The Aleph Blog » 2012 » June

Archive for June, 2012

Sorted Weekly Tweets

Saturday, June 30th, 2012



  • Germany Signals Shift on Europe Aid “a common fiscal policy would be irreversible and well coordinated.” $$ Jun 29, 2012
  • Bermuda on track to comply with EU insurer rules If not, cos reinsured could not take full reserve credit;wud lose biz Jun 26, 2012
  • How Germany’s euro fight has turned Orwellian “foreigners shouldn’t overestimate Germany’s financial capacity.” $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Hollande Reality Makes French Debt Less Attractive Bondholders care about getting repaid. Hollande = higher risk $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Germany to Confront United Euro Bloc at Summit Time to bring back the D-mark, or, centralize the E-zone into a nation Jun 25, 2012
  • All the bail-out systems under the sun cannot make the eurozone work The loans, at whatever rate, cannot b repaid $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • Merkel Parries Push for Euro Debt Plan as Growth Outline Agreed Merkel repeated “liabilities & controls go together” Jun 24, 2012
  • Bundesbank Swipes at Draghi as European Fault Lines Deepen Do you want your currency 2b a stable unit of account $$ Jun 24, 2012
  • Spanish Government in Denial: Banks Need 100B EUR to Recapitalize Eurozone is under stress & estimates capital low $$ Jun 24, 2012




  • TEXAS SHIFT MAY SHOW WAY OUT OF IMMIGRATION STALEMATE Favoring guest-worker programs may break national stalemate $$ Jun 29, 2012
  • A defense of the tax exemption for municipal bonds (part one) @munilass explains the reasonable nature of the exemption Jun 29, 2012
  • Congress Would Hate to Lose Its Tax-Code Toys @cabaum points out that our current policies aren’t working $$ Jun 29, 2012
  • All municipalities that raise employee benefits without respect for costs deserve bankruptcy: thus Stockon, CA $$ Jun 29, 2012
  • Pt 2 — individual does not survive, and the fragmentation of the decision makes the interpretation messy; Obama implements asmuch he can $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Going to toss out a wild idea on #scotus & PPACA/Obamacare; several concurring opinions get issued overturning aspects of the law, but… $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Yield spreads widening, Industrial commodity prices falling. I think those are the main factors. Jun 26, 2012
  • No such thing as animal spirits, businessmen r cautious w/debt $$ RT @EconTalker: Spending is the consequence of prosperity, not its cause. Jun 26, 2012
  • Biggest U.S. Banks Curb Loans as Regional Firms Fill Gap Lending reduction from bigs is > increase from regionals $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Flood Cleanup Continues in Duluth “surge of run-off from the hill made the flood so dramatic.” Duluth flooded? $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • Stockton, CA Nears Bankruptcy Will reduce employee benefit costs; muni bondholders likely be paid $$ 14x Vallejo Jun 25, 2012
  • States Face Pressure on Pension Shortfalls GASB finally gets spine & tells states their pension acctg is liberal $$ Jun 24, 2012




  • @RMGSelection They get clones of portfolios that I personally own Jun 29, 2012
  • @RMGSelection I manage separately managed accounts of stocks and bonds for upper middle class individuals and small institutions Jun 29, 2012
  • @RMGSelection You’re welcome, but I don’t do Facebook :( Jun 28, 2012
  • @BubblesandBusts 40% banks; top 10 75%, too much downside risk in a real washout, would rather consider $TEF, $REP, or maybe a CEF… $$ Jun 27, 2012
  • You’re sounding good, keep it up $$ RT @ReformedBroker: @AlephBlog bob auer from auer growth fund Jun 26, 2012
  • @ReformedBroker Who was the GARP mgr that you were interviewing late in the 1st hour, and early 2nd hour? Jun 26, 2012
  • @CLHinkle I don’t know enough about Gina Rainmondo; don’t live there, etc. What little I have seen of her I have mostly liked $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • “Hard to see how Telefonica $TEF goes bust. 5.4% is a lot of spread… $$” — David_Merkel Jun 26, 2012
  • EJ made its name w/quantitative models of corporate risk; govts aren’t the same $$ RT @fundmyfund: Egan Jones has jumped the shark Jun 26, 2012
  • RT @TheOneDave: Chemicals ought to come with a U.S. economic warning label. See this Chart of the Day: via @Bloombe … Jun 26, 2012
  • What a chart, but price was lower in April 2000 $$ RT @BarbarianCap: Arch Coal $ACI lifetime low, I think. Jun 26, 2012
  • RT @historysquared: sustained negative real yields in advanced economies (preceded double digit inflation in the 70s) Jun 26, 2012
  • Well done! $$ RT @AmyResnick: Well beyond bonds: Digging into reports from muni borrowers : Reynolds Center Jun 26, 2012
  • Switched back 2 old RT @asymmetricinfo: New Tweetdeck app has broken the ability to follow conversations. Curse you, Tweetdeck developers! Jun 26, 2012
  • ‘ @grossdm Skills that can be used by multiple employers r typically paid for by the employee; company-specific skills by the employer $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • @moneyscience I didn’t find this compelling; my practical experience in holding multiple auctions says differently $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • @manualofideas I agree, it is hard. But when I was a kid, my friends would say to me, “There r accidents, but Dave, that error took skill.” Jun 25, 2012
  • @manualofideas there is the risk of continuing to lose money, and no deal emerges… $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • @saraeisenFX Dissolving the Euro would be the smartest idea, but ideologues insisting on “closer & deeper union” will say otherwise $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • Diversification: A substitute for knowledge & a poor one $$ RT @EddyElfenbein: The most over-rated investing concept = diversification. Jun 25, 2012
  • Can also pull into XL RT @TheStalwart: Wow, you can download all the data on FRED in one big file. Jun 24, 2012
  • @manualofideas What I sent to the SEC: Only 2 pgs long, but offers a simple solution. Let me know what u think Jun 24, 2012
  • @manualofideas Two pages: Let me know what you think. I think this is the best proposal so far. Jun 24, 2012




  • New bank theft software hits three continents “sophisticated enough to defeat… two-factor authentication” b aware $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Greed is an attitude, and it is not good. It is present with people who are addicted to making more. More, more, more… Jun 26, 2012
  • 1 Year of Your Life and $100,000: Growing Cost of Medical ID Theft Important 2b aware of this new form of ID theft $$ Jun 26, 2012

Market Currents


  • Do Good Investment Managers Give Away Great Ideas? It’s Entirely Rational According to New Study @sumzero & Value IC $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Tropical Storm The same could be said of pricing/trading in the bond market, and few complain about that. $$ Jun 26, 2012
  • Chesapeake Slumps On Report Of Scheme To Suppress Land Prices Another cockroach. Y I saw 1 of those yesterday… $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • Kepos’ quiet touch wins favor among quant funds Remains 2b tested. As a quant, how do u avoid crowded trades? $$ Jun 25, 2012




  • In a Shift, Chinese Exporters Cling to Dollars As I have sometimes said, it may be that the Yuan is overvalued $$ Jun 29, 2012
  • Central Banks Commit to Ease as Threat of Lost Decades Rises “It’s going 2b very hard for them 2 stimulate demand” $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • Should Tenure for College Professors Be Abolished? Tenure rewards the past, 2 the possible neglect of the future $$ Jun 25, 2012
  • Borg Bashes Banks in Sweden Shielding Housing Bubble Can a housing bubble be deflated w/o significant fallout? $$ Jun 25, 2012

Book Review: The Little Book of Hedge Funds

Saturday, June 30th, 2012


I have worked for a hedge fund, and I have many friends that work for hedge funds.  I understand hedge funds well.

The “Little Book” people at Wiley should indeed have done this book, but with a different author.  Why?  When there are significant areas of controversy around a topic, and you write a book as if there is no controversy, it means you haven’t done your homework.

There are many like Simon Lack, who wrote “The Hedge Fund Mirage,” and Dichev and Yu, who wrote “Higher risk, lower returns: What hedge fund investors really earn.” (Note to readers at, if you read this at my blog,, you get links to aid your learning.

Quoting from my review of Simon Lack’s book:

But, some of the problems with hedge funds, as a opposed to open-end mutual funds, is that:

1) Many hedge funds go out of business, and as they do, their bad performance is not recorded, and sometimes lost.

2) Hedge funds with good performance give the databases their early performance.  Bad early performance does not get reported.

3) The activity of investors chasing trends is more pronounced in hedge funds than in mutual funds, with a loss of returns of 5% in hedge funds, versus 3% in mutual funds.  This is all due to greater volatility.

4) Double alpha is generally not achievable, because most managers good at longs are not good at shorts, and vice-versa.  Going long and short are different skill sets.

These are issues that the author of the “Little Book” does not address in any significant way.  He mentions Simon Lack’s book once in passing, but doesn’t do anything substantive with it.  He also does not deal with the difference between dollar-weighted and time-weighted returns.  Because hedge funds are often quite volatile, investors buy at the wrong time (after a strong performance), and sell at the wrong time (after a weak performance).  What that implies is that the average investor in a hedge fund typically does worse than a buy-and-hold investor.

Other Problems

  • Page 121 contains a math error in the first example on shorting.  Yo! This is only arithmetic.  Didn’t anyone proofread the work?
  • Page 136 attempts to describe deal arbitrage, and makes what should be an easy concept rather turgid.  It is so unclear, that I would have to assume the author does not understand what is a simple concept.
  • The book does not spend any significant time on how we live in a different world now than in the glory days of hedge fund outperformance.  Even some slight commentary on the limits to arbitrage would have been useful.

Some Strengths

  • Much of the advice that the author gives in selecting hedge fund managers is sound, especially the list of red flags.
  • The “due diligence questionnaire” was also interesting.
  • Most of the descriptive material in the book was accurate, but there are other books and blog posts that provide that information, minus the hype.
  • This book is not mathematical, sometimes to a fault, where a chart or graph could have proven useful.


To be truly educated about hedge funds, you would need a lot more than this book.  This book reads like you are being pitched on how great hedge funds are; it does not provide enough on the limitations of hedge funds, nor does it interact with the critiques of hedge funds.

Who would benefit from this book: Most investors would not benefit from this book.  Particularly those that advise institutional clients and high net worth individuals would not benefit. It is too optimistic about the performance of hedge funds.  If you want to, you can buy it here: The Little Book of Hedge Funds (Little Books. Big Profits).

Full disclosure: The publisher asked if I wanted the book.  I said “yes” and he sent it to me.

If you enter Amazon through my site, and you buy anything, I get a small commission.  This is my main source of blog revenue.  I prefer this to a “tip jar” because I want you to get something you want, rather than merely giving me a tip.  Book reviews take time, particularly with the reading, which most book reviewers don’t do in full, and I typically do. (When I don’t, I mention that I scanned the book.  Also, I never use the data that the PR flacks send out.)

Most people buying at Amazon do not enter via a referring website.  Thus Amazon builds an extra 1-3% into the prices to all buyers to compensate for the commissions given to the minority that come through referring sites.  Whether you buy at Amazon directly or enter via my site, your prices don’t change.

On Bond Ladders

Thursday, June 28th, 2012

I received the following from a reader:

My primary motivation for writing to you is this post by Jeff Miller:

In my mind, you are the foremost expert blogger when it comes to bonds so I wanted to get your take.  It’s been a long time since my bond class getting my MBA and I haven’t dealt with bond math in quite awhile.

I’m wondering about this whole individual bond ladder versus bond fund issue.  Maybe I am wrong so I wanted to ask you.  Duration is duration.  Whether one owns an individual bond ladder or a bond fund, if the duration is the same, the price sensitivity to an increase in interest rates is the same?  If a person owns an individual bond ladder and rates move up, those bonds will be marked to market and show a capital loss even if they pay off at par at maturity, and you’ve locked in your cashflow.  With a bond fund, you take a price hit to the fund, but those cashflows from the fund get reinvested in the fund at lower prices and higher yields?

I guess I am just wondering if someone is going to buy and hold and sit tight for say 5-7 years whether they construct a bond ladder or buy a bond fund if the duration is the same, they are going to end up pretty much in the same place 5 years later.

Anyways, I hope maybe you will do a post on the ins and outs of bond math vis a vis interest rate changes and the pros and cons of bond funds versus a bond ladder from the perspective of duration.  Thanks.

From 1995-2001, I spent a lot of time doing interest rate modeling.  With the growth in computer power and modeling techniques, we finally hit the barrier of the “Turing test” as far as interest rates went in 1995 with my modeling.  As a part of our regular weekly meeting with the investment department, I brought examples of full yield curve interest rate modeling for a 30-year horizon.  When I showed what the future yield curves looked like, the bond managers said to me, “This is the first time we have ever seen a random model produce interest rate scenarios that look reasonable.”

For a brief period, my model was the best that I knew of.  By 2002 the actuarial profession as a whole came up with a better model, which they still use today for asset/liability management calculations.  Once I used it, I accepted it as better than my model, and used it for other processes beyond regulatory compliance.

Regardless, I did tests using my model and the more advanced model to see what the best strategy was for individual investors in bonds.  The only consistent result was that the ladder strategy was the second best strategy.  Never best.  Never worst. Reliable.

And I spent some time thinking about it.  Structurally, ladders work well when you don’t know what is going to happen.  If you are really, really smart, and you can consistently predict changes in yield curve steepness and levels, yes, you can do far better.

Ladders make sense from a cash flow standpoint because they are a sustainable strategy.  Maturing proceeds are invested in the longest bonds that the ladder accepts.  That keeps the interest rate risk even, and with a positively sloped yield curve, offers a relatively high yield.

I agree with the concept of ladders.  But ladders are not incompatible with mutual funds. Over the years, I have run into mutual funds that embed a ladder concept into their interest rate management strategy, but it is far enough back in time that I can’t name any that do that now. In general, I think most bond mutual funds would be better off if they used some form of ladder to implement their interest rate strategy.

But to your question, yes, there is little difference, aside from fees, whether one owns a mutual fund with the same duration profile as a laddered portfolio.  When you deal with short portfolios, the duration statistic is very descriptive of the interest rate risk.

If someone is looking to invest for many years, in the present environment, stocks may be the better choice, but if limited to bonds, choose a portfio that replicates the time horizon on average.  Then as the horizon draws nearer, adjust to reflect the need for cash paid out.

That’s my best answer for now, though I am more than willing to answer other questions related to this.

Do Insurance Stocks Do Better than Average Over the Long-Run?

Wednesday, June 27th, 2012

Why should insurance companies be such a good place to invest?  That’s a great question, and I will try to outline an answer.  Before I do, let me draw a few distinctions:

  • I’m not talking about life companies, they are far more capital encumbered then P&C companies.
  • I am also not talking about title, mortgage, or finance insurers.  They are too risky, and that was my opinion in the early 2000s.
  • Health insurers have a different model, much more subject to regulation.
  • Many insurance companies that don’t survive 10 years as a public company do poorly.  They did not underwrite well.
  • Small companies tend to fail disproportionately.
  • We aren’t talking about specialty companies.

What I am talking about are non-microcap companies with stable P&C liability structures and conservative reserving.  Boring, maybe.  Simple, somewhat, but you try setting up a competitor to them.  It takes some doing.  That is the competitive advantage; it is the barrier to entry.  Few companies have diversified liabilities; fewer reserve conservatively.

Thus I highlight P&C companies with ten year track records.  Here are the good ones: ACE, Chubb, Cincinnati Financial, Donegal Group, HCC Insurance, Markel, ProAssurance, RLI, Selective Insurance, Travelers, United Fire Group, W.R. Berkley, Arch Capital, Alterra Capital Holdings, PartnerRe, Everest Re, Renaissance Re, White Mountains, Progressive, State Auto Financial, and Erie Indemnity.

And here are the trailing ones: American Financial Group, Baldwin & Lyons, EMC Insurance, Navigators Group, XL Group, Allegheny Corporation, American National, Allstate, and Horace Mann.

And two really lousy ones: CNA Insurance and Meadowbrook Insurance Group.

On the whole, the outperformers more than absorb the underperformers, though I can’t prove that, for these reasons:

  • Hasn’t happened much in a while, but P&C insurance companies do occasionally die & disappear.  Think of Reliance Insurance Company.
  • Sometimes P&C companies make very bad underwriting decisions, lose a dramatic amount of money, and their stock prices fall enough that they get taken over, e.g., PXRe would be an example.
  • I may be guilty of selection and survivor bias by sticking with diversified bigger firms that are at least 10 years old.  I know of a lot of smaller firms that flame out because they take too much underwriting risk due to hubris and/or inexperience.

To do a complete study, we would have to use the CRSP database, which has all of the data for stocks not currently living.  We would see the losses from insolvencies, and the losses/gains fhereof.  It would take place at the halfway point for US efforts, which would be 4 seconds ahead of the Greeks as they hurried to compete/complete at constant speeds.

That’s what would happen.  Now before I go, I want to leave charts behind for the stocks mentioned:





Well Below


So though I know many value investors think a lot of P&C insurers, my answer on whether they are a generally good industry to invest in is “possibly,” but not “certainly.”  There are advantages for sophisticated investors that can understand complex accounting and its limitations, as well as those that can sense whether a management team is conservative or not.  That may be part of the reason for how I limited the selection of companies above; I was trying to mimic what sort of companies tended to last a long time; they tend to be conservative.

That’s all for now; criticism is welcome.

Full disclosure: Long HCC , TRV

PS — I will be gone the next three days, and posting will be irregular, as it has been recently.

Don’t Blame Money Market Funds

Saturday, June 23rd, 2012

So SEC Chairman Mary Shapiro wants money market funds to use mark-to-market accounting, and publish a daily NAV.  Well, why not impose mark-to-market accounting on banks, and force them to report the fair market value of their surplus every day? Large depositors over the guaranty limit and the repo market might be interested in this data.  Oh wait, that’s procyclical, so many claim, even though it reveals cash flow mismatches, which are material to the running of a banking business.

There’s a lot of hypocrisy involved in the SEC’s proposals on money market funds.

  • Banks are a larger problem.  When money market funds fail, the losses are a couple percent on NAV, versus much larger on banks.
  • Having a balance sheet enables a bank to postpone the day of reckoning; there are more games to play.
  • Some banks run “money market funds” that are essentially savings accounts, but do not have identified pools of assets behind them.  In an insolvency, a holder of such is a general creditor after FDIC coverage.
  • Money market funds cost consumers a lot less than banks in order to provide transactional services.  In one sense, money market funds deserve to exist far more than banks — they have a very low asset liability mismatch, asset quality is very high, and they exist to pass through interest earnings on a short-term portfolio.

Money market funds should be treated like book value ETFs.  They should pass through interest net of fees, and impose credit events should the NAV fall below 0.995. [Link to my letter to the SEC]  This is a simple, stable solution, that would not require any regulation beyond that.  It would keep money market fund losses small, end deliver them to holders, not taxpayers. (Even indirectly, by borrowing from the Fed.)

So there are 300+ cases where the sponsors of money market funds put up money or offered loans where money market funds were about to break the buck.  Where Mary Shapiro sees weakness, I see strength.  Isn’t it great that financial organizations, without being required to do so by regulation, kick in their own funds or liquidity in order to preserve the interests of savers? Most banks could never do the same when they are about to go bust.

Money market funds are a way of avoiding the high expenses of banks, and offer savers a decent rate of return.  If there are losses, holders of the money market fund should bear it through a reduction in units, as described in my proposal, unless sponsors generously want to preserve their franchise.

Consumers get a better deal with money market funds.  Those that are in the pocket of the banks argue against money market funds.  I do not ever want the  government to bail out money market funds, and the US Government erred greatly when they did so in 2008.  Those holding money market funds should have borne their small losses.  There would have been little risk from letting money market funds deliver losses to holders.

Those losses were not the cause of the crisis, but the banks with their bad residential mortgage loans.  That was the crisis, and continues to be so, with so many mortgages underwater.

Sorted Weekly Tweets

Saturday, June 23rd, 2012

A note to all of the actuaries in the audience, all three of you ;) : an old friend from my GIC days is seeking a multi-talented actuary to work in the stable value business.  Must understand how wraps work, etc.  If interested, drop me a note, and I’ll send you the contact info.

On with the tweets:




  • May not last long $$ RT @John_Hempton: @AlephBlog Spain imposing on bank junior bonds but prefs in Santander still trading at par! Strange. Jun 23, 2012
  • Buying Europe Banks Is Easy for Herro as Cheap Stocks Fall Key question here is accounting quality; not a buyer $$ Jun 23, 2012
  • Spain Said to Weigh Imposing Losses on Junior Bank Bondholders Fine, but they won’t fund jr debt for 20yrs or so $$ Jun 23, 2012
  • Spanish Aid Plan Is Flawed, Says IMF IMF doesn’t like the complexity of the E-Zone, wants it 2 behave like a nation Jun 23, 2012
  • Debt crisis: Angela Merkel defies Latin Europe and the IMF on bond rescue She who pays the $$ calls the tunes Jun 23, 2012
  • What’s So Special About the Euro Currency Area? Currency unions don’t work; must centralize or die $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • Merkel Balks at Sovereign Debt Purchases to Overcome Crisis Physically, the crisis looks like it is wearing on Angela Jun 21, 2012
  • Spanish short-term debt costs reach alarm levels Yields high enough that Spain unlikely to grow out of the debt $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • Cyprus Said to Face Europe Pressure for $13 Billion Aid Who wants to maintain influence in Cyprus? Russia, E-zone? $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • ‘ @aarontask He might b right. Key Q is how much Germans/Nordics/Dutch view themselves as Europeans 1st rather than Germans/Nordics/Dutch $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Greek Leaders Poised to Agree on Three-Way Coalition It will be difficult for that coalition 2 hold together $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Mañana-nomics at Los Cabos Weak Europoliticians blame US, when their banking system was overlevered & malregulated $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • G20 summit: perils of a half-baked rescue for Spain and Italy E-zone not ready 2 take strong actions; don’t force it $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Is Spain past the point of no return? ‘’I suspect the ECB will have to be the buyer of last resort for Spanish bonds.’’ Jun 19, 2012
  • Saddling Spain With Bank Burden Repeats Irish Error Protect deposits, not bank bonds, preferreds, or stocks $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • “Which is why $JPM had the hedge there in the first place $$” Dimon Says ‘Firewalls’ May Halt Spread of Europe Crisis Jun 19, 2012
  • Germany set to allow eurozone bailout fund to buy troubled countries’ debt Last refuge of scoundrels:blame speculators Jun 19, 2012
  • François Hollande said meeting btw Ezone & Obama rescheduled4this morning2brief Americans on “mechanisms that allow us to fight speculation” Jun 19, 2012
  • Spanish Yields at 7% Show Investors Slamming Door Spain is slowly passing the “tipping point” into hopelessness. $$ Jun 18, 2012
  • Where is the relief? RT @jennablan: Where is the relief rally? Jun 18, 2012

FOMC Meeting/Press Conference


  • Fed Seen Extending Operation Twist and Avoiding Bond Buys Fed can’t do nothing, so it does something that is nothing Jun 21, 2012
  • RT @ezraklein: Hypothesis: Bernanke doesn’t do more because he doesn’t think he can. He says otherwise is because he doesn’t want the ma … Jun 20, 2012
  • Dr. Bernanke: Couldn’t increased unemployment be structural, after all, there is a lot more competition from labor in emerging markets? Jun 20, 2012
  • That’s all folks!!! Jun 20, 2012
  • Dr. Bernanke, Isn’t stagflation a possibility here? I mean, no one expected it in the ’70s either. $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Q for Bernanke: If the Fed ever does shrink its balance sheet, what effect will it have on the banks? $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Stocks trading off — correlated with future inflation rates; long Treasuries rallying nominal yields falling -> real rates stable-ish $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • What Bernanke is describing in terms of hedging and risk management has to be done in the insurance industry; actuarial risk analyses Jun 20, 2012
  • W/MBS rates, those mtges that are underwater don’t benefit, same for Alt-A & Jumbo; low rates don’t help many in residential real estate $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Effect of Tsy ylds on corporate yields is stronger 4 AAA-A bonds, moderate 4 BBB bonds, little 4 junk & the effects get weaker w/maturity $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • That’s the wrap up for the central tendencies and averages of the FOMC’s additional data release. Anyone find those summaries useful? $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Changes in Avg Target Federal Funds Rate at Year-End 2012-2014, Longer -0.07%, -0.10%, -0.22%, -0.09% $$ Levels: 0.30%, 0.50%, 1.11%, 4.11% Jun 20, 2012
  • Average appropriate timing of policy firming moved out 1.6 months to November 2013 $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Changes in PCE Inflation central tendency 2012-2014, Longer -0.4)%, -0.07%, -0.12%, 0% $$ Levels: 1.48%, 1.76%, 1.77%, 2.00% Jun 20, 2012
  • Changes in unemployment central tendency 2012-2014, Longer +0.18%, +0.20%, +0.24%, +0.03% $$ Levels: 8.10%, 7.71%, 7.28%, 5.60% Jun 20, 2012
  • Changes in real GDP growth central tendency 2012-2014, Longer -0.50%, -0.37%, -0.11%, -0.04% $$ Levels: 2.13%, 2.57%, 3.28%, 2.44% Jun 20, 2012
  • +1 RT @bondscoop: Steve Liesman is the Fed’s Helen Thomas Jun 20, 2012
  • Fed wants to see long TIPS up in price relative to long nominal Treasuries. Jun 20, 2012
  • @TheStalwart #FOMCGuesses OT extended, no QE3, central tendencies move back to where they were in January, shades lang down GDP, CPI, etc $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • C’mon, Ben, Just Say It; Please, Just Say QE3 Sad that equity guys beg 4 stimulus; think OT extends; no QE3 yet $$ Jun 20, 2012


Rest of the World


  • Glencore Protests Bolivia’s Move on Mine Bolivia has Venezuela envy; won’t end until Morales is shown 2b a fail. $$ Jun 23, 2012
  • Children of Mao’s wrath vie for power in China All of the current ruling class survived the Cultural Revolution $$ Jun 22, 2012
  • Riskier Bets Pitched to Asia’s Rising Rich Yield is the oldest scam in the books; Asia’s brokers fleece clients $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • China warns its rare earth reserves are declining I doubt this, but if true -> significant scarcity of rare earths $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Britain doomed, apparently Countries that don’t reset their systems through default, will experience money decay $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Suicides, Arrests Show Trouble at Korean Savings Banks Pride drives suicides, rather than confession of wrongdoing $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • The UN’s Internet Power Grab Never surrender an advantage for no gain; does the Obama administration get that? $$ Jun 18, 2012
  • The Return of Egypt’s ‘Deep State’ Islamists & liberals checkmated by Egyptian Army 4 now. Liberals s/b glad $$ Jun 17, 2012
  • @dpinsen Agreed, better H/L would have been: “Egyptian Army reveals full control, ends show that played w/democracy 2 smoke out enemies” $$ Jun 17, 2012
  • Noda Ends Japan Nuclear Freeze, Risking Voter Backlash at Polls He does the right thing, but will the voters agree $$ Jun 17, 2012




  • A History of Money Funds Let the critics of money market funds apply the same2banks; mark2market accounting. $$ Jun 23, 2012
  • Bank Investors Dismiss Moody’s Cuts as Years Too Late True. Moody’s should’ve done it in 2008; did politics stopthem? Jun 23, 2012
  • Citigroup Faces $5 Billion on Dollar’s Rise, Peabody Says So, on the heels of $JPM, $C has a currency mismatch? $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • Eminent domain for underwater mortgages could have biggest impact on banks Comments at end; disagreement welcomed $$ Jun 20, 2012


Central Banking


  • Bernanke Acknowledges Tsy Strategy @ Odds W/Fed Policy “Thx, Unca Ben 4letting us issue morre 30s” Ben:”Arrrgh!” $$ Jun 23, 2012
  • The Fed’s second best solution “collateral damage will mount, making the next policy steps even more excruciating.” Jun 21, 2012
  • Fed Born of Morgan’s Bailout Under Scrutiny After Dimon’s Loss How significant is it 4 Jamie D 2b on NY Fed board? $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • Krugman’s Intellectual Waterloo Suggested possible Fed stimulus: blow housing bubble 2replace tech bubble $$ Jun 17, 2012
  • Also, the last H/L could have been: “Bernanke’s GDP View Invalidated as Economy Slows” FOMC has been lousy economic forecasters lately $$ Jun 17, 2012
  • Bernanke’s Inflation View Validated as Commodities Fall Median & Trimmed mean CPIs mot falling, better measures $$ Jun 17, 2012


Asset Management


  • Pimco’s Gross Warns of Risk Assets as Aberdeen Avoids Stocks Bill Gross signs on to deflation late & promotes it $$ Jun 23, 2012
  • Private Equity Has Too Much Money to Spend on Homes Big buyers need to stay quiet if they want 2 make good returns $$ Jun 22, 2012
  • Simon Lack responds to AIMA’s hedge fund cheerleading Backfill bias, IRR vs Buy&Hold, high fees, survivor bias $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • At 40,000 feet, Fidelity’s Danoff ponders Groupons Danoff is a survivor; he’s right it’s lonely 2b a stockpicker $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • Very good point. Wall Street is a 1-note Sam RT @chadstarliper: Has there ever been a time when Wall St didn’t think stocks were “cheap?” $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Wall Street says stocks are bargains, but that assumes surging profits Or at least growing sales w/flat profit mgns $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • America’s $8T corporate debt market faces liquidity drought as banks retreat from the trade Shouldn’t b that bad $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • Equities entail less risk than ‘haven’ investments Ain’t necessarily true; think of the Great Depression or 1871 $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • Valuation Matters…. Equity vs Bonds Edition Earnings ylds v Tsy ylds unstable; Q-ratio, CAPE10, Price/resources bettr Jun 19, 2012
  • Biggest Stocks Beat S&P 500 Most in 13 Years as Valuations Fall Once valuations get so low, they must go up $$ Jun 18, 2012




  • DuPont selling Conoco at oil mkt trough $$RT @BarbarianCap: “Delta seals deal to buy Pennsylvania refinery” > hasn’t that been tried before? Jun 23, 2012
  • DuPont buying Conoco at oil mkt peak $$ RT @BarbarianCap: “Delta seals deal to buy Pennsylvania refinery” > hasn’t that been tried before? Jun 23, 2012
  • J.C. Penney Falls After Francis Leaves Amid Strategy Flop Rare setback 4 Ackman/Pershing on $JCP; retail is tough $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • Buffett Extends Real-Estate Bet With ResCap Pursuit Buffett is early, in my opinion, but has the capital to do it $$ Jun 18, 2012




  • US public retiree benefits gap grows to $1.38T Gap widened by $120 billion since last year; thx Ben 4 low discnt rates Jun 20, 2012
  • Joe Nocera Is Wrong About Woonsocket’s Crisis Harder2discharge muni “pension” bonds than renegotiate muni pensions $$ Jun 20, 2012
  • GM Seen Fueling Pension Deals as Employers Face Shortfall Hope $MET & $PRU survive; guaranty funds limited in size $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • Terminal funding of DB pension plans will be a growing phenomenon if corps/states bite bullet and kick in more $$ to fund annuity purchases Jun 19, 2012
  • Problem to annuitants is companies can go broke; no PBGC coverage of annuities, and state guarantees r usually limited 2 $100,000 total $$ Jun 19, 2012




  • Love the Leaker, Hate the Leak Value of releasing sensitive govt data to the public is in the eye of the beholder $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • How David Weidner Changed My Life @reformedbroker – how getting on @davidweidner ‘s Top 10 list gave him a big boost $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • +1 won’t watch RT @ReformedBroker: Bloomberg PR pushing their Meredith Whitney interview video hard today. They haven’t gotten the memo yet. Jun 19, 2012
  • Wrong: 20 rules that can save you from the Doomsday Cycle Why does Marketwatch give Paul Farrell space 2 write? $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • So long, suckers — I’m leaving Wall Street David Weidner: Some lessons from 15 years observing the industry $$ Jun 19, 2012




  • Liquidity, Noise, and Signal Shorter the time period-> higher ratio noise/signal; leads2bad trades @ turning points $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • ‘ @JATranfo Never criticized ECRI when out of favor; FWIW, I reverse-engineered their main model: industrial commod pxs & credit spreads $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • Lawmakers Push for Overhaul of IPO Process Every “fix” creates its own set of problems. Mania can hit auctions 2 $$ Jun 21, 2012
  • Yes $$ RT @Fullcarry: A point I have made many times in the past: the drop in yields the past decade is mostly due to a drop in real rates. Jun 20, 2012
  • Housing Starts in U.S. Fall 4.8% in May on Apartments Interesting contrary data; $EQR chart $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • Asians Top Immigration Class Certainly noticeable here in Ellicott City; most businesses have signs in Korean $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • Poorly reasoned: Court-Ordered Care — A Complication of Pregnancy 2 Avoid Mothers w/child in womb uniquely affect child Jun 18, 2012
  • Please follow @jarrodwilcox, He has taught me many things, and I respect him a great deal #FF Jun 17, 2012
  • A Jewish-Asian Couple’s Union Leads to a Scholarly Interest in Intermarriage Both ethnic groups prize education $$ Jun 17, 2012




  • DavidMerkel’s discussion on “The New Yorker’s Newest Writer Is a Big Self-Plagiarist” Writing belongs2those that paid Jun 20, 2012
  • “High energy particle physics is only a small part of science, and not adequate to measure the…” — David_Merkel Jun 20, 2012
  • “Please, accidents per passenger mile would be better, rather than: “He also pointed to the fact…” — David_Merkel Jun 20, 2012
  • RE: @bloombergview Maybe DC city govt should start a reality TV show, w/prizes 2 the official who commits the most cr… Jun 20, 2012
  • RE: @bloombergview  How will you deal with deferral of individual taxes on investment from DC plans, unrealized CGs, … Jun 20, 2012
  • “Cool picture, Ed. Thanks for sharing it.” — David_Merkel Jun 19, 2012
  • “Hitting the fiscal cliff won’t happen, and that’s too bad, because we need to discuss long-term imbalances” — D_Merkel Jun 19, 2012
  • “Here is a proposal for how rating agencies could be eliminated:…” — David_Merkel Jun 19, 2012
  • “I trust ratings agencies more than mismanaged governments. Ratings are needed to provide…” — David_Merkel Jun 19, 2012
  • “If this is representative of what the ruling Greek coalition will do, the government will fail…” — David_Merkel Jun 19, 2012
  • “Much as we may dislike financial fraud, suggesting that those in the US that mismanaged their banks…” — David_Merkel Jun 19, 2012
  • ‘ @FilmCriticOne You say u want tax reform, but ur willing2let value grow untaxed through deferral? Get real; ability2defer is the issue $$ Jun 16, 2012


Dimon for Fed Secretary


  • @dlevineMW @moorehn and pay cut. The same rumors were applied to Hank Greenberg $AIG 4 Tsy Secretary user Bush, Sr. Said the same then $$ Jun 19, 2012
  • Jamie kind2let us live in his world ;) RT @ReformedBroker He’s hedging the Senate w/the House right now, y’all r just pawns in a bigger game Jun 19, 2012
  • Why should Jamie accept the demotion? $$ RT @moorehn: This is just Jamie practicing for confirmation hearings as Treasury Secretary, right? Jun 19, 2012


Tax Policy


  • Tax Panels Turn Focus to Investments Best poss is lowering corp tax rates, equalizing all tax rates for individuals Jun 23, 2012
  • How to Kill the Corporate-Income Tax Evens out personal income tax rates by class. Good, but what about deferral? $$ Jun 20, 2012




Book Review: The Decline and Fall of Europe

Thursday, June 21st, 2012

This book is written by a man who wants to see the European experiment succeed, but is not confident that it will succeed.  I think this is a fair book on the topic; it does not absorb all of my biases on why I think the Eurozone is hopeless: a) Currency unions have never worked; they must either become a nation, or break up.  b) I have a saying, “Governments are smaller than Economies, and Economies are smaller than Cultures.”

This saying puts things in their place.  Government can’t in the long run prevent things that are economically successful, those things fill human needs.  But cultures are bigger than economies; we don’t live to consume. We live for ideals.  Different cultures have different ideals, and it means that a purely individualistic or collectivist view of economics won’t be accepted in the Eurozone.  They muddle in the middle.

The Eurozone is a political and economic experiment, and was pretty successful and harmless until they began to seek a common currency.  Yes, there were other problems, bureaucrats in Brussels, seeking human perfection though regulation, helped to strangulate a previously more competitive Eurozone economy.  That said, the common currency offered some offsetting advantages of efficiency.

Other Troubles

But there are other troubles.  There are unaffordable pensions in many countries that lie behind that economic problems.  As one who is 51, and well off, why should anyone, aside from oil wildcatters, who endure a lot of physical stress retire at age 50 on the largess of the taxpayers, that is, if you have taxpayers.

Even retiring at age 60 is ridiculous, which France has recently reverted to from 62.  France will never be able to afford it as a nation.

But then there are cultural issues: do you care what your laws are?  Would you care if immigrants are ruled by Islamic Law?  Would you care if your grandchildren, a minority like the Maronites (Roman Catholics) in Lebanon, are ruled by Islamic Law?

The Main Economic Issue

After all of the strangu-regulation, what if economies can’t grow at levels sufficient to exceed the rates at which they borrow?  They slowly fail, as debts grow, and doubts about repayment grow.

In the Euro-zone this is particularly pertinent, because countries can’t depreciate; they must repay in Euros.  When the Euro was introduced it was heaven for many nations, because they could borrow cheaply.  Eventually, they had too much debt, and lenders rebelled.

This is the nature of an area that is not a natural currency area — the Eurozone.  This was an experiment doomed to fail.


None, but I would be a full Euro-sceptic.  This can’t work.  More effective human labor is always better than less.

Who would benefit from this book:   If you want to learn about the problems in the Eurozone from someone that is fair, you will find it here.  If you want to, you can buy the book here: The Decline and Fall of Europe.

Full disclosure: The PR flack asked me if I wanted the book, and was kind enough to send me the book.

If you enter Amazon through my site, and you buy anything, I get a small commission.  This is my main source of blog revenue.  I prefer this to a “tip jar” because I want you to get something you want, rather than merely giving me a tip.  Book reviews take time, particularly with the reading, which most book reviewers don’t do in full, and I typically do. (When I don’t, I mention that I scanned the book.  Also, I never use the data that the PR flacks send out.)

Most people buying at Amazon do not enter via a referring website.  Thus Amazon builds an extra 1-3% into the prices to all buyers to compensate for the commissions given to the minority that come through referring sites.  Whether you buy at Amazon directly or enter via my site, your prices don’t change.


Redacted Version of the June 2012 FOMC Statement

Wednesday, June 20th, 2012
April 2012June 2012Comments
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately.Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately this year.“This year” makes it more of a historical statement, and shades the GDP view down.
Labor market conditions have improved in recent months; the unemployment rate has declined but remains elevated.However, growth in employment has slowed in recent months, and the unemployment rate remains elevated.Shades labor employment down.  Still thinks there is growth in employment rate.
Household spending and business fixed investment have continued to advance. Despite some signs of improvement, the housing sector remains depressed.


Business fixed investment has continued to advance. Household spending appears to be rising at a somewhat slower pace than earlier in the year. Despite some signs of improvement, the housing sector remains depressed.Shades down household spending.
Inflation has picked up somewhat, mainly reflecting higher prices of crude oil and gasoline. However, longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.Inflation has declined, mainly reflecting lower prices of crude oil and gasoline, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.Shades down  their view of inflation. TIPS are showing virtually unchanged inflation expectations since the last meeting. (5y forward 5y inflation implied from TIPS.)
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability.Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability.No change.
The Committee expects economic growth to remain moderate over coming quarters and then to pick up gradually. Consequently, the Committee anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline gradually toward levels that it judges to be consistent with its dual mandate.The Committee expects economic growth to remain moderate over coming quarters and then to pick up very gradually. Consequently, the Committee anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only slowly toward levels that it judges to be consistent with its dual mandate.Shades down its views of future GDP growth.
Strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook.Furthermore, strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook.No real change.
The increase in oil and gasoline prices earlier this year is expected to affect inflation only temporarily, and the Committee anticipates that subsequently inflation will run at or below the rate that it judges most consistent with its dual mandate.The Committee anticipates that inflation over the medium term will run at or below the rate that it judges most consistent with its dual mandate.Declares victory in their view on energy prices.
To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy.To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy.No change.
In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions–including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run–are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions–including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run–are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.No change.
The Committee also decided to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in September.The Committee also decided to continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities. Specifically, the Committee intends to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years at the current pace and to sell or redeem an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less. This continuation of the maturity extension program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.Extends Operation Twist for six months.  Doesn’t say how much.
The Committee is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction.The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities.I guess the renewal of Operation Twist changes the language here.
The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.The Committee is prepared to take further action as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability. 
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Dennis P. Lockhart; Sandra Pianalto; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Daniel K. Tarullo; John C. Williams; and Janet L. Yellen.Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Dennis P. Lockhart; Sandra Pianalto; Jerome H. Powell; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Jeremy C. Stein; Daniel K. Tarullo; John C. Williams; and Janet L. Yellen.Adds in the two new doves; can’t have enough groupthink.
Voting against the action was Jeffrey M. Lacker, who does not anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate through late 2014.Voting against the action was Jeffrey M. Lacker, who opposed continuation of the maturity extension program.Does this mean Lacker is on board with policy accommodation through 2014?  Don’t think so, but maybe a reporter should ask.



  • Operation Twist is extended for six months, but there is no amount set for it.  Looks like an oversight, then again, they may not have a lot of bonds three years and shorter to sell.
  • The changes are significant, because in the space of one meeting, they went from things are good to things are bad.  They shaded down their views on GDP growth, employment, inflation, and household spending.
  • In my opinion, I don’t think holding down longer-term rates on the highest-quality debt will have any impact on lower quality debts, which is where most of the economy finances itself.
  • Also, the reinvestment in Agency MBS should have limited impact because so many owners are inverted, or ineligible for financing backed by the GSEs, and implicitly the government, even with the recently announced refinancing changes.
  • The key variables on Fed Policy are capacity utilization, unemployment, inflation trends, and inflation expectations.  As a result, the FOMC ain’t moving rates up, absent increases in employment, or a US Dollar crisis.  Labor employment is the key metric.
  • Do they want the yield on 30 year TIPS to go negative?  Looks that way.
  • GDP growth is not improving much if at all, and the unemployment rate improvement comes more from discouraged workers.  Inflation has moderated, but whether it will stay that way is another question.

Questions for Dr. Bernanke:

  • Is it possible that you don’t really know what would have worked to solve the Great Depression, and you are just committing an entirely new error that will result in a larger problem for us later?
  • Why do think extending the period of accommodation by a little more than two years will have any significant effect on the economy, aside from stock and bond prices?
  • Discouraged workers are a large factor in the falling unemployment rate. Why do you think the economy is doing well?
  • Couldn’t increased unemployment be structural, after all, there is a lot more competition from labor in emerging markets?
  • Why do you think that holding down longer-term rates on the highest-quality debt will have any impact on lower quality debts, which is where most of the economy finances itself?
  • Why will reinvestment in Agency MBS help the economy significantly?  Doesn’t that only help solvent borrowers on the low end of housing, who don’t really need the help?
  • Isn’t stagflation a possibility here?  I mean, no one expected it in the ‘70s either.
  • Could we end up with another debt bubble from keeping short rates so low?
  • If the Fed ever does shrink its balance sheet, what effect will it have on the banks?

Interview with Howard Marks

Wednesday, June 20th, 2012

As you might know, I reviewed Howard Marks’ excellent book The Most Important Thing, and its enhanced version, The Most Important Thing Illuminated.  Some PR flacks are more tenacious, and some less so.  Some come to me prior to publication, and some after.  Some represent an amazing author and book, others less so.

Even though the PR flack came to me after publication, she was tenacious, and offered me an interview with Howard Marks, Chairman of Oaktree Capital.  How could I refuse?

Now, I need to offer one apology before providing the link to the half hour audio interview.  If you read Howard Marks’ newsletters you know that he runs a shop that focuses on bonds, particularly high yield, convertible, and distressed debt.  But almost all of the principles that he puts forth apply to equity value investing as well, and so I assumed that he did some of that as well.  I should have looked at Oaktree’s strategies, and seen that they do little in vanilla asset classes like domestic US equities.

That invalidated a number of questions that I asked Mr. Marks via e-mail, but I had enough good questions to fill out a good half hour.  One final note: during the interview, he needed to take phone calls twice, and I edited those out of the audio file.  They took place near minutes eight and twenty-one.

With no further ado, here is my interview with Howard Marks:

Howard Marks Interview

Best of the Aleph Blog, Part 17

Tuesday, June 19th, 2012

These articles appeared between February and April 2011:

On the Percentage of Market Cap held by Domestic Stock ETFs


  • Domestic stock ETFs tend to pick more volatile stocks.
  • Domestic stock ETFs tend to pick stocks held by major institutions.
  • Domestic stock ETFs tend to pick stocks less held by insiders.  (They tend to be more boring.)

Goes Down Double-Speed

Bear markets move at 1.9x the rate of bull markets. (double speed)

Consider the Boom in the Bust; Consider the Bust in the Boom

We would all be better off if policymakers thought at least half a cycle ahead in the credit cycle. Sadly, they are linear thinkers, and would be better off working at the county landfill, if they qualified for such authority.

Critical Analysis of Buffett’s Annual Letter

Critical Analysis of Buffett’s Annual Report

Analyzes Berkshire Hathaway in 2011.  Points at the growth in debt at BRK, and concentration risk in the subsidiaries.

Musings on Yield

Why you should not use yield as a criterion for investment.

On the Usefulness of Yield Spreads

So what does this tell us?

  • There is a credit factor that effects yields, and the effect on Baa bonds is roughly 1.5x that of Aaa bonds.
  • As Treasury yields get lower, Baa bond yields rise at roughly 45% of the rate.  There is the nominal yield need — even Baa bonds tend to need a certain nominal yield, particularly for 20+ year bonds.
  • Present yield levels are fair for long Baa bonds, to the extent that Moody’s measures them accurately.

On Con Men

So avoid complex investments.  Particularly avoid investments that you don’t understand.  At minimum, find a competent friend, or some neutral party that will look at the deal.  If you can’t find such a friend/party, don’t do the deal.  The friend is important, because he does not want you to come to harm, or lose you as a friend if things go bad.

Three Years from Now

There are real advantages to managing for the intermediate term.

Responding to a Bright Reader

Why I started a bond product.

Things are not as good as they look

Analyzing economic statistics when they don’t sound right.

Limits: Models, Governments, and Central Banks

Most writers say the governments and central banks are all-powerful.  I disagree, and I try to explain why.

Regarding David Sokol

Regarding David Sokol, Redux

Regarding David Sokol, Part 3

Regarding David Sokol, Part 4

The growing sentiment, though ahead of the crowd, that David Sokol should leave Berkshire Hathaway.

Everything Old is New Again in Bonds

On unconstrained mandates and managing for total returns with bonds.

When I was Young

What I went through in investing in my younger days.  Taught me a lot.

When Everything is Strong

When Everything is Strong, Redux

When the only thing weak is high quality bonds, what do you do?

It Would Have Happened Already, Redux

What do you do when all you hear are consensus opinions?



David Merkel is an investment professional, and like every investment professional, he makes mistakes. David encourages you to do your own independent "due diligence" on any idea that he talks about, because he could be wrong. Nothing written here, at RealMoney, Wall Street All-Stars, or anywhere else David may write is an invitation to buy or sell any particular security; at most, David is handing out educated guesses as to what the markets may do. David is fond of saying, "The markets always find a new way to make a fool out of you," and so he encourages caution in investing. Risk control wins the game in the long run, not bold moves. Even the best strategies of the past fail, sometimes spectacularly, when you least expect it. David is not immune to that, so please understand that any past success of his will be probably be followed by failures.

Also, though David runs Aleph Investments, LLC, this blog is not a part of that business. This blog exists to educate investors, and give something back. It is not intended as advertisement for Aleph Investments; David is not soliciting business through it. When David, or a client of David's has an interest in a security mentioned, full disclosure will be given, as has been past practice for all that David does on the web. Disclosure is the breakfast of champions.

Additionally, David may occasionally write about accounting, actuarial, insurance, and tax topics, but nothing written here, at RealMoney, or anywhere else is meant to be formal "advice" in those areas. Consult a reputable professional in those areas to get personal, tailored advice that meets the specialized needs that David can have no knowledge of.

 Subscribe in a reader

 Subscribe in a reader (comments)

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Seeking Alpha Certified

Top markets blogs award

The Aleph Blog

Top markets blogs Bull, Boards & Blogs

Blog Directory - Blogged

IStockAnalyst supporter

All Economists Contributor

Business Finance Blogs
OnToplist is optimized by SEO
Add blog to our blog directory.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin