Search Results for: problems compound interest

Sorted Weekly Tweets

Companies

  • Intel shares slid in late trading after the chipmaker gave a dire forecast for the current quarter https://t.co/hClfp9Y1C9  $INTC lost its way in the 2000s, and did not respond effectively to changes in new chip designs & uses. Most of my computers don’t have Intel chips. Jan 27, 2023
  • The rate of returns at U.S. retailers more than doubled last year from 2019. What are the best ways for companies to deal with this flood? https://t.co/nTbNIGFKam  Well-written article. Makes perfect sense. Jan 27, 2023
  • The legacy of Jack Welch lives on as forced rankings endure despite controversy https://t.co/KDR5e2EYxM  It’s true that putting constraints on surveys makes them more accurate on average, but the effect on culture is bad because it harms teamwork. Jan 27, 2023
  • Elon Musk is upending the way that Twitter works. Ella Irwin is in charge of making his impulses a reality. https://t.co/9B2KrhbjNv  This will eventually result in lawsuits and laws limiting Twitter. Self-regulation is the best defense against external regulation Jan 27, 2023
  • When you can’t speak to the manager — or anyone https://t.co/B23satO6kM  In the short-run it saves money not having a call center. In the long run you lose customer loyalty, and don’t get feedback on how to improve. Jan 26, 2023
  • It takes an enormous amount of processing power to keep ChatGPT running https://t.co/tCtpfQ3aLh  So OpenAI stays near $MSFT — it minimizes their costs Jan 26, 2023
  • Giving four months’ notice or paying to quit has workers at a health-care company feeling trapped https://t.co/mfYdvI5P8s  If training is specific to the company, it benefits the company, so the laborer does not benefit, and should repay. Opposite for general skills Jan 26, 2023
  • Heard on the Street: Johnson & Johnson’s consumer business was the only division to deliver growth in the fourth quarter https://t.co/AjchC9YOkO  Surely they could have come up with a better name than Kenvue? Jan 25, 2023
  • Crypto companies seeking to go public over the past year have faced increased scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission https://t.co/e5Bod8Y4jp  Highly speculative companies get more scrutiny. Jan 24, 2023
  • Twitter is being sued for allegedly not paying the rent on its headquarters, adding to the legal battles between the social-media company and vendors since Elon Musk took over https://t.co/uAtdtLWBzT  Elon likes to see what he can get away with. You can’t cut your way to greatness Jan 24, 2023
  • Allstate plans to tap the pool of recently fired tech workers to help the insurer overhaul its business https://t.co/Jtc6c76qx6  Most IT developers would find most insurers to be pretty stifling. In all the insurance firms I worked, only one division of one company got IT right. Jan 23, 2023

Market Structure Issues

  • Meet the 11 ordinary twenty-somethings with $250 billion riding on their lives https://t.co/l69SlZqLwC  This is bizarre. Sometime between 2070 and 2110, this will have to be restructured $SPY Jan 27, 2023
  • Heading into Tuesday, a NYSE employee failed to properly shut down a disaster-recovery system — leading to a disaster https://t.co/ZUFpA84Eag  If you always trade with limit orders, this wouldn’t be a big deal. Market orders are risky. Jan 26, 2023
  • About 9% of outstanding US leveraged loans tied to Libor have no successor listed, but businesses may use extensions past the June 30 phaseout deadline https://t.co/Qr9PdTxJQp  Five months left on the grand experiment. Will SOFR be able to absorb the stress and hedging? Jan 26, 2023
  • Wall Street firms that help issue ABS wouldn’t be able to bet against those products under a Securities and Exchange Commission plan https://t.co/kfi4j40i6Y  Sometimes dealers sell bonds to clients via shorting as a service to clients that wanted more. Is that disallowed? Jan 26, 2023
  • Private companies desperate for cash as economic conditions sour are cutting confidential deals to avoid a dreaded down round https://t.co/cPbAL1K7GK  Kicking the can down the road, or, living to play for another day? Jan 25, 2023
  • Josh Kushner is richer than Donald Trump after billionaires back his investment firm. https://t.co/38CuybHp7I  be careful of measuring wealth off of small financing rounds, or stocks with small floats. Jan 25, 2023
  • Question of using term SOFR for ABS remains unresolved in 2023 https://t.co/hU1QhKLfVC  Lenders want predictability, even if there is some amount of basis risk — thus the desire for term rather than floating. This should get ironed out through futures markets. #LIBORwasbetter Jan 25, 2023
  • A Depression-era backstop that Wall Street banks use for short-term funding is the latest corner of traditional finance to be ensnared by upheaval in the crypto industry https://t.co/IEnVkbTpoq  The Federal gov’t has too many entities that lend money, guarantee, etc. Jan 25, 2023
  • A chaotic open for some stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange sent chills across Wall Street, leaving some investors frustrated and others clamoring for an explanation https://t.co/81wbDOjyrV  I had two stocks halted. No big deal. Wait a little, and markets were normal. Jan 24, 2023
  • The last time hedge funds and asset managers were this split on the future for benchmark Treasuries was when the Fed’s tightening cycle was about to peak in late 2018 https://t.co/0R3k0DViL7  Usually the guys that are levered up lose Jan 23, 2023

India

  • India’s integration into the global economy means the next big scandal may well be London or Singapore, rather than Mumbai, @andymukherjee70 writes https://t.co/iuLYhx1a8m  Much as the SEC has its weaknesses, isn’t the Securities and Exchange Board of India considerably worse? Jan 27, 2023
  • Talk of cronyism misses the point. If Adani didn’t exist, the Indian government would have had to invent him in order to fulfill its development ambitions https://t.co/rxffQ1B6uW  Relying on “big men” to run businesses is dangerous to any economy. It’s one reason India stays poor Jan 27, 2023
  • India’s Adani slammed by $48 bln stock rout, putting share sale at risk https://t.co/OvQLXRe2sz  Complex holding company structures with lots of debt are inherently fragile, dependent on liquidity being easily available. Jan 27, 2023
  • “Largest Con in Corporate History?” Nate Anderson’s Hindenburg is betting on it as the firm targets Asia’s richest person Gautam Adani https://t.co/ss3SZwlpVC  Any complex company that compounds at too high of a rate for its industries is suspicious. Think of Enron. Jan 26, 2023
  • India’s Adani Group explores legal action against US investor Hindenburg Research after its report accused firms owned by billionaire Gautam Adani of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud https://t.co/FtdOdF9GhZ  Fighting short-sellers is often a sign of weakness Jan 26, 2023
  • Adani Group’s shares fall after Hindenburg Research issued a report and said it had taken a short position in the company https://t.co/qT29MJsgZf  Conglomerate, price rise too rapid, lots of debt –> too much risk. Jan 26, 2023
  • “India is on the cusp of huge change.” How soon can a country once synonymous with red tape become a $10 trillion economy? https://t.co/PlD05lJ2S9  This isn’t likely. India has deep cultural problems that hinder them from developing. India is an empire more than a nation. Jan 23, 2023
  • From soap to paint, optimism for a harvest-led revival is laced with nervousness about urban spending https://t.co/0r1WHEABFN  Among other problems, “India’s software-exports industry — a large employer in metropolises — has become wary of hiring because of slowing global growth.” Jan 23, 2023

Portfolio Management

  • Happy 30th birthday to the ETF* https://t.co/m1hGrVswFV  Nathan Most, the man who changed the structure of fund investing by creating $SPY. Jan 27, 2023
  • The Buck Stops Here https://t.co/ukhvcQG0nt  Worth considering. The US has outperformed for a long time, and the US Dollar is weakening as the Fed decelerates Jan 26, 2023
  • Vanguard’s 10-Year Equity Outlook https://t.co/SjTITqtoqg  All the non-US equity estimates are at least 3%/yr too high, commodities & non-US could be accurate. Jan 26, 2023
  • ChatGPT was asked to create a market-beating ETF. Turns out AI has a long way to go https://t.co/kMJB59xPJc  ChatGPT is remarkably humble. Jan 26, 2023
  • Adding to that, bond ladders are the all-weather strategy for handling all aspects of interest rate risk. https://t.co/7ggbuMnL0q  Jan 25, 2023
  • Beware: even cash and bonds can land you in a fix https://t.co/tjEGYtnD1Z  A good introduction to the concept of reinvestment risk. In this environment, you get a higher yield by investing short, but when the bond matures, will you get a good yield to reinvest at? Jan 25, 2023
  • This Changes Everything for Hedge Fund Managers https://t.co/Uj4vuyEKcl  ‘“The higher the cost of money, the lower the competition,” says Avenue Capital’s Marc Lasry on the risk-free rate.’ You have to be more selective as to who can afford the high interest rate Jan 25, 2023
  • Why Invest in Stocks When Bond Yields Are Higher? by @awealthofcs https://t.co/DxUb55SwmD  Probably the only ones buying long bonds at the rates peak in 1981 were those that had to defease/hedge long liabilities. Everyone else was too scared. So life insurers, DB pensions… Jan 25, 2023
  • The Bank of England warned that life insurers are taking an “optimistic” view of how easily they could ditch assets in tough times https://t.co/Wk4gHZp8Mr  Depends on how big the positions are relative to the market, & sadly, the article does not give that stat. Jan 23, 2023

Fraud

  • $4 Billion Accounting Scandal Exposes Supplier Finance Risks https://t.co/TpXAL3MToM  Caldor returns! Jan 27, 2023
  • Crypto Speculators Are Betting On Ethereum’s Shanghai Upgrade Risks https://t.co/LM0ndJEhyJ  Ask where the yield comes from. These strategies blew up in 2022, and will do so again in 2023-4. Jan 27, 2023
  • What the poet, playboy and prophet of bubbles can still teach us https://t.co/qQu5XrPyGH  How Charles Mackay, author of “Extraordinary ­Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds” described bubbles, but couldn’t see the biggest one of his time: railroad securities. Jan 26, 2023
  • The Getty Family’s Trust Issues https://t.co/KkeXoSFnnn  Very long. I knew half of this, and it reinforces two of my beliefs: tax all income types equally, and abolish all tax deferral. Jan 25, 2023
  • Digital-asset wallet linked to one of crypto’s biggest hacks has moved over $150 million of stolen funds to tap a trade involving a derivative of Ether https://t.co/2F69VAZahc  From crypto news today, remember that security is always weakest at endpoints, where transfers are made Jan 24, 2023
  • Spyware that can turn even the most secure of phones into surveillance devices has become affordable enough that lawmakers are starting to do something about it https://t.co/yEy28x3oon  Is there really no way to scan for these zero click hacks? Jan 24, 2023
  • Thinking of buying crypto on the dip? @LionelRALaurent suggests you take note of authorities’ accelerating crackdown https://t.co/2dX3L3FbB3  No social value to crypto, aside from ransoming yourself from authoritarian regimes Jan 23, 2023

Energy

  • Scientists Are Turning Abandoned Mines Into Gravity Batteries https://t.co/PoAugP2e3Z  Physical batteries have a lot of advantages Jan 27, 2023
  • Man-made graphite isn’t very green, so battery makers want the mined, natural mineral. The problem is there isn’t enough. https://t.co/7yQesrsNHf  “It’s the largest raw material in the battery.” Though not the most expensive… it can be synthesized if mines can’t produce enough Jan 25, 2023
  • This giant underground battery is a $1-billion clean energy solution https://t.co/6Wg88Q7SqW  Compressed air drives a turbine when power is needed. Clean, right? No one would argue against this? Wrong. Jan 25, 2023
  • Construction of wind and solar installations has slowed to a crawl in the US, despite billions of dollars in federal tax credits and investor enthusiasm for clean-energy projects https://t.co/yxrYY84yWR  When many want to do the same thing, bottlenecks appear & delay ensues Jan 24, 2023
  • Nuclear reactors are being pushed to operate for more than double their intended lifespans. It’s a risky experiment with global consequences https://t.co/JtYhXZEWbB  Choices, choices — do the maintenance well. Schedule downtime. Jan 24, 2023
  • An increasing number of wind turbine malfunctions are indicative of green power’s growing pains https://t.co/RJLwfqIW20  There is probably a limit to how large you can make turbines without smallish flaws cascading into large failures. Jan 23, 2023

CMBS / CRE

  • Office Dominates New Transfers as CMBS Special Servicing Declines in December https://t.co/DyFCFkzQGO  One year ago, I bet the owners did not think rates would get this high. Jan 25, 2023
  • Refinancing Tough as CMBS Maturities Pile Up in New York City https://t.co/EJrmmDrDEA  Facing the end, of extend, and pretend. Jan 25, 2023
  • CMBS Realized Losses Increased in December https://t.co/ToWWYtZkPt  Interesting. Many of the losses took 5+ years to work out. The biggest loss took over 10 years, with 100% severity. Jan 25, 2023
  • Expiring Interest Rate Caps to Fuel Distressed Property Sales https://t.co/jZyDmEP7Jx  Will your rents cover higher financing costs? Jan 25, 2023
  • $9B plunge in NYC commercial real estate sets up brutal political fight over shrinking tax pie https://t.co/x27iLbUJqc  Not so many office buildings are needed as before Jan 25, 2023
  • Surge In ODCE Fund Withdrawals Is Another Worrying Sign for Commercial Real Estate – https://t.co/VlYRaEtnvP  You will get money… just not as much as you would like, nor as quickly. Jan 25, 2023

Non-US

  • Brazil and Argentina’s presidents have launched discussions on a common currency, but their plans are nothing like the euro, which replaced national currencies like the lira, franc and deutsche mark entirely https://t.co/O2LZY7UWXb  Much ado about nothing. Jan 26, 2023
  • Countries with established auto industries have been blindsided by China, which is poised to become the world’s No. 2 car exporter https://t.co/HpomO1RNmH  China does not lack for labor. Odd to promote a capital-intensive industry Jan 26, 2023
  • Zimbabwe’s leader seeks investment for a new capital just down the road from an impoverished and overcrowded Harare https://t.co/aGxTgu773Y  Better to focus on improving agriculture & infrastructure for public well-being. The Saudis may have money for folderol, Zimbabwe doesn’t Jan 26, 2023
  • The UK faces a brutal reality: either taxes are raised, free NHS services are cut, other government departments are effectively scrapped — or the health service breaks https://t.co/k2vS4P6TK9  If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it is free Jan 24, 2023
  • The on-off talks are back on again: Brazil and Argentina Are Discussing Whether to Combine Currencies https://t.co/XEDcxjHXGN  Would likely fail. Argentina can’t peg to anything given its lousy economic policies. A euro-like currency fails if much of the zone runs large deficits Jan 23, 2023

Personal Finance

  • Only one in three Americans can comfortably cover a $400 emergency expense, according to new survey data https://t.co/EWpFVnxe4q  Make good choices when you are young, apply yourself to school and work, and don’t overspend. Jan 24, 2023
  • Couples often grow more alike over time in their approach to spending, saving and risk, researchers say https://t.co/ag4MfeMC3b  Opposites can work if communication is good, or if one party lets the other do it. Otherwise it can be a disaster. Jan 24, 2023
  • The trouble with ‘buy now, pay later’ https://t.co/ZnEhIhILnD  People forget the 1920s, where BNPL was common and it led many into bankruptcy. Those who ignore history are fated to repeat it. Jan 23, 2023
  • Used car prices drop 12pc but bargains a long way off https://t.co/q0s8tZ9w6C  Yes, used car prices have fallen, but they are not cheap yet. Jan 23, 2023

US Economy

  • Seven Signs That Economic Growth Is Starting to Falter https://t.co/UkiMH7p2Eo  Mostly employment, retail, and low-end consumer credit Jan 25, 2023
  • Employers are shedding temporary workers at a fast rate, a sign that broader job losses could be on the horizon https://t.co/oBZIbci9tj  Labor markets may be weakening. Jan 24, 2023
  • The pride of central bankers has taken a battering as inflation has soared. But they need to prioritize growth over restoring their dented credibility https://t.co/3pfEivyJTQ  The inverted yield curve is the markets telling the FOMC “your forecasts of inflation are wrong.” Jan 24, 2023

US Politics

  • U.S. weapons industry isn’t prepared for a China conflict, a report says https://t.co/7no7A9cZqE  Will defense spending be a priority or not? What allies are you willing to give up on? Jan 25, 2023
  • Democratic congressman Khanna says Biden administration might have to take unilateral action to head off US debt default https://t.co/MBz3DDAvWz  Gimmicks might affect acctg, but never the real economy. We need to stop running primary deficits & then all deficits to avoid crisis Jan 24, 2023
  • The Biden administration’s analysis of the tax code by race is in. It shows White Americans disproportionately gaining from lower rates on capital gains and dividends https://t.co/wf5qjfddGr  This isn’t about race, but class. That said, tax all income equally. Jan 23, 2023

Odds & Ends

  • The Duck Brigade Behind a Farmer’s Plentiful Rice Harvest @atlasobscura https://t.co/yV9IupsDg3  The ducks eat the weeds. At the end of the season, people eat rice and ducks. Jan 27, 2023
  • “We are not out of drought in California, but this certainly makes a significant dent,” said Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources https://t.co/hWv12RqjE6  That there are far fewer farmers than before also makes a dent in water demand. Jan 27, 2023
  • Transcript: What the Heck Is Going on With Egg Prices “Let’s crack open the story.” https://t.co/32vZBDCrQc  From the avian flu to feed costs to holiday demand Jan 25, 2023
  • Getting a divorce in Japan is relatively simple. But it can sometimes result in single-parent custody, leaving one parent largely excluded from a child’s life https://t.co/p0efdka5eN  If you want to get sad, read this. Jan 24, 2023
  • New Paper Says Crypto Is Just A Hot Ball of Momentum-Chasing Money https://t.co/1kD0RxVDH8  So are Ponzi schemes Jan 24, 2023
  • Earth’s inner core may have reversed its rotation, potentially shortening the length of the day by a fraction of a millisecond over the course of a year https://t.co/UwtynNMmgk  Uncertain hypotheses Jan 24, 2023
  • Steelmaking is a major source of planet-warming emissions. A group of British scientists have come up with a way to avoid them. https://t.co/fkR7F76rr2  Cheaper, too — could be interesting. How prevalent is perovskite? Jan 24, 2023

Separate Processes

Photo Credit: atramos || Inflation isn’t the most organized phenomenon, and investors often all want to be on the same side of the boat…

I have a very irregular series called, “Problems with Constant Compound Interest.” Part of the idea of that series is that it is difficult to assure growth in capital in any sort of constant way. The simple models of the CFPs, and even actuaries that assume constant or near constant growth are ultimately doomed to fail if they try to exceed growth in nominal GDP by more than 2%/year.

Because of the oddities in the current market environment, current interest rates and inflation have decoupled. They are separate processes. We all want to build value in real (inflation-adjusted) terms, but how do you do that in an environment where price to free cash flow multiples are sky high, nominal interest rates are low, and the prices of most commodities are high as well (leaving aside gold as an oddity). Mindless stock bulls talk of TINA [There Is No Alternative (to buying stocks)], as if there is no limit to how high stock prices can go when interest rates are low. I want to tell you about TIN. There Is Nothing (worth buying). This is the nature of financial repression.

If you invest in short bonds, you get gouged by current inflation. If you buy long bonds, you run the risk that the Fed might start monetizing Treasury debt directly, and inflation really runs. With stocks you run the risk of any hiccup in the global economy (when is the omega variant coming so that we can move on to Hebrew letters?) can derail the market, particularly if it leads to higher interest rates.

The Fed has gotten its wish and is forcing an asset bubble on the US to aid growth, however fitfully. All of the relationships of the present to the future are out of whack, because interest rates are too low. But if intermediate interest rates rose to the level of nominal GDP growth, we would see deficits grow even more rapidly as the US government would refinance at higher rates. The Fed is stuck in a doom loop of its own design ever since Alan Greenspan got the great idea to cut short recessions too soon. That has led us into a liquidity trap designed by the Fed.

As I said to one of my clients this week (a bright man), “If you are not bewildered, you are not thinking.” About the only idea I can think of for investing at present is the intersection of high quality and low-ish valuations. As it says in Ecclesiastes 11:2 “Give a serving to seven, and also to eight, For you do not know what evil will be on the earth.” Diversify among safe-ish investments, with a few cyclicals that will do well if things run hot, and stable businesses, if things do not.

That’s all.

Limits

Photo Credit: David Lofink || Most things in life have limits, the challenge is knowing where they are

I was at a conference a month ago, and I found myself disagreeing with a presenter who worked for a second tier ETF provider. The topic was something like “Ten trends in asset management for the next ten years.” The thought that ran through my mind was “Every existing trendy idea will continue. These ideas never run into resistance or capacity limits. If some is good, more is better. Typical linear thinking.”

Most permanent trends follow a logistic curve. Some people call it an S-curve. As a trend progresses, there are more people who see the trend, but fewer new people to hop onto the trend. It looks like exponential growth initially, but stops because as Alexander the Great said, “There are no more worlds left to conquer.”

Even then, not every trend goes as far as promoters would think, and sometimes trends reverse. Not everyone cares for a given investment idea, product or service. Some give it up after they have tried it.

These are reasons why I wrote the Problems with Constant Compound Interest series. No tree grows to the sky. Time and chance happen to all men. Thousand year floods happen every 50 years or so, and in clumps. We know a lot less than we think we do when it comes to quantitative finance. Without a doubt, the math is correct — trouble is, it applies to a world a lot more boring than this one.

I have said that the ES portion of ESG is a fad. Yet, it has seemingly been well-accepted, and has supposedly provided excess returns. Some of the historical returns may just be backtest bias. But the realized returns could stem from the voting machine aspect of the market. Those getting there first following ESG analyses pushed up prices. The weighing machine comes later, and if the cash flow yields are insufficient, the excess returns will vaporize.

In this environment, I see three very potent limits that affect the markets. The first one is negative interest rates. There is no good evidence that negative interest rates stimulate economic growth. Ask those in nations with negative interest rates how much it has helped their stock markets. Negative interest rates help the most creditworthy (who don’t borrow much), and governments (which are known for reducing the marginal productivity of capital).

It is more likely that negative rates lead people to save more because they won’t earn anything on their money — ergo, saving acts in an ancient mold — it’s just storage, as I said on my piece On Negative Interest Rates.

Negative interest rates are a good example of what happens you ignore limits — it doesn’t lead to prosperity. It inhibits capital formation.

Another limit is that stock prices have a harder time climbing as they draw closer to the boundary where they discount zero returns for the next ten years. That level for the S&P 500 is around 3840 at present. To match the all time low for future returns, that level would be 4250 at present.

Here’s another few limits to consider. We have a record amount of debt rated BBB. We also have a record amount of debt rated below BBB. Nonfinancial corporations have been the biggest borrowers as far as private entities go since the financial crisis. In 2008, nonfinancial corporations were one of the few areas of strength that the bond markets had.

One rule of thumb that bond managers use if they are unconstrained is that the area of the bond market that will have the worst returns is the one that has grown the most during the most recent bull part of the cycle. To the extent that it is possible, I think it is wise to upgrade corporate creditworthiness now… and that applies to bonds AND stocks.

Of course, the other place where the debt has grown is governments. The financial crisis led them to substitute public for private debt in an effort to stimulate their economies. The question that I wonder about, and still do not have a good answer for is what will happen in a fiat money world to overleveraged governments.

Everything depends on the policies that they pursue. Will the deflate — favoring the rich, or inflate, favoring the poor? No one knows for sure, though the odds should favor the rich over the poor. There is the unfounded bias that the Fed botched it in the Great Depression, but that is the bias of the poor versus the rich. The rich want to see the debt claims honored, and don’t care what happens to anyone else. The Fed did what the rich wanted in the Great Depression. Should you expect anything different now? I don’t.

As such, the limits of government stimulus are becoming evident. The economic recovery since the financial crisis is long and shallow. The rich benefit a lot, and wages hardly rise. Additional debt does not benefit the economy much at all. We should be skeptical of politicians who want to borrow more, which means all of them.

One of the greatest limits that exists is that of defined benefit pension plans vainly trying to outperform the rate that their risky assets are expected to earn. They are way above the level expected for the next ten years, which is less than 3%. Watch the crisis unfold over the next 15 years.

Finally, consider the continued speculation that shorts equity volatility. You would think that after the disaster that happened in 2018 that shorting volatility would have been abandoned, but no. The short volatility trade is back, bigger and badder than ever. Watch out for when it blows up.

Summary

Be ready for the market decline when it comes. It may begin with a blowout with equity volatility, but continue with a retreat from risky stocks that offer low prospective returns.

How Much Should I Spend?

Photo Credit: 401(K) 2012 || As that great moral philosopher George Harrison once sang: “It’s gonna take a lotta money, a whole lot of spending money…”

Here is a comment from a reader on my last post:

Hello David. Fellow actuary here. I usually love your posts. I disagree with this one. Or at least I disagree with the title. ?How much (or how little) should I spend?? may have matched the content better.
I?d love to read your thoughts on ?When have I saved enough so that I may now outspend my income?? Perhaps you have written such a post but I don?t recall it.

Thanks for your great content!

https://alephblog.com/2019/10/16/how-much-should-i-save/#comment-37283

Yeah, I get it. Here are four posts that describe my view on spending money:

My main idea is encouraging spending that supports the well-being of the household in the long-run. I am trying to encourage a balanced point of view, which is the hardest thing to do. For many people it is easier to convince them to do just one simple thing than try to balance two or more unaligned goals.

That is why the “stoplight rule” is so useful. It is minimal, but balances saving and spending. Imagine telling a friend to enjoy life, but not too much, such that he compromises the future. The stoplight rule is a real help.

People have a hard time expanding their time horizons. It is easiest to live for the present, and hardest to live for retirement. The good of the present is tangible, whereas the good of the future is intangible.

I do not favor excessive savings. It usually leads to a trail of tears in relationships. God wants life to be enjoyed, because it honors the way he provides for us. God is not a miser; we should not be misers either.

As I said in the post Don?t be a Miser in Retirement (Or Ever):

The author of?the?book that I most recently reviewed, Carlos Sera,?gave one of his sayings on page 97 of his book:


?There is a fine line between over-saving and under-living.?

That particular story dealt with a couple that had been especially frugal, and after not earning all that much, at retirement had $6 million. ?They had a traditional marriage, and the husband handled the money entirely. ?He worked until 72, retired due to incapacity, and on the day of his retirement, he handed his wife a check for $3 million.

She thought it was a joke, so for fun she tried to cash the check. ?To her surprise, the check cleared. ?Then came the bigger surprise ? her amazement gave way to anger! ?All the years of self-denial, and they were this well-off! ?There were so many things she denied herself along the way, and now both of them were too old to truly enjoy their riches.
There?s more to the story? the point the author goes for is mostly abut how husbands and wives should learn to cooperate on the shared tasks of household economic management, so that both are on the same page, and they can be agreed on goals and methods.

I agree with that, and would add that the best approach on spending versus saving is what I would call a conservative version of the ?middle way.? ?Make sure that you are provident, but balance that with contentment and a happy enjoyment of what you have. ?Life is meant to be lived.

Yes, it is good to be prudent and frugal, but not to the point where you amass a lot of assets and never enjoy them.

https://alephblog.com/2015/11/03/dont-be-a-miser-in-retirement-or-ever/

I sometimes say in certain charitable contributions “What is the point of money if I can’t enjoy it being spent to a good purpose?”

Yes. There are some tiny-minded people who believe that “the one with the most toys at death wins.” These are people who want to delude themselves that selfishness is what is right, which is ridiculous.

If you are well off, God does not want you to be a miser. First, he wants you to honor Him. After that, he wants you to take care of your charitable obligations to society. After that, he wants you to enjoy what you have.

And that’s what I do, Lord helping me. I am sparing on optional items, but I take care of my home, the church, and other opportunities for charity that are in front of me. After that I relax, because I wait for other needs to be big enough to deal with.

The Best of the Aleph Blog, Part 41

The Best of the Aleph Blog, Part 41

Photo Credit: Renaud Camus

=========================

In my view, these were my best posts written between February 2017 and April 2017:

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (6)

It is very difficult to get a high real rate of return over a long time.? This article peels apart the math, and brings out the quantitative factors that play a role in the analysis.

Yield = Poison (3)

When the yield premiums for taking most forms of additional risk are too low, it’s time to take much less risk, and reduce yield considerably.

Streaking Into the Record Books?

Remember the streak of days where the market did not go down by 1% or more?? It ended and did not set a record, but it was a top 10 long streak.

We Get New Highs More Frequently After New Highs

Dog bites man, but I have never seen an analysis like this done before.

Everyone Needs Good Advice

On the value of having someone financially smart to whom you can ask questions

Two Questions on Returns

Clarifying the return series that I use for my forecasts of future stock market returns, and is it likely for an investor to earn a 3% real return over a long horizon?

The Permanent Portfolio

I give a significant analysis of Harry Browne’s idea.? Yes, it works.

Four Simple Investment Strategies That Work

  1. Indexing
  2. Buy-and-hold
  3. Permanent Portfolio
  4. Bond Ladders

Operating vs Financial Cash Flows

Do ETFs affect the valuations of individual stocks, or the market as a whole?

The Rules, Part LXIII

(This rule applies to salesmen) ?We pay disclosed compensation. ?We pay undisclosed compensation. ?We don?t pay both?disclosed compensation?and undisclosed compensation.?

Steeling Themselves For Pension Benefit Cuts

On the?Kline-Miller Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014, and its impact on pension benefits in multiemployer plans that are VERY underfunded.

Because of underfunding, there will be more cuts. ?Depend on that happening for the worst funds, and at least run through the risk analysis of what you would do if your pension benefit were cut by 20% for a municipal plan, or to the PBGC limit for a corporate plan. ?Why? ?Because it could happen.

On the Pursuit of Economic Growth

On why cultural values play a large role in economic growth, but governments generally don’t.? (Hint: Stimulus is a dumb idea.)

The Financial Report of the United States Government 2016

This is an underrated report from the US Government, but even it is forced to downplay how the situation is for Social Security and Medicare.? Things aren’t getting better, and time is running short.? The next time I write about this is when the 2018 report comes out.? Until then remember my more recent piece?Notes from an Unwelcome Future, Part 1.

Perceived Versus Real Risk Tolerance

Perceived Versus Real Risk Tolerance

Picture Credit: Denise Krebs || What RFK said is not applicable to investing. ?Safety First! ?Don’t lose money!

=======

Investment entities, both people and institutions, often say one thing and mean another with respect to risk. ?They can keep a straight face with respect to minor market gyrations. ?But major market changes leading to the possible or actual questioning of whether they will have enough money to meet stated goals is what really matters to them.

There are six factors that go into any true risk analysis (I will handle them in order):

  1. Net Wealth Relative to Liabilities
  2. Time
  3. Liquidity
  4. Flexibility
  5. Investment-specific Factors
  6. Character of the Entity’s Decision-makers and their Incentives

Net Wealth Relative to Liabilities

The larger the surplus of assets over liabilities, the more relaxed and long-term focused an entity can be. ?For the individual, that attempts to measure the amount needed to meet future obligations where future investment earnings are calculated at a conservative level — my initial rule of thumb is no more than 1% above the 10-year Treasury yield.

That said, for entities with well defined liabilities, like a defined benefit pension plan, a bank, or an insurance company, using 1% above the yield curve should be a maximum for investment earnings, even for existing fixed income assets. ?Risk premiums will get taken into net wealth as they are earned. ?They should not be planned as if they are guaranteed to occur.

Time

The longer it is before payments need to be made, the more aggressive the investment posture can be. ?Now, that can swing two ways — with a larger surplus, or more time before payments need to be made, there is more freedom to tactically overweight or underweight?risky assets versus your normal investment posture.

That means that someone like Buffett is almost unconstrained, aside from paying off insurance claims and indebtedness. ?Not so for most investment entities, which often learn that their estimates of when they need the money are overestimates, and in a crisis, may need liquidity sooner than they ever thought.

Liquidity

High quality assets that can easily be turned into spendable cash helps make net wealth more secure. ?Unexpected cash outflows happen, and how do you meet those needs, particularly in a crisis? ?If you’ve got more than enough cash-like assets, the rest of the portfolio can be more aggressive. ?Remember, Buffett view cash as an option, because of what he can buy with it during a crisis. ?The question is whether the low returns from holding cash will get more than compensated for by capital gains and income on the rest of the portfolio across a full market cycle. ?Do the opportunistic purchases get made when the crisis comes? ?Do they pay off?

Also, if net new assets are coming in, aggressiveness can increase somewhat, but it matters whether the assets have promises attached to them, or are additional surplus. ?The former money must be invested coservatively, while surplus can be invested aggressively.

Flexibility

Some liabilities, or spending needs, can be deferred, at some level of cost or discomfort. ?As an example, if retirement assets are not sufficient, then maybe discretionary expenses can be reduced. ?Dreams often have to give way to reality.

Even in corporate situations, some payments can be stretched out with some increase in the cost of financing. ?One has to be careful here, because the time you are forced to conserve liquidity is often the same time that everyone else must do it as well, which means the cost of doing so could be high. ?That said, projects can be put on hold, realizing that growth will suffer; this can be a “choose your poison” type of situation, because it might cause the stock price to fall, with unpredictable second order effects.

Investment-specific Factors

Making good long term investments will enable a higher return over time, but concentration of ideas can in the short-run lead to underperformance. ?So long as you don’t need cash soon, or you have a large surplus of net assets, such a posture can be maintained over the long haul.

The same thing applies to the need for income from investments. ?investments can shoot less for income and more for capital gains if the need for spendable cash is low. ?Or, less liquid investments can be purchased if they offer a significant return for giving up the liquidity.

Character of the Entity’s Decision-makers and their Incentives

The last issue, which many take first, but I think is last, is how skilled the investors are in dealing with panic/greed situations. ?What is your subjective “risk tolerance?” ?The reason I put this last, is that if you have done your job right, and properly sized the first five factors above, there will be enough surplus and liquidity that does not easily run away in a crisis. ?When portfolios are constructed so that they are prepared for crises and manias, the subjective reactions are minimized because the call on cash during a crisis never gets great enough to force them to move.

A: “Are we adequate?”

B: “More than adequate. ?We might even be able to take advantage of the crisis…”

The only “trouble” comes when almost everyone is prepared. ?Then no significant crises come. ?That theoretical problem is very high quality, but I don’t think the nature of mankind ever changes that much.

Closing

Pay attention to the risk factors of investing relative to your spending needs (or, liabilities). ?Then you will be prepared for the inevitable storms that will come.

The Doubling Rule

The Doubling Rule

Picture Credit: Vincent Brown || Einstein never said this, either…

=======================

If you are famous and dead, many people will attribute clever sayings to you that you never said. ?As Yogi Berra said:

I really didn?t say everything I said.

Except that Yogi did say that.? Now, if Einstein didn’t do enough for us, he supposedly made many statements praising compound interest, but the articles I have seen haven’t been able to trace it back to an original source. ?Personally, I think compound interest is overrated, because business processes can’t forever compound wealth at a steady rate.

But some also have tried to credit Einstein with the Rule of 72. ?You know, the rule that says the time it takes to double your money in years is equal to 72 divded by the annual compound interest rate expressed as as an integer. ?E.g., at 8% your money doubles in 9 years. ?At 9% you money doubles in 8 years.

Pretty nice, and easy to remember. ?It is an approximation though. ?If Einstein ever did look at the rule of 72, he would have noticed that the approximation is pretty good between 3% and 13%. ?Outside that it gets further away.

One advantage of the rule of 72 is that it is simple. ?The second one is that 72 = 3 x 3 x 2 x 2 x 2. ?That makes it divide more intuitively by many integral interest rates, e.g., 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12 — allowing for some intuitive interpolation to aid it.

There is a more complex version of the doubling rule though:

The doubling constant starts (in the limit) at 100 times the natural logarithm of 2 [69.3147], and increases almost linearly from there. ?If you estimate a “best linear fit” line on the observations where the interest rate is between 0 and 30, the R-squared will be over 99.98%. ?The equation would be:

K = 69.3856 + 0.3313 * interest rate ?[Linear Fit K]

To make it a little more memorable rule, it can be turned into:

K = 70 + (interest rate – 2)/3 ?[Rule K]

Thus at 2% the doubling constant would be 70 — money doubles in 35 years. ?At 5%, 71, money doubles in 14.2 years. ?8% is the rule of 72 — nine years to double. ?At 11%, 73, 6.6 years to double. ?At 14%, 74, 5.3 years to double. 17%, 75, 4.4 years to double. 20%, 76, 3.8 years to double. ?I did those in my head.

As you can see from the graph above, the actual doubling constant and its two approximations lie on top of each other. ?Not that I hope we see ultrahigh interest rates, but Rule K does quite well over a long span of rates. ?Here’s how small the deviations are:

Now, almost no one will use “Rule K” because the two advantages of the Rule of 72 are huge, and if interest rates get really high, someone could create an easy smartphone app to calculate the doubling period. (and constant if they wanted)

This is interesting for me, because I ran across what I call the “Rule of K” earlier in my career, and I was able to reproduce it on my own after reading the WSJ article that I cited above. ?Who knows, maybe Einstein took the doubling rule and did a first order Taylor expansion around 2% — that would have produced something very close to the “Rule of K” back when regressions were hard to do.

That’s all, and if you made it this far, thanks for bearing with me.

One Dozen Thoughts on Dealing with Risk in Investing for Retirement

One Dozen Thoughts on Dealing with Risk in Investing for Retirement

Photo Credit: Ian Sane || Many ways to supplement retirement income...
Photo Credit: Ian Sane || One of many ways to supplement retirement income…

Investing is difficult. That said, it can be harder still. Let people with little to no training to try to do it for themselves. Sadly, many people get caught in the fear/greed cycle, and show up at the wrong time to buy and/or sell. They get there late, and then their emotions trick them into action. A rational investor would say, ?Okay, I missed that move. Where are opportunities now, if there are any at all??

Investing can be made even more difficult. ?Investing reaches its most challenging level when one relies on his investing to meet an anticipated and repeated need for cash outflows.

Institutional investors will say that portfolio decisions are almost always easier when there is more cash flowing in than flowing out. ?It means that there is one dominant mode of thought: where to invest?new money? ?Some attention will be given to managing existing assets ? pruning away assets with less potential, but the need won?t be as pressing.

What?s tough is trying to meet a?cash withdrawal?rate that is materially higher than what can safely be achieved over time, and earning enough?consistently to do so. ?Doing so as an amateur managing a retirement portfolio is a particularly hard version of this problem. ?Let me point out some of the areas where it will be hard:

1) The retiree doesn?t know how long he, his spouse, and anyone else relying on him will live. ?Averages can be calculated, but particularly with two people, the odds are that at least one will outlive an average life expectancy. ?Can they be conservative enough in their withdrawals that they won?t outlive their assets?

It?s tempting to overspend, and the temptation will get greater when bad events happen that break the budget, whether those are healthcare or other needs. ?It is incredibly difficult to?avoid paying for an immediate pressing need, when the soft cost?is harming your future. ?There is every incentive to say, ?We?ll figure it out later.? ?The odds on that being true will be low.

2) One conservative estimate of what the safe withdrawal rate is on a perpetuity is the yield on the 10-year Treasury Note plus around 1%. ?That additional 1% can be higher after the market has gone through a bear market, and valuations are cheap, and as low as zero near the end of a bull market.

That said, most?people people with discipline want a simple spending rule, and so those that are moderately conservative choose that they can spend 4%/year of their assets. ?At present, if interest rates don?t go lower still, that will likely (60-80% likelihood) work. ?But if income needs are greater than that, the odds of obtaining those yields over the long haul go down dramatically.

3) How does a retiree deal with bear markets, particularly ones that occur early in retirement? ?Can?he and?will he reduce his expenses to reflect the losses? ?On the other side, during bull markets, will he build up a buffer, and not get incautious during seemingly good times?

This is an easy prediction to make, but after the next bear market, look for a scad of ?Our retirement is ruined articles.? ?Look for there to be hearings in Congress that don?t amount to much ? and if they?do amount to much, watch them make things worse by?creating R Bonds, or some similarly bad idea.

Academic risk models typically used by financial planners typically don?t do path-dependent analyses.? The odds of a ruinous situation is far higher than most models estimate because of the need for withdrawals and the autocorrelated nature of returns ? good returns begets good, and bad returns beget bad in the intermediate term.? The odds of at least one large bad streak of returns on risky assets during retirement is high, and few retirees will build up a buffer of slack assets to prepare for that.

4)?Retirees should avoid investing in too many income vehicles; the easiest temptation to give into is to stretch for yield ? it?is the oldest scam in the books. ?This applies to dividend paying common stocks, and stock-like investments like REITs, MLPs, BDCs, etc. ?They have no guaranteed return of principal. ?On the plus side, they may give capital gains if bought at the right time, when they are out of favor, and reducing exposure when everyone is buying them.? Negatively, all junior debt tends to return worse on average than senior debts.? It is the same for equity-like investments used for income investing.

Another easy prediction to make is that junk bonds and non-bond income vehicles will be a large contributor to the shortfall in asset return in the next bear market, because many people are buying them as if they are magic. ?The naive buyers think: all they do is provide a higher income, and there is no increased risk of capital loss.

5) Leaving retirement behind for a moment, consider the asset accumulation process.? Compounding is trickier than it may seem. ?Assets must be selected that will grow their value including dividend payments over a reasonable time horizon, corresponding to a market cycle or so (4-8 years). ?Growth in value should be in excess of that from expanding stock market multiples or falling interest rates, because you want to compound in the future, and low interest rates and high stock market multiples imply that future compounding opportunities are lower.

Thus, in one sense, there is no benefit much from a general rise in values from the stock or bond markets. ?The value of a portfolio may have risen, but at the cost of lower future opportunities. ?This is more ironclad in the bond market, where the cash flow streams are fixed. ?With stocks and other risky investments, there may be some ways to do better.

Retirees should be aware that the actions taken by one member of a large cohort of retirees will be taken by many of them.? This makes risk control more difficult, because many of the assets and services that one would like to buy get bid up because they are scarce.? Often it may be that those that act earliest will do best, and those arriving last will do worst, but that is common to investing in many circumstances.? As Buffett has said, ?What a?wise man?does in the beginning a?fool?does in the?end.?

6) Retirement investors should avoid taking too much?or too little risk. It?s psychologically difficult to buy risk assets when things seem horrible, or sell when everyone else is carefree. ?If a person can do that successfully, he is rare.

What is achievable by many is to maintain a constant risk posture. ?Don?t panic; don?t get greedy ? stick to a moderate asset allocation through the cycles of the markets.

7) With asset allocation, retirees should overweight out-of-favor asset classes that offer above average cashflow yields. ?Estimates on these can be found at GMO or?Research Affiliates. ?They should rebalance into new asset classes when they become cheap.

Another way retirees can succeed would be investing in growth at a reasonable price ? stocks that offer capital growth opportunities at an inexpensive price and a margin of safety. ?These companies or assets need to have large opportunities in front of them that they can reinvest their free cash flow into. ?This is harder to do than it looks. ?More companies look promising and do not perform well than those that do perform well.

Yet another way to enhance returns is value investing: find undervalued companies with a margin of safety that have potential to recover when conditions normalize, or find companies that can convert their resources to a better use that have the willingness to do that. ?After the companies do well, reinvest in new possibilities that have better appreciation potential.

 

8 ) Many say that the first rule of markets is to avoid losses. ?Here are some methods to remember:

  • Always seek a margin of safety. ?Look for valuable assets well in excess of debts, governed by the rule of law, and purchased at a bargain price.
  • For assets that have fallen in price, don?t try to time the bottom ? buy the asset when it rises above its 200-day moving average. This can limit risk, potentially buying when the worst is truly past.
  • Conservative investors avoid the areas where the hot money is buying and own assets being acquired by patient investors.

9) As assets shrink, what should be liquidated? ?Asset allocation is more difficult than it is described in the textbooks, or in the syllabuses for the CFA Institute or for CFPs.? It is a blend of two things ? when does the investor need the money, and what asset classes offer decent risk adjusted returns looking forward?? The best strategy is forward-looking, and liquidates what has the lowest risk-adjusted future return. ?What is easy is selling assets off from everything proportionally, taking account of tax issues where needed.

Here?s another strategy that?s gotten a little attention lately: stocks are longer assets than bonds, so use bonds to pay for your spending in the early years of your retirement, and initially don?t sell the stocks.? Once the bonds run out, then start selling stocks if the dividend income isn?t enough to live on.

This idea is weak.? If a person followed this in 1997 with a 10-year horizon, their stocks would be worth less in 2008-9, even if they rocket back out to 2014.

Remember again:

You don?t benefit much from a general rise in values from the stock or bond markets. ?The value of your portfolio may have risen, but at the cost of lower future opportunities.

That goes double in the distribution phase. The objective is to convert assets into a stream of income. ?If interest rates are low, as they are now, safe income will be low. ?The same applies to stocks (and things like them) trading at high multiples regardless of what dividends they pay.

Don?t look at current income. ?Look instead at the underlying economics of the business, and how it grows value. ?It is far better to have a growing income stream than a high income stream with low growth potential.

Deciding what to sell is an exercise in asset-liability management.? Keep the assets that offer the best return over the period that they are there to fund future expenses.

10) Will Social Security take a hit out around 2026? ?One interpretation of the law says that once the trust fund gets down to one year?s worth of?payments, future payments may get reduced to the level?sustainable by expected future contributions, which is 73% of expected levels. ?Expect a political firestorm if this becomes a live issue, say for the 2024 Presidential election. ?There will be a bloc of voters to oppose leaving benefits unchanged by increasing Social Security taxes.

Even if benefits last at projected levels longer than 2026, the risk remains that there will be some compromise in the future that might reduce benefits because taxes will not be raised.? This is not as secure as a government bond.

11) Be wary of inflation, but don?t overdo it. ?The retirement of so many people may be deflationary ? after all, look at Japan and Europe so far. ?Economies also work better when there is net growth in the number of workers. ?It will be tempting for policymakers to shrink what liabilities they can shrink through inflation, but there will also be a bloc of voters to oppose that.

Also consider other risks, and how assets may fare. ?Retirees should analyze what exposure they have to:

  • Deflation and a credit crisis
  • Expropriation
  • Regulatory change
  • Trade wars
  • Changes in taxes
  • Asset illiquidity
  • Reductions in reimbursement from government programs like Medicare, Medicaid, etc.
  • And more?

12) Retirees need a defender of two against slick guys who will try to cheat them when they are older. ?Those who have assets are a prime target for scams. ?Most of these come dressed in suits: brokers and other investment salesmen with plausible ways to make assets stretch further. ?But there are other scams as well ? retirees should run everything significant past a smart younger person who is skeptical, and knows how to say no when it is necessary.

Conclusion

Some will think this is unduly dour, but this?is realistic. ?There are not enough resources to give all of the Baby Boomers a lush retirement, without unduly harming younger age cohorts, and this is true over most of the developed world, not just the US.

Even with skilled advisers helping, retirees need to be ready for the hard choices that will come up. They should think through them earlier rather than later, and take some actions that will lower future risks.

The basic idea of retirement investing is how to convert present excess income into a robust income stream in retirement. ?Managing a pile of assets for income to live off of is a challenge, and one that most people?are not geared up for, because poor planning and emotional decisions lead to subpar results.

Retirees should?aim for the best future investment opportunities with a margin of safety, and let the retirement income take care of itself. ?After all, they can?t rely on the markets or the policymakers to make income opportunities easy.

Book Review: Win by not Losing

Book Review: Win by not Losing

Just follow my methods and you will make money. Yes, it is another one of *those* books.? Most of them are not worth your money.? This one might be worth it, but let me give you my misgivings.

The book warms up slowly, because it spends most of its early time destroying other ideas, without introducing their main ideas.? For example, it spends time destroying:

  • Gains in the market come slowly and steadily.? Correct, that’s wrong.? As my readers should know, market returns are lumpy. [Note to readers at Amazon, there are links at my blog that explain these concepts in greater detail.]
  • Modern Portfolio Theory.? Again, no argument here, it is not a good explanation as to how the market works.
  • Volatility isn’t risk; risk is the potential to lose.? Again right.
  • Diversification among risky assets does not provide much risk reduction.? Again right.
  • Most mutual funds miss out on the ability to limit risk, because they forbid market timing.? Here I differ.? Aside from funds that aim to time the markets, the asset allocation decision is not in the hands of the managers, but the shareholders, who must them selves decide how much stocks to hold.

This leads to their main hypothesis, that people have been duped into buy & hold investing, when they could make a lot more money if they only invested when conditions are favorable.

There are two problems with this: 1) how can you tell when times are favorable or not?? I use the credit cycle, and estimates of what various asset classes are likely to return if they were private businesses, but not everyone can follow that.? They give their simplified version, which is a moving average crossover method.? Buy when stocks are above the moving average.? Sell when they are below.? Simple, huh?

Yes, simple, and that brings up problem 2.? If a lot of people began managing money in a way like this, the market would become more volatile.? At moving average crossovers, people would rush to buy and sell as groups.? Some would shorten their moving average formula to get a jump on others.? Any risk control method, if used by many will cease to work well.

Other Difficulties

  • Though it is not a major aspect of their book, and it comes toward the end, part of the goal of the book is to interest people in purchasing their newsletter and/or money management services.
  • At times, buy and hold investing is the optimal way to go for an era.? Also, not holding assets for a long time limits the ability to limit taxes, and compound really large gains.? My mother and my father-in-law, amateur investors both, limited their taxes on their investing largely through buying and holding quality stocks over decades.? (The authors do advise that their strategy is best done in a tax-deferred account.)
  • At one point the book insists that the Capital Asset Pricing Model [CAPM] implies that the equity risk premium is constant.? Sorry, but that’s not true.? Many financial planners act as if it is true.? What is true is that it is challenging to estimate the varying equity risk premium.? Value investors have their own way of doing it, but it boils down to: “I’m not seeing many attractive opportunities to deploy capital.”
  • On page 116, they make too much out of how households have too much money in cash as a fraction of their assets near market bottoms.? The amount of cash may vary some — in general at market bottoms, institutions hold relatively more stock, but the main reason for the increased percentage invested in cash is simply the fall in prices for risky assets.? Aside from IPOs, mergers for cash, acquisitions for cash, money doesn’t enter & exit the market.? Market prices reflect the willing of marginal buyers and sellers to trade cash for stock, and vice-versa.? In aggregate, nothing changes except the price.
  • They criticize the Facebook IPO as one where sellers knew things would get worse, and so they sold, delivering losses to buyers.? But Facebook stock is considerably higher now than the IPO price.? Those that took the losses from the IPO didn’t wait long enough.
  • Page 150 — it took a longer time after 1980 before 401(k)s began replacing Defined Benefit pensions plans in any major way.? Congress passed several pieces of legislation in the late 80s which made sponsoring a DB plan less attractive; that’s when the changes started in earnest.
  • Page 171 — there were many in the insurance industry that remembered being burned on Collateralized Debt Obligations [CDOs] 1998-2002.? It was a common insight that CDOs were weak assets, and underpriced among insurers.? A new class of buyers got skinned in 2008, particularly banks and hedge funds.
  • Page 180 — there were many firms that anticipated the fall in subprime lending.? I worked for one of them.? I wrote an article about it for RealMoney.com in late 2006.? It took a lot of courage to take action on the “Big Short,” and not many did.
  • The book dabbles on many topics, showing a superficial understanding of many ideas/events in order to show they one should not buy & hold.? The book plods for 80%+ of its pages developing what fails, and spends less than 20% of its time giving what one ought to do.? Their strategy takes up ~40 pages of a ~240 page book.

All that said, is the strategy a reasonable one?? Probably yes, but not if a lot of people adopt it.? Advanced amateur investors could implement the ideas of the book easily, those with less experience would need help to do it, and the authors offer that help, much of it free, and more for a fee.

Quibbles

Already expressed.? I’ll stick with value investing; I’d rather have a lumpy 15% than a smooth 12%.? This book could have been better if it focused on its positive strategy, fleshed it out more, so that average amateurs would have had a clearer direction on what to do.

Who would benefit from this book: If you don’t have an investing strategy and you want one, this book may benefit you.? I have read far worse strategies in many books.? If you want to, you can buy it here: Win By Not Losing: A Disciplined Approach to Building and Protecting Your Wealth in the Stock Market by Managing Your Risk.

Full disclosure: The publisher sent me the book after asking me if I wanted it.

If you enter Amazon through my site, and you buy anything, I get a small commission.? This is my main source of blog revenue.? I prefer this to a ?tip jar? because I want you to get something you want, rather than merely giving me a tip.? Book reviews take time, particularly with the reading, which most book reviewers don?t do in full, and I typically do. (When I don?t, I mention that I scanned the book.? Also, I never use the data that the PR flacks send out.)

Most people buying at Amazon do not enter via a referring website.? Thus Amazon builds an extra 1-3% into the prices to all buyers to compensate for the commissions given to the minority that come through referring sites.? Whether you buy at Amazon directly or enter via my site, your prices don?t change.

Sorted Weekly Tweets

Sorted Weekly Tweets

Interest Rates

  • How Sensitive we are to Interest Rates: A Scary Picture? http://t.co/gkKi3sSLbs Argues moderate rise in rates inverts banks & governments $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Fixing Economy As Easy As 1-2-3 http://t.co/sbW97kL2n7 Axel Merk says 2 make policy predictable, let interest rates rise & allow failure $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Low Rates Bring Bond Bonanza http://t.co/f8gQ0rjcTB Corporations act to lock in cheap long-term financing 2pay dividends & buy back stock $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Fed QE Taper Seen Delayed to March as Shutdown Bites http://t.co/v2Bo85GP9m Would not b so sure here; this is only a survey of economists $$ Oct 20, 2013
  • The ‘Rate Gap’ Is Rising http://t.co/w9dSYfQCl5 Gap between deposit rates & borrowing rates is higher than it’s been in 32 of last 40 yrs $$ Oct 20, 2013
  • Alan Greenspan: Where the Economy Went Wrong http://t.co/a7t3RGvbSZ Fed does not get they created the housing bubble; learn the bond math $$ Oct 20, 2013
  • Javelin Files 2 Trade Interest-Rate Swaps, Spurring SEF Shift http://t.co/B6KOHsmmpy Smart. Start w/simple liquid derivatives @ exchanges $$ Oct 20, 2013

?PPACA/ Obamacare

 

  • Court could block Obamacare subsidies in 34 states http://t.co/ej65x9fALf Legal challenge could knock out the federal exchanges $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Botched Launch of Health Site Blamed on Poor Coordination http://t.co/iwH5vsbftX The software developers point the finger at one another $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Federal Centers 4 Medicare and Medicaid Services acted as its own systems integrator for the site: unusual arrangement 4a complex project.$$ Oct 25, 2013
  • White House Sets Late-November Target for Fixes to Health Site http://t.co/WebNZLBebq UnitedHealth Group Unit Tapped to Oversee Repairs $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Obama Says Health Care Law More Important Than Website http://t.co/SopPqG99ky If a law can’t b administered properly what good is it? $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Why Obamacare Is Like Three Mile Island http://t.co/STOU4Ng3KL Problems in overall plan design were foreseeable; not merely and accident $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Noonan: ObamaCare Takes On Water http://t.co/cpKjIyJZWg Software development is difficult when no single party responsible for everything $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Contractors See Weeks of Work on Health Site http://t.co/WUoqiaiMtZ Have friends that once worked 4 CGI; to them this is no surprise $$ Oct 22, 2013

Rest of the World

 

  • Top China Banks Triple Debt Write-Offs as Defaults Loom http://t.co/DYNZ8shAV5 They trying to get ahead of the problem, but it’s too big $$ Oct 26, 2013
  • Local Governments Have Borrowed a Pile of Money in Recent Years, Leaving Even Beijing Wondering How Much $$ http://t.co/YZKTKDUjs0 Oct 25, 2013
  • Jail Time No Bar to Tea-Server Turned Top Woman Bureaucrat http://t.co/WKWO4MmPwu While detained, she used the free time 2 read 150 books $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Yakuza Bosses Whacked by Regulators Freezing AmEx Cards http://t.co/qCKQI7Mo4s Money is often the easiest thing to track; leaves a trail $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • I realize that @Borderscrossed , & I phrased that tweet wrong — the Chinese typically play w/lower risk ventures. This is unusual 4them $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • China Inc. Battles Big Oil for Century?s Biggest Find http://t.co/CCm4QxgpC8 They have capital, but not expertise, & r rolling the dice $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Obama Joins Putin War as Syria Jihadists Stalk Olympics http://t.co/zxwpTvWiv1 The Winter Olympic games in Sochi could be a real blast $$ 😉 Oct 25, 2013
  • Saudi Women Plan to Hit Roads in New Push for Right to Drive http://t.co/Iu78Zmsxp0 Fear: if they r allowed 2 drive, will drive out of SA $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • 40 Years After Embargo, OPEC Is Over a Barrel http://t.co/6CcliMnOkv Few things r truly certain. Dead Worries: OPEC, Russia, Japan, China $$ Oct 20, 2013
  • The Chinese Characters Dictation Competition Is a Test Few Could Pass http://t.co/5MnpMaMozF Chinese spelling bee w/ideographs; tough $$ Oct 20, 2013

US Politics & Economics

 

  • Financial Report of the US Government http://t.co/9rknzA89Te Here’s my piece. The unfunded liabilities of the Fed Govt r ~$78T $$ 5x GDP Oct 26, 2013
  • If you call a crash & you get the reason right, that *is* impressive; timing is always tough. Hint: look for a arb that has gone negative $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • ?Outrageous? tax loopholes in Democrat?s sights http://t.co/ibntGjND15 Every loophole has coalition to block its elimination; won’t work $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Budget Discord Simmers Among Democrats http://t.co/gdNJqQTXEI Some Liberal Groups, Lawmakers Worry About Cuts 2Entitlements $$ biggest issue Oct 25, 2013
  • Treasuries Lose Cachet on Lowest Foreign Demand Since ?01 http://t.co/0PhlcmXXqv Bondholders have short memories; wouldn’t worry $$ $TLT Oct 25, 2013
  • Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Chances: The Coming Train Wreck http://t.co/JN61FbNNrY Will test whether having a long political resume is good $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Never believe anything in Washington, DC until it is explicitly denied. The US Government has lied to us in the past $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • The Lessons of Classified Information: From Mossadegh to Snowden http://t.co/Ab7ytJrdRA CIA plot in Iran widely suspected, now confirmed $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Middle Class Americans Face a Retirement Shutdown; 37% Say ?I?ll Never Retire, But Work Until I?m 2 Sick or Die,? $$ http://t.co/oGDNMful7I Oct 25, 2013
  • Reality is setting in if 37% think they won’t b able to retire. http://t.co/LA9KI4Tvrx Reality will arrive when number is 80% $$ $TLT $SPY Oct 25, 2013
  • Selling the Good Life on the Great Plains http://t.co/fKl4Jh8syI Rural areas pitch the slower pace to city dwellers in order to survive $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Stanley Druckenmiller: How Washington Really Redistributes Income http://t.co/Cbkv9FyRu9 Baby Boomers suck the blood of those younger $$ Oct 20, 2013
  • Banks Pushed by Regulators Send ?Nastygrams? to Car Dealers http://t.co/W9RC6BJP7x Discrimination in lending is taking heat from the CFPB $$ Oct 20, 2013
  • Two articles on States Clamping Down on Workers as Contractors http://t.co/QQXoTSRZOU & http://t.co/a1OUq8MvNE Develop significant skills $$ Oct 20, 2013

Companies & Industries

 

  • Abby Johnson, the rarely seen face of Fidelity http://t.co/6dJHDIm7ES Wonder if the Washington Post pulled the story under pressure $$ $WPO Oct 25, 2013
  • Might Google Have a Sly Motive Behind Motorola? http://t.co/FwtqFYXYoV Argues that $GOOG bot Motorola 2 poison profits 4 $AAPL & $SSNLF $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Cruise Prices Sinking: Some Now Cheaper Than Motel 6 http://t.co/dhjvxc8ytS They will leave the light on 4u; the buffet will b open 2 $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Buffett says he passed on buying Washington Post http://t.co/dvZciwJDJh Definitely one to avoid, or throw in the “too hard” bin $$ $WPO Oct 25, 2013
  • Wal-Mart Now Draws More Solar Power Than 38 US States http://t.co/ysFvCFHWgr Drop the solar subsidies, and see if $WMT would still do it $$ Oct 25, 2013

The Financial Sector

 

  • Margin Debt Hits New High http://t.co/r0bXQwBs6X Where will additional buying power come to push up stock prices? Only game left is QE? $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • House flipping makes a comeback http://t.co/VAIcl86lQk Speculation returning to housing market; remember, only cash flows matter 4 prices $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • PCAOB Warns on Internal-Control Problems http://t.co/ZKZQwBnICe 15% of Auditors didn’t get enough data on internal control effectiveness $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Weitz to Yacktman Hold Cash as Managers Find Few Bargains http://t.co/RXFoMbBJfX Not many places 2 compound value w/margin of safety $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • US extends backing for higher-priced mortgages http://t.co/Yk5zHr9CcW Continuing to subsidize overinvestment in residential real estate $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Buffett Says Gains in Housing Fall Short of Equilibrium http://t.co/aMp5aawapZ Rare wrong Buffett; US overinvests in residential RE $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Dollar Drops to 8-Month Low as Risk Appetite Swells on Fed Bets http://t.co/KtQDmkS4Yf Fed surprising w/unexpected looseness so $$ falls Oct 20, 2013

Other

 

  • A CIO?s First Task: Understanding the Culture http://t.co/4cg1GdKBZo Understanding the culture is a key to most leadership roles $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Never Shop in October and Other Secrets From a Retail Guru http://t.co/KoWB9NYsmt Tips on how to avoid how retailers try 2 influence u $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • The Boss Is Watching: Tracking Technology Shakes Up Workplace http://t.co/WDAzYg1MJK Little brother watches 4 employees who shirk $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Ex-Madoff Employee Tells Jury of ?Cut And Paste? Trades http://t.co/SJCd2TU13b Employees claim they were duped by Madoff. Q: were they? $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • Book Review: ‘Johnny Carson’ by Henry Bushkin http://t.co/OTB8HMQK6e Bombastic Bushkin gets 2 dance on the grave in this tell-all book $$ Oct 20, 2013
  • So You Want to Go to Winemaking School? http://t.co/JdpI5QCE6t Visit the UC-Davis viticultural & oenology program. $$ #wine Oct 20, 2013
  • It isn’t only one of the oldest winemaking programs in the country, but arguably the most prestigious $$ #wine Oct 20, 2013
  • The First Car You Can Build Yourself… in an Hour http://t.co/bZF43gH3ti Pretty cool for a little more than $8000 $$ Ships in a box Oct 20, 2013
  • The Gap Between Schooling and Education http://t.co/zJGqxgkoTT @AnnieLowrey interviews author of forthcoming book: http://t.co/bgftBBsT7d $$ Oct 19, 2013
  • Schools amplify parenting cultures. Motivated parents create good schools; too many top-down demands on schools inhibits true learning $$ Oct 19, 2013

Wrong

  • Wrong: Another billionaire is predicting doom. Ignore him. http://t.co/qh8BBp0izo Rather ignore this writer; doesn’t understand the stats $$ Oct 26, 2013
  • Wrong: Does the United States have $128 trillion in unfunded liabilities? http://t.co/D5Z3dkPICT Writer does not understand the figures $$ Oct 26, 2013
  • Wrong: Stanley Druckenmiller crisis predictions: Anyone can call a bubble years in advance. http://t.co/0W9FhMyHKT But few succeed $$ Oct 25, 2013

Retweets, Replies & Comments

  • I wrote about that more than once @DividendMaster . E.g. http://t.co/SrBiSHsHVZ $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • “They are reinvesting their free cash flow, which is different than profits.?” ? David_Merkel http://t.co/bt0CCZW9zH $$ $AMZN Oct 25, 2013
  • Same Old Amazon: All Sales, No Profit http://t.co/FL6ZbcGh8j $AMZN borrows2fund investment & uses free cashflow, much like private equity $$ Oct 25, 2013
  • RT @JimPethokoukis: 11.2%: What the unemployment rate would be if labor force participation was the same as when the recession started Oct 23, 2013
  • Experian Sold Consumer Data to ID Theft Service http://t.co/tjJbAXXxuN @japhychron yes, significant reason to worry & watch 4 ID theft $$ Oct 22, 2013
Theme: Overlay by Kaira