph Blog, I had no idea what I was getting into, and I did not intend on leaving RealMoney.? I liked the editorial freedom, though, and liked the broader interaction with many voices across the internet, rather than only RealMoney columnists, good as they were.? I did research when I started, and so I created my own domain, signed up with Seeking Alpha, and launched just prior to the mini-crisis where the Chinese stock market crashed in Shanghai.? When that happened, I wrote a popular piece that Seeking Alpha picked up that my friend Cody Willard promoted as well.

And off we went!? A grand experiment, allowing me to spread my wings more wide than at RealMoney.? My goal was to do a brain dump of areas where I thought I had competence.? I didn’t want to be like many bloggers where over 50% of their post is quoting others — I wanted to write from my heart, expressing my views on a wide number of topics relating to economics, finance and investment, from my unusual framework, which is Evangelical Christian, mostly libertarian (but not for financials), actuarial, value investor, doubting neoclassical economics and modern portfolio theory.

I was recently at a Baltimore CFA Society meeting, when a few people came up to me telling me how much they liked my blog.? Some quoted to me recent pieces I had written.? This was new; I was surprised.? I have never had local people come to me and say that.? Yes, stats for Maryland on my blog are above average, but my work helping the local CFA Society always seemed to be detached from other things that I do.? My worlds are merging, maybe.

My worlds are also merging from the many evangelical Christians who write to me.? This is a blog written by a Christian, not a Christian blog.? I’m here to serve everyone, but my views on ethics will color all that I write.

At the beginning, I tried focused linkfests, where I drew together posts on a hot topic, and narrated them to give my thoughts.? Those were a lot of work.? Today, my linkfests occur through Twitter.

Twitter: it took me even more pain to decide to do Twitter.? Given that my blogging is more long-form than most — why should I do Twitter?!? My answer for today is simple: to have good conversations, and push good content to readers.? And, for those who don’t do Twitter, they can read my weekly sorted tweets.? I got the idea from History Squared, a newer blog that I like.? Sorting the tweets makes them more useful to readers, so if it takes half an hour to do so each week, it is worth it.

But now I have more followers on Twitter than on RSS.? 6000 vs 5300.? I prefer RSS because people see the whole post, but I understand how the lower bandwidth on Twitter allows people to choose what attracts them.? Twitter makes us all epigram writers in AOL-ese.? It is challenging to do, but I like a good challenge.

I’ve written a number of series that have been significant:

I’m sure there are more, but I can’t think of them now.? At the same Baltimore CFA Society meeting as mentioned before, one person asked me, “How do you write about the wide variety of topics that you do?”

Part of it is my varied career, and educational background.? I have worked in a large number of areas, and have not been afraid to branch out and try things slightly outside my grasp.? You only learn when you fail.? I’ve learned a lot. I’ve failed a lot.

If you don’t take reasonable chances, you won’t grow.? Look for opportunities to expand your abilities — who can tell where you will go?!? Opportunities go to those who are there, grab hold of them, and win.? If you don’t try, you won’t win.

I know that my blog is an acquired taste, and best for professionals and advanced amateurs.? If you are a beginner, best you should focus on my personal finance category.

My goal has been to give something back to my readers.? I’ve had an interesting career, with many unusual and entertaining experiences.? I don’t have to have more fame or clients.? I enjoy relating the truths of the markets to others, whether they are beautiful or ugly.

To my readers: I don’t know if I will last another thousand posts, but I appreciate that you read me, eclectic as I am.? The one thing I promise: I will do my best for you, poor as that may be.

Your Servant,

David

PS — I know that my views on Fed policy and economics will win me few friends, but someone has to point out that the paradigm is broken.? Same for Modern Portfolio Theory….

 

Stuffing & Thanksgiving

Stuffing & Thanksgiving

Some of my readers might know that one of my hobbies is cooking.? Today I cooked a 24-pound Turkey, 4-pounds of Roast Beef, made gravies for both, mashed potatoes, mulled apple cider, toffee and stuffing, for a gathering of 25 at my house, who brought other foods (salads, some pies).? My kids made pies, Watergate salad, and fudge.? My wife got the day off, which is actually pretty normal at our house, because homeschooling the remaining four kids takes up her time.? The kids and I cook.

One family at the meal has given up on wheat, because of gluten.? They don’t have the celiac disease, but they say they feel better without it.? The pie crusts, aside from one brave attempt to use rice flour, were the only wheat in the meal. (Note: gluten makes a lot of foods possible.? It holds things together.)

But that gave me a challenge: wheat-free stuffing.? Now, my wife has a rule that she employs for when company visits: “Never serve anything that you have never tried before.”? I don’t follow that rule.? I have a different rule: “Taste. Adjust. Repeat as needed.”? I have enough tricks up my sleeve, that if something is not working, I can usually fix it.? Cooking is fairly intuitive for me; I can usually figure out what is needed to make the dish sing.

But I had never run into a stuffing recipe that did not contain *some* wheat.? After all, most cornbread recipes contain wheat.? But when I saw this recipe, and thought it through, I realized that I could create a non-wheat stuffing recipe that would taste very similar to a traditional Thanksgiving stuffing.? So here’s the recipe:

Ingredients

  • 1 cup (250 ml) butter
  • 2 cups (500 ml) cornmeal
  • 6 cups (750 ml) milk
  • 4 large eggs
  • 2 tsp (30 ml) salt
  • 1 tsp (15 ml) sugar
  • 2 tsp (30 ml) baking powder
  • 2 medium onions
  • 2 stalks of celery
  • 6 chicken bouillon cubes
  • 1 tbl (45 ml) parsley (dried is fine for the spices)
  • 1 tsp (15 ml) sage
  • 1 tsp (15 ml) rosemary
  • 1 tsp (15 ml) thyme
  • butter to grease casserole dish

Procedure

  1. Preheat oven to 350?F (175?C)
  2. Melt butter in a pot on medium heat.
  3. Chop celery & onion and add to the pot.? Cook until softened.
  4. Add cornmeal. Stir mixture to warm up the cornmeal.
  5. Add milk and bouillon cubes. Stir until mixture has thickened.
  6. Add parsley, sage, rosemary and thyme.
  7. Beat eggs. Beat in salt, sugar, and baking powder.
  8. Slowly add some of the thickened cornmeal mixture to the egg mixture while mixing to temper the eggs.? (Note: Do not add the egg mixture to the cornmeal. Some of the eggs will cook on impact resulting in streaks of cooked eggs and a heavier stuffing.)
  9. Stir the egg mixture into the rest of the cornmeal.
  10. Pour the mixture into a greased 9×13 inch casserole dish
  11. Bake at 350?F (175?C) for 30 minutes or until the top has browned

A fusion of two dishes, never tried before, and it was a hit.? Everyone liked it. Note that the amounts on the spices are approximations — I added the spices by hand, not spoon. “Taste. Adjust. Repeat as needed.”

So, for those that want to have stuffing, but can’t have wheat, this could be a good alternative.

=-=–=-=-=-=–=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=–=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

There’s something more to say this evening.? My wife came to me after talking with a neighbor who is having difficulties at work because of a tough boss.? In my own life, I have had my share of good and bad bosses, so I can sympathize.

In this environment, the first thing is to be thankful that you have a job.? Second, if you have a good boss, be very thankful.? A good boss is often worth more than a higher salary.? I learned more from my good bosses than those that were negligent.

And, if you are a boss, consider how you can better teach and motivate your subordinates.? I was working for the guy who I regard as my “best boss,” when he came in and said “Sorry, David, you drew the short straw, and now you have to oversee YYY.”? YYY was a problem employee who was quite bright as a programmer.? He was slow to get work done.? I sensed that he was bored.? Being more of a programmer at that time, I had some sympathy for him — eventually, my thought was, “How can I make his work more interesting?”? The commercial internet was still waiting to be born, and so I suggested the concept of setting up a “bulletin board” that could be accessed via dialup for our pension clients to use.

That caught his attention, and not only did he throw himself into that project, but he did all of his more “boring” projects well also.

I’m not good with people, but I did turn around one problem employee.

Back to my main point: if you have a job be grateful, but if you have a good boss, be more grateful.

From the Merkel house: blessings to all of my readers, not only now, but always and ever.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira