Search Results for: problems compound interest

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (6)

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (6)

Posted on by David Merkel
Doctored Photo Credit: Marvin Isidore Macatol || And I say this is heresy!

=================================

My last post produced the following question:

What if your time horizon was 60 years? Would a 5% real return be achievable?

I am answering this as part of an irregular “think deeper” series on the problems of modeling investment over the very long term… the last entry was roughly six years ago. ?It’s a good series of five articles, and this is number six.

On to the question. ?The model forecasts over a ten-year period, and after that returns return to the long run average — about 9.5%/year nominal. ?The naive answer would then be something like this: the model says over a 60-year period you should earn about 8.85%/year, considering that the first ten years, you should earn around 5.63%/year. ?(Nominally, your initial investment will grow to be 161x+ as large.) ? If you think this, you can earn a 5% real return if inflation over the 60 years averages 3.85%/year or less. ?(Multiplying your capital in real terms by 18x+.)

Simple, right?

Now for the problems with this. ?Let’s start with the limits of math. ?No, I’m not going to teach you precalculus, though I have done that for a number of my kids. ?What I am saying is that math reveals, but it also conceals. ?In this case the math assumes that there is only one variable that affects returns for ten years — the proportion of investor asset held in stocks. ?The result basically says that over a ten-year period, mean reversion will happen. ?The proportion of investor asset held in stocks will return to an average level, and returns similar to the historical average will come?thereafter.

Implicitly, this assumes that the return series underlying the regression is the perfectly normal return series, and the future will be just like it, only more so. ?Let me tell you about some special things involved in the history of the last 71 years:

  • We have not lost a war on our home soil.
  • We have not had socialism to the destructive levels experienced by China under Mao, the USSR. North Korea, Cuba, etc. ?(Ordinary socialism isn’t so damaging, though there are ethical reasons for not going that way. ?People deserve freedom, not guarantees. ?Note that stock returns in moderate socialist countries have been roughly as high as those in the US. ?See the book Triumph of the Optimists.)
  • We have continued to have enough children, and they have become moderately productive workers. ?Also, we have welcomed a lot of hard working and creative people to the US.
  • Technology has continued to improve, and along with it, labor productivity.
  • Adequate energy to multiply force and distribute knowledge is inexpensively available.
  • We have not experienced hyperinflation.

There are probably a few things that I have missed. ?This is what I mean when I say the math conceals. ?Every mathematical calculation abstracts quantity away from every other attribute, and considers it to be the only one worth analyzing. ?Qualitative analysis is tougher and more necessary than quantitative analysis — we need it to give meaning to mathematical analyses. ?(What are the limits? ?What is it good for? ?How can I use it? ?How can I use it ethically?)

If you’ve read me long enough, you know that I view economies and financial markets as ecosystems. ?Ecosystems are stable within limits. ?Ecosystems also can only develop so quickly; there may be no limits to growth, but there are limits to the speed of growth in mature economies and financial systems.

Thus the question: will these excellent conditions continue? ?My belief is that mankind never truly changes, and that history teaches us that all governments and most cultures eventually die. ?When they do, most or all economic arrangements tend to break, especially complex ones like financial markets.

But here are three more limits, and they are more local:

  • Can you really hold for 60 years, reinvesting and never taking a material amount?out?
  • Will the number investing in the equity markets remain small?
  • Will stock be offered and retired at ordinary prices?

 

Most people can’t lock money away for that long without touching it to some degree. ?Some of the assets?may get liquidated because of panic, personal emergency needs, etc. ?Besides, why be a miser? ?Warren Buffett, one of the greatest compounders of all time, might have ended up happier if he had spent less time compounding, and more time on his family. ?It would have been better to take a small?part of it, and use it to make others happy then, and not wait to be the one of the most famous philanthropists of the 21st century before touching it.

Second, returns may be smaller in the future because more pursue them. ?One reason?the rewards for being a capitalist are large on average is that?there are relatively few of them. ?Also, I have sometimes wondered if stock returns will fall when the whole world is employed, and there is no more cheap labor to be had. ?Should that bold scenario ever come to pass, labor would have more bargaining power in aggregate, and profits would likely fall.

Finally, you have to recognize that the equity return statistics are somewhat overstated. ?I’m not sure how much, but I think it is enough to reduce returns by 1%+. ?Equity tends to be offered for initial purchase expensively, and tends to get retired inexpensively. ?Businessmen are rational and tend to go public when stock valuations are high, pay employees in stock when valuations are high, and do stock deals when valuations are high. ?They tend to go private when stock valuations are low, pay employees cash in ordinary times, and do cash?deals when valuations are low.

As a result, though someone that buys and holds the stock index does best, less money is in the index when stocks are low, and a lot more when stocks are high.

Inflation Over 60 Years?

I mentioned the risk of hyperinflation above, but who can tell what inflation will do over 60 years? ?If the market survives, I feel confident that stocks would outperform inflation — but how much is the open question. ?We haven’t paid the price for loose monetary policy yet. ?A 1% rise in inflation tends to cut stock returns by 2% for a year in real terms, but then businesses adjust and pass through higher prices. ?Vice-versa when inflation falls.

Right now the 30-year forecast for inflation is around 2.1%/year, but that has bounced around considerably even within a calm environment. ?My estimate of inflation over a 60-year period would be the weakest element of this analysis; you can’t tell what the politicians and central bankers will do, and they aren’t sure themselves.

Summary

Yes, you could earn 5% real returns on your money over a 60-year period… potentially. ?It would take hard work, discipline, cleverness, frugality, and a cast iron stomach for risk. ?You would need to be one of the few doing it. ?It would also require the continued prosperity of the US and global economies. ?We don’t prosper in a vacuum.

Thus in closing I will tell you that yes, you could do it, but there is a large probability of failure. ?Don’t count on buying that grand villa on the Adriatic Sea in your eighties, should you have the strength to enjoy it.

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (5)

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (5)

Posted on by David Merkel

This is a continuation of an irregular series which you can find here.? Maybe if I were more scientific, I would have called it “All Exponential Growth Processes Run Into Constraints and Threats,” or if I were more poetic, “Nothing Lasts Forever — Nothing Grows to the Sky.”

Regardless, simple modeling is the bane of long-duration financial calculations.? I remember talking with some friends who served on a charitable board with me, about some investment grade long bonds (11-30 years) that I had purchased for a life insurance client that yielded 7-9% in late 1999.? They said to me that it was foolish to lock up money for so long in bonds, when you could earn so much more in stocks.? My three comments to them were:

  • Prohibitive for life insurers to hold equities
  • At current levels of the market, the yield of these bonds more than compensates for the possibility of capital growth in equities (valuations are stretched)
  • The risk in the bonds is a lot lower.

And, I said we ought to shift shift our charity’s asset allocation to more bonds, as we were invested past the maximum of our guidelines in equities.? They looked in the rearview mirror and said that we were doing fabulous.? Why change success?

I was outvoted; I was a one-man minority.? There are a lot of people who would have loved to make that change in hindsight, but done is done.? I ended up leaving the board a year later over a related issue.

Now, don’t think that I am advising the same in 2011.? We may be headed for significant inflation or deflation; it is difficult to tell which.? Bonds offer little competition to equities here.? Commodities and cash may be better, but I am reluctant to be too dogmatic.? If the economy turns down again, long Treasuries would be best.

Here’s the difficulty: most people have been trained to think at least one of a few things that are wrong:

  • That we can use simple models to forecast future outcomes.
  • That average people are capable of avoiding fear and greed when it comes to investing.
  • That financial markets are random in the sense that last period’s return has no effect on the returns of future periods.
  • Over long periods of time, average investors can beat long Treasuries by more than 2%/year.? (Corollary to the idea that the equity premium is 4-6% versus 0-2%/year over high quality bonds.)
  • That financial markets are expressions of what is going on in the real economy.
  • That the real economy tends toward stability
  • That government actions make the real economy more stable

I’m prompted to write this because of two articles that I ran across in the last day: Retiring Boomers Find 401(k) Plans Fall Short, and Stay Out of the ROOM (registration required).

I’ve written about this before in many places, including Ancient and Modern: The Retirement Tripod.? And yet, when I wrote about these issues 20 years ago, one of the things that I tried to point out was that as the demographic bulge retired, it would be difficult for homes and asset markets to throw off the returns necessary, because there would not be enough buyers for the assets/homes.? If a large portion of the population wants to convert assets into a stream of income — guess what?? They are forced sellers, and yields that they will get will be compressed as a result.

In a situation like that, those that are better off, and can delay turning all of their assets into an earnings stream should be disproportionately better off.? As with corporations, so with individuals/families: those with slack assets and flexibility are able to deal with volatility better than those for whom the environment must be stable/favorable for the plan to succeed.

Now, the Wall Street Journal article points at the problems of 401(k) plans.? What they say is true, but the same is true of other types of defined contribution and defined benefit plans.? When assets underperform, and/or investors make bad choices, guess what?? The pain has to be compensated for somehow:

  • 401(k): They will work longer, maybe all of the rest of their lives, and cut back on expenses and dreams.
  • Non-contributory DC: maybe the employer will ask them to kick in voluntarily, or he might give more.? Also same as 401(k)…
  • Private sector DB plans: employers may contribute more, or they may terminate them.
  • Public sector DB plans: Taxes may rise, spending cuts enacted, forced contributions to retiree plans negotiated, plans terminated for a 457 plan, partial plan termination, job cuts, funny accounting practices (worse than the private sphere), brinksmanship over debts, etc.

Note that one of the answers is not “take more risk.”? First, risk and return are virtually uncorrelated in practice.? Only when enough people realize that might risk and return become positively correlated.? Second, there are times to increase and decrease risk exposure.? Typical people won’t want to do that, because of euphoria (the example of my friends above) and panic.? The time to add to high risk assets is when no one wants to touch a high yield bond.? More broadly, always look for asset classes that throw off the best cash flow yields, conservatively estimated, over the next ten-plus years.? Be sure and factor in the likelihood for economic regime changes and capital loss, inflation, deflation, etc.

Good asset allocation marries the time horizon of an investor to the forecasts for future returns, conservatively stated, and considers what could go wrong.? At present, investment opportunities are average-ish.? I would be wary of stretching for yield here, or raising my risk exposure in equities.? Stick with high quality.

And, for those that are retired, I would be wary of taking too much into income.? I have a simple formula for how much one could take from an endowment at maximum:

  • 10 Year Treasury Yield
  • Plus a credit spread — 2% if spreads are sky-high, 1% if they are good, 0.5% if they are tight.
  • less losses and fees of 0.5% — higher if investment expenses are over 0.25%.

Not very scientific, but I think it is realistic.? At a 3.5% 10-yr T-note yield, that puts me at a 4% maximum withdrawal rate, given a 1% credit spread.? This attempts to marry withdrawals to alternative uses for capital in the market.? You may withdraw more when opportunities are high, and less when they are low.? (But who can be flexible enough to have a maximum spending policy that varies over time?)

Now some of the advanced models that calculate odds of retiring successfully are a step in the right direction, but they also need to reflect demographics, time-correlation of returns, regime-shifting returns/economics, etc.? Things don’t move randomly in markets; that doesn’t mean I know which way things are going, but it does mean I should be cautious unless the market is offering me a fat pitch to hit.

These statements apply to governments as well, and their financial security programs.? In aggregate, investments can’t outgrow growth in GDP by much, unless labor takes a progressively lower share of national income.? (And who knows, but that the pressure on union DB plans to earn high returns might lead to takeovers/layoffs in private firms…)? The real economy and the financial economy are one over the long haul, but can drift apart considerably in the intermediate-term.

In summary, any long promise/analysis/plan made must reflect the realities that I mention here.? We’ve spent years on the illusions generated by assuming high returns off of financial assets.? Now with the first Baby Boomers trying to retire, the reality has arrived — sorry, not everyone in a large birth cohort can retire comfortably.? Wish it could be otherwise, but the economy as a whole can’t generate enough to make that proposition work.

I don’t intend that this series have more parts, but if one strikes me, I will write again.

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (4) (and more)

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (4) (and more)

Posted on by David Merkel

At the meeting of the eight bloggers and the US Treasury, one of the differences was whether the recovery was real or not.? The Treasury officials pointed to the financial markets, and the bloggers pointed at the real economy (unemployment and capacity utilization).

With T-bills near/below zero, I feel it is reasonable to trot out an old piece of mine about the last recession.? But I will quote most of it here:

I posted this on RealMoney on 5/6/2005, when everyone was screaming for the FOMC to stop raising rates because the ?auto companies were?dying.?

/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-

On Oct. 2, 2002, one week before the market was going to turn, the gloom was so thick you could cut it with a knife. What would blow up next?

A lot of heavily indebted companies are feeling weak, and the prices for their debt reflected it. I thought we were getting near a turning point; at least, I hoped so. But I knew what I was doing for lunch; I was going to the Baltimore Security Analysts? Society meeting to listen to the head of the Richmond Fed, Al Broaddus, speak.

It was a very optimistic presentation, one that gave the picture that the Fed was in control, and don?t worry, we?ll pull the economy out of the ditch. When the Q&A time came up, I got to ask the second-to-last question. (For those with a Bloomberg terminal, you can hear Broaddus?s full response, but not my question, because I was in the back of the room.) My question (going from memory) went something like this:

I recognize that current Fed policy is stimulating the economy, but it seems to have impact in only the healthy areas of the economy, where credit spreads are tight, and stimulus really isn?t needed. It seems the Fed policy has almost no impact in areas where credit spreads are wide, and these are the places that need the stimulus. Is it possible for the Fed to provide stimulus to the areas of the economy that need it, and not to those that don?t?

It was a dumb question, one that I knew the answer to, but I was trying to make a point. All the liquidity in the world doesn?t matter if the areas that you want to stimulate have impaired balance sheets. He gave a good response, the only surviving portion of it I pulled off of Bloomberg: ?There are very definite limits to what the Federal Reserve can do to affect the detailed spectrum of interest rates,? Broaddus said. People shouldn?t ?expect too much from monetary policy? to steer the economy, he said.

When I got back to the office, I had a surprise. Treasury bonds had rallied fairly strongly, though corporates were weak as ever and stocks had fallen further. Then I checked the bond news to see what was up. Bloomberg had flashed a one-line alert that read something like, ?Broaddus says don?t expect too much from monetary policy.? Taken out of context, Broaddus?s answer to my question had led to a small flight-to-safety move. Wonderful, not. Around the office, the team joked, ?Next time you talk to a Fed Governor, let us know, so we can make some money off it??

PS ? ?Before Broaddus answered, he said something to the effect of: ?I?m glad the media is not here, because they always misunderstand the ability of the Fed to change things.? ?A surprise to the Bloomberg, Baltimore Sun, and at least one other journalist who were there.

/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-

And now to the present application:

Why are commodities rising amid surplus conditions in storage?? Why is it reasonable to take over corporations when it is not reasonable to expand organically?? We are in a position where yields on short? Treasuries are nonexistent, investment grade and junk yields are low for corporates, and equities are rallying, but there is little growth, or some shrinkage in productive capacity.? Why?

The liquidity offered by the Fed is being used by speculators for financial positions, levering up relatively safe positions, rather than speculating on areas that are underwater, like housing and commercial real estate.? This is consistent with prior experience.? When the Fed does not allow a significant recession to occur, one proportionate to the amount of bad loans made, but comes to the rescue to reflate, what gets reflated is the healthy parts of the economy that absorb additional leverage, not the part that is impaired because they can’t benefit from low rates.? They have too much debt already relative to the true value of their assets.

That is why a booming stock market does not portend a good economy.? Banks aren’t lending to fund new growth.? They are lending to collapse capacity through takeovers.? ROE is rising from shrinking the equity base, not by increasing sales and profits.

-==-=–=-=-=-==-=–=-=-=-=-=-=-==-

There is another current application:

Why do we buy commodities as investments?? Is it that we fear inflation in the short or long run?? Is it that it is a proxy for future prices for consumption in retirement, so we are hedging the future price level in a dirty way?

Think about it.? How do you transfer present resources to the future?? Most consumable goods can’t be stored, or require significant cost for storage.? Services can’t be stored; elderly people can’t store up health care.

Storage occurs through building up productive capacity that will be wanted by other at a later date, such that they will want to trade current goods and services for your productive capacity.? Storage also occurs by purchasing goods that do keep their value, and then trading them for goods and services you need when the time come to consume.

That is how one preserves value over time, and it is not easy.? It will be even harder if there are such disruptions to the economy that markets that are virtual do not survive.? (I.e. paper promises are exchanged, but their is significant failure to deliver at maturity.)

-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

In an environment where the government is playing such a large role in the economy, it is difficult to see how one can invest for the long term — when we are twisted between deflation and inflation, rational calculations are circumscribed, and simple judgments, such as buying out a competitor and shrinking the overall balance sheet are made.? In one sense, that is the rational thing.? Less capacity is needed.? But unemployment will rise.

That’s sad, but wage rates may be too high for some to be employed, given the lack of demand.? I view this as true in aggregate, but people that are aggressive in seeking employment are able to do much better.? I have seen it.? Even in a bad market, those that strive intelligently get hired.

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (3)

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (3)

Posted on by David Merkel

This post should end the series, at least for now.? Tonight I want to talk about the limits to compounding growth.? Drawing from an old article of mine freely available at TSCM, I quote? the following regarding talking to management teams:

What single constraint on the profitable growth of your enterprise would you eliminate if you could?

Companies tend to grow very rapidly until they run into something that constrains their growth. Common constraints are:

  • insufficient demand at current prices
  • insufficient talent for some critical labor resource at current prices
  • insufficient supply from some critical resource supplier at current prices (the “commodity” in question could be iron ore, unionized labor contracts, etc.)
  • insufficient fixed capital (e.g., “We would refine more oil if we could, but our refineries are already running at 102% of rated capacity. We would build another refinery if we could, but we’re just not sure we could get the permits. Even if we could get the permits, we wonder if long-term pricing would make it profitable.”)
  • insufficient financial capital (e.g., “We’re opening new stores as fast as we can, but we don’t feel that it is prudent to borrow more at present, and raising equity would dilute current shareholders.”)

There are more, but you get the idea.

Again, the intelligent analyst has a reasonable idea of the answer before he asks the question. Part of the exercise is testing how businesslike management is, with the opportunity to learn something new in terms of the difficulties that a management team faces in raising profits.

As with biological processes, when there are unlimited resources, and no predators, growth of populations is exponential.? But there are limits to business and investment profits because of competition for customers or suppliers, and good untried ideas are scarce.? Once a company has saturated its markets, it needs a new highly successful product to keep the growth up. Perhaps international expansion will work, or maybe not?? Are there new marketing channels, alternative uses, etc?

Trying to maintain a consistently high return on equity [ROE] over a long period of time is a fools bargain and I’ll use an anecdote from a company I know well, AIG.? I was pricing a new annuity product for AIG, and I noticed the pattern for the ROE of the product was not linear — it fell through the surrender charge period, and then jumped to a high level after the surrender charge period was over.

I scratched my head, and said “How can I make a decision off of that?”? I decided to create a new measure called constant return on equity [CROE], where I adjusted for capital employed, and calculated the internal rate of return of the free cash flows.? I.e., what were we earning on capital, on average over the life of the product.

I took it to my higher-ups, hoping they would be pleased, and one said, “You don’t get it!? You don’t argue with Moses!? The commandment around here is a 15% return on average equity after-tax!? I don’t care about your new measure!? Does it give us a 15% return on average equity or not?!”

This person did not care for nuances, but I tried to explain the ROE pattern, and how this measure averaged it out.? It did not fly.? As many have commented, AIG was not a place that prized actuaries, particularly ones with principles.

As it was AIG found ways to keep its ROE high:

  • Exotic markets.
  • Be in every country.
  • Be in every market in the US.
  • Play sharp with reinsurers.
  • Increase leverage
  • Press the accounting hard, including finite reinsurance and other distortions of accounting.
  • Treat credit default swap premiums as “found money.”
  • Take on additional credit risk, like subprime lending inside the life companies through securities lending.

In the end, it was a mess, and destroyed what could have been a really good company.? Now, it won’t pay back the government in full, much less provide anything to its shareholders, common and preferred.

Even a company that is clever about acquisitions, like Assurant, where they do little tuck-in acquisitions and grow them organically, will eventually fall prey to the limits of their own growth.? That won’t happen for a while there, but for any company, it is something to watch.? Consistently high growth requires consistently increasing innovation, and that is really hard to do as the assets grow.

If True of Companies, More True of Governments

This is not only true of companies, but even nations.? After a long boom period, state and federal governments stopped treating growth in asset values as a birthright, granting them a seemingly unlimited stream of taxes from capital gains, property, and transfer taxes.? They took it a step further, borrowing in the present because they knew they would have more taxes later.? The states, most of which had to run a balanced budget, cheated in a different way — they didn’t lay aside enough cash for their pension and retiree healthcare promises.? The Federal government did both — borrowing and underfunding, because tomorrow will always be better than today.

Over a long enough period of time, things will be better in the future, absent plague, famine, rampant socialism, or war on your home soil.? But when a government makes long-dated promises, the future has to be better by a certain amount, and if not, there will be trouble. That’s why an economic downturn is so costly now, the dogs are behind the rabbit already, running backwards while the rabbit moves forwards makes it that much harder to catch up.

I’ve often said that observed economic relationships stop working when people start relying on them, or, start borrowing against them.? The system shifts in order to eliminate the “free lunch” that many thought was available.

A Final Note

Hedge funds and other aggressive investment vehicles should take note.? Just as it is impossible for corporations to compound their high profits for many decades, it is impossible to do the same as an investor.? Size catches up with you.? It’s a lot easier to manage a smaller amount — there are only so many opportunities and inefficiencies, and even fewer when you have to do so in size, like Mr. Buffett has to do.

“No tree grows to the sky.”? Wise words worth taking to heart.? Investment, Corporate, and Economic systems have limits in the intermediate-term.? Wise investors respect those limits, and look for growth in medium-sized and smaller institutions, not the growth heroes of the past, which are behemoths now.

As for governments, be skeptical of the ability of governments to “do it all,” being a savior for every problem.? Their resources are more limited than most would think. Also, look at the retreat in housing prices, because the retreat there is a display of what is happening? to tax revenues… the dearth will last as long.

Full disclosure: long AIZ

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (2)

Problems with Constant Compound Interest (2)

Posted on by David Merkel

I had many good comments on part 1 of this series.? One was particularly good that focused on the economy as a whole, and how the promises made by the government were unlikely to be fulfilled with Social Security and Medicare.? Our government attempts to finance programs on the cheap by relying on future growth, which does not always happen.? They move up spending rapidly if growth is large, and small if growth is negative.? In either case, the government grows as a fraction of the economy.

But let me consider asset allocation projections.? It is really difficult to consider average projections of asset returns, whether in real or nominal terms.? Asset returns vary considerably, and the number of years from which average returns are calculated are few relative to the volatility of returns.

We have created an industry of asset allocators, many of which have allocated off of foolish long-term historical assumptions, as if the past were prologue.? Even if they use stochastic models, the central tendency is critical.? What do they assume they can earn over long-dated investment grade debt?? The higher that margin is, the more they lead people astray.? Stocks win in the long run, but maybe by 1-2%, not 4-6%.

Consider defined benefit pension funds — after all, it is the same problem.? What is the right long term rate to assume for asset performance?? Alas there is no good answer, and with private DB plans continuing to terminate because of underfunding, the answer is less than clear.

Scoundrels use the mechanism of discounting to their own ends — they make future obligations seem smaller than they should be, magnifying profits, and minimizing capital needs.? Cash flows are inexorable, though.? There are few ways to avoid the promises from pensions.

Investors, be aware.? Realize that long term investment assumptions are probably liberal.? Also realize that long term assets and liabilities that rely on those assumptions have liberal valuations as well.? After all, who wants to under-report income when the accounting is squishy?

Now, for my readers, what have I missed?

Problems with Constant Compound Interest

Problems with Constant Compound Interest

Posted on by David Merkel

This piece is an experiment.? I’m not exactly sure how this will turn out by the time I am done, so if at the end you think I blew it, please break it to me gently.

People in general don’t get compound interest, or exponential processes generally.? It is not as if they are pessimistic, they are not numerate? enough to apply the rule of 72.? (Rule of 72: For interest rates between 3 and 24%, the time it takes to double the money is approximately 72 divided by the interest rate, expressed as a whole number.)

But there is a greater problem, and it applies to the bright as well as the dull.? People don’t understand the limitations of compound interest.

Let me begin with a story: I started my career at Pacific Standard Life, a little life insurer based in Davis, California.? The universal life policieswere crediting 11-12% interest, and annuities were in the 9-10% region.? It was fueled by junk bonds.? One of my first projects was to set the factors that would give us GAAP reserves for the universal life products.? To do this, I was told to project UL account values ahead at 11-12% interest for the life of the policies.

That rate of interest doubles policy account values every six or so years.? What economic environment would it imply to sustain such a rate of interest?

  • High inflation, or
  • High opportunities, because there is little competition.

The former was a possibility, the latter not.? As it was, inflation was receding, and 1986 was the nadir for the 80s.

People buying policies would see these tremendous returns illustrated, and would buy, because they saw an easy retirement in sight.? Alas, constant compound growth rarely happens in economics.? Policyholders ended up very disappointed; Pacific Standard went insolvent in 1989, and the rump was sold off to The Hartford.

Where do we often see constant compound growth modeled in finance?

  • Asset allocation models, including simple illustrations done by financial planners
  • Life insurance sales and accounting
  • Defined benefit pension accounting
  • Long-dated debt obligations
  • Simple stock price models, like the Gordon Model, and all of its dividend discount model cousins.
  • Social finance systems, like public pensions and healthcare.

There are likely many more.? Whenever we talk about long-dated financial obligations, whether assets or liabilities, we need something simple to aid us in decision-making, because the more variables that we toss in, the harder it is for us to make reasonable comparisons.? We need to reduce calculations to single variables of yield, present values, or future retirement incomes.? Our frail minds need simple answers to aid us.

I’m not being a pure critic here, because I need simple answers also.? Knowing the yield of a long debt obligation has some value, though if that yield is high, one should ask what the is likelihood of realizing the value of? the debt.? Similarly, it would be useful to know how likely it is that one would receive a certain income in retirement.

I’m going to hit the publish button now, and pick this up in a day or so.? Until then.

On Negative Interest Rates

On Negative Interest Rates

Posted on by David Merkel
Photo Credit: Alcino || What is the sound of negative one hand clapping?
Photo Credit: Alcino || What is the sound of negative one hand clapping?

As with many of my articles, this one starts with a personal story from my insurance business career (skip down four paragraphs to the end of the story if you want):

25 years ago, when it was still uncommon, I wanted?to go to an executive course at the Wharton School for actuaries that wanted to better understand investment math and markets. ?I went to my boss at AIG (a notably tight-fisted firm on expenses) and asked if the company would pay for me to go… it was an exclusive course, and very expensive compared to any other conference that I would ever go to again in my life. ?I tried not to get my hopes up.

Lo, and behold! ?AIG went for it!

A month later, I was with a bunch of bright actuaries at the Wharton School. ?The first thing I noticed was aside from the compound interest math, and maybe some bond knowledge, the actuaries were rather light on investment knowledge, and I would bet that all of them had passed the Society of Actuaries investment course. ?The second thing I noticed were some of the odd investments described in the syllabus: it was probably my first taste of derivative instruments. ?At the ripe old age of 29, I was learning a lot, and possibly more than the rest of my classmates, because I had spent a lot of time studying investments already, both on an academic and practical basis.

I had already studied the pricing of stock options in school, so I was familiar with Black-Scholes. ?(Trivia note: an actuary developed the same formula for valuing optionally terminable reinsurance treaties six years ahead of Black, Scholes and Merton. ?That doesn’t even take into account Bachelier, who derived it 73 years earlier, but no one knew about it, because it was written in French.) ?At this point, the professor left, and a grad student came in to teach us about the pricing of bond options. ?At the end of his lesson, it was time for the class to have a break. ?I went down to make a comment, and it went like this:

Me: You said that we have to adjust for the fact that interest rates can’t go negative.

Grad student: Of course.

Me: But interest rates could go negative.

GS: That’s ridiculous! ?Why would you ever lend money and accept back less than you gave them, and lose the time value of money?!

Me: Almost of the time, you wouldn’t. ?But imagine a scenario where the demand for loanable funds leaves interest rates near zero, but the times are insecure and violent, leaving you uncertain that if you stored your cash privately, you would run too large of a risk of having it stolen. ?You need your cash in the future for a given project. ?In this case, you would pay the bank to store your money.

GS: That’s an absurd scenario! ?That could never happen!

Me: It’s unlikely, I admit, but I wouldn’t say that you can never have negative interest rates.

GS: I will say it again: You can NEVER have negative interest rates.

Me: Thanks, I guess.

Well, so much for the distant past. ?Here is why I am writing this: yesterday, a friend of mine wrote me the following note:

Good evening.? I trust you had a blessed Lord’s Day in the new building.?

Talking bonds today with my Econ class.? Here’s our question. Other than playing a currency angle why would anyone buy European debt with a negative yield?? The Swiss and at least one other county sold 10 year notes with a negative yield.? Can you explain that?? No interest and less principle [sic] at the end.

Now, I didn’t quite get it perfectly right with the grad student at Wharton, but most of it comes down to:

  • Low demand for loanable funds,?with low measured inflation, and
  • Security and illiquidity of the funds invested

The first one everyone gets — inflation is low, and few want to borrow, so interest rates are very low. ?But that doesn’t explain how it can go negative.

Things are different for middle class individuals and large financial institutions. ?Someone in the middle class facing negative interest rates from a checking or savings account could say: “Forget it. ?I’m taking most of my money out of the bank, and storing it at home.” ?Leaving aside the inconvenience of currency transaction reports if the amount is over $10,000, and worries over theft, he could take his money home and store it. ?Note that he does have to run a risk of theft, though, so bringing the money home is not costless.

The bank has the same problem, but far larger. ?If you don’t invest the money, where would you store it? ?Could you even get enough currency delivered to do it? ?if you had a vault large enough to store it, could you trust the guards? ?Why make yourself a target? ?If you don’t have a vault large enough to store it, you’re in the same set of problems that exist for those that warehouse precious metals, but with a far more liquid commodity.

Thus in a weak economic environment like this, with low inflation, banks and other financial institutions that want certainty of payment in the future are willing to pay interest to get their money back later.

Part of the problem here is that the fiat currencies of the world exist only to be?units of account, and not stores of value. ?Thus in this unusual environment, they behave like any other commodity, where the prices for futures are often higher than the current spot price, which is known as backwardation. ?(Corrected from initial posting — i.e. it costs more to receive a given cash flow in the future than today, thus backwardation, not contango.) ?The rates can’t get too negative, though, or some institutions will bite the bullet and store as much cash as they can, just as other commodities get stored.

To use another analogy, a while ago, some market observers couldn’t get why anyone would accept a negative yield on Treasury Inflation Protected Securities [TIPS]. ?They did so because they had few other choices for transferring money to the future while still having inflation protection. ?Some people argued that they were locking in a loss. ?My comment at the time was, “They’re trying to avoid a larger loss.”

Thus the difficulty of managing cash outside of the bond/loan markets in a depressed economy leads to negative interest rates. ?The financial institutions may lose money in the process, but they are losing less money than if they tried to store and protect the money, if that could even be done.

Problems with Tax Reform

Problems with Tax Reform

Posted on by David Merkel

As I sit here, my taxes are done, all except for one K-1 that is very late, to put it mildly.? My taxes are complex, but my rule is that I do my own taxes.? If I can’t figure out the code, then I am probably doing something that I don’t understand the full economics behind it, and I should avoid it as a result.? Besides, it keeps me up with trends in the tax code that I might not truly grasp.? Surprises this year included the form for HSAs, and a credit? for promoting domestic production.? I also learned some of the intricacies in accounting for the sale of S corporation stock.? Not fun, but I learned something, and that is good.

It does motivate me to write a piece on tax reform, though.? I don’t fit neatly on the political spectrum: I’m a libertarian on economics, and a conservative on social policy (though conservative really isn’t the right word). Tax reform means different things to different people; let’s consider what it means to conservatives and liberals.

What does tax reform mean to conservatives?

  • Eliminate the estate tax
  • Eliminate the double taxation of dividends
  • Eliminate the marriage penalty (actually should be a goal of liberals, and not conservatives, but hey…)
  • Flatten the tax rate structure
  • Preferentially tax income classes that aid in capital formation
  • More taxation at the state level, less at the federal level
  • Carve out exceptions for political allies that support your broad agenda

What does tax reform mean to liberals?

  • Roll back the Bush tax cuts
  • Keep the estate tax
  • Increase the progressivity of tax rates
  • More taxation at the federal level, less at the state level
  • Preferentially tax wage income at lower rates
  • Carve out exceptions for political allies that support your broad agenda

To me, both of them miss a dimension of the problem.? The main problem is how we define income, not the rate at which we tax income.? Both liberals and conservatives support areas in the tax code that allow for deferral of taxation.? To me, that is a core problem in the tax code.? Taxation should be roughly proportionate to the good that a taxpayer is deriving from society.? As a proxy for that, it should be proportional to his increase in net worth, whether the increase in net worth is liquid or not.

I will use Warren Buffett as my example.? Because he rarely sells stock, his taxes are deferred both personally, and at Berkshire Hathaway.? His net worth keeps going up, and the Treasury doesn’t get a piece of it.? Then he has the nerve to show up on Capitol Hill in favor of the estate tax, a tax of which his estate will pay little, because he has given most of it away.

My view is that people should be taxed like traders, on the increase in their net worth, at the same rate, regardless of where the income comes from.? Taxes would be paid on a mark-to-market basis.? There would be no more tax deferral IRAs or 401(k)s, and even pension earnings would get taxed inside DB plans.? Life insurance and annuities would lose their tax breaks.? Even charitable endowments would be taxed.? Private equity would get taxed off of “phantom income” at a 15% compounded rate, i.e., a private equity fund with $100 million in equity would have to pay taxes on $15 million of phantom income, at the fund if 15% distributions are not made to shareholders.? Truing up would occur at the dissolution of the fund.

Another key component here would be that there would be no separate tax accounting basis — the IRS would use GAAP.? What you report, is what you get taxed on, with the exception that firms that are heavily indebted to avoid paying taxes would get taxed on phantom income, the same as private equity.? Also, all like-kind exchanges would be taxed.? Even real estate would follow the property assessor, and income taxation would occur on the increase.

Then eliminate all deductions, conservative and liberal ones, and you have a tax code that can operate at a low rate because the entire increase of wealth in the economy is being taxed, without exceptions.? Oh, and since the income has been taxed all of the way up, the estate tax is no longer needed.? It was needed when wealthy people could shelter their increasing net worth from taxation.

Objections to this Outlandish Proposal

  • Would you really allow investment losses to reduce someone’s income to zero, or below?? Yes, though there would have to be some safeguards against people who disguise their hobbies to be businesses.
  • This will kill investment; the economy won’t grow without tax deferral!? Nonsense.? Most tax deferral incentives don’t change the amount of investment, but just the forms that the investments go into.
  • Without tax deferral, people won’t buy life insurance, annuities, and corporations won’t provide pensions.? To some degree, yes, but after the shock wears off people will invest for maximum advantage again, and with an eye toward what is best, not what is tax-favored.? With my proposal, I don’t care if people have pensions or savings.? It’s all the same.? Life insurance and annuities will be bought for risk reduction reasons, not tax reasons.
  • This will kill private equity!? It won’t.? It may shrink it a little, but there are many advantage to private equity aside from deferral of taxation.
  • But phantom income will require illiquid investments to retain liquidity for taxes, or require equity holders to fund taxes.? Guilty as? charged.? It changes the business model to that degree.
  • This discriminates against the poor in favor of the rich.? No, it discriminates against the clever rich, who shield the increase in their net worth from taxation.? Taxes delayed often become taxes avoided in entire.? Poor people should pay some taxes.? They benefit from society a little, and taxes would give them greater interest in voting.
  • If there’s no deduction/credit for JKL, then JKL will disappear.? Good, or, maybe I should say, yes, there will be a decrease, but if it is valuable, it will find its own level.
  • This proposal is incomplete!? You haven’t considered a lot of other areas.? No doubt; there would be a lot to do here, should it ever see the light of day.? Let John McCain be a real straight-talking maverick, and adopt a proposal like this.? He could be a real conservative, while offending all of the “conservatives.”

I harbor no illusions here.? We have the tax code that we deserve.? Don’t blame the IRS.? Don’t blame the President or Congress.? Blame those who elected them, and those who failed to vote.? The politicians offer us favors from our own money, and we thank them for it, by re-electing them.? I know that my views of tax reform will never be enacted because it steps on too many feet.? Can you imagine how many accountants, attorneys and actuaries would be unemployed by this?? If they fought hard against TRA ’86, just imagine how they would fight against this.? The politicians like fostering the illusion that they create our prosperity, when in reality, they take a share of it.? A proposal like this, that makes taxation more immediate, and more transparent, would make people more concerned about where their taxes go, because they would feel it more acutely.

And then, after all of this, we should move election day to April 15th.? Let the voters feel acutely what the politicians have decided for raising revenue, and they will render a better verdict.

Sorted Weekly Tweets

Posted on by David Merkel

Picture Credit: David Merkel, with an assist from the YouImagine AI image generator || Twitter bird visits China

Banking

  • Saba Capital’s Boaz Weinstein talks bank CDS; Carvana exchange falters; Evergrande reveals restructuring plan https://t.co/SFUXCBASiZ  Thinks bank sub debt is overpriced in general… Mar 24, 2023
  • US authorities guarantee bank deposits as high as $250,000. That could soon change https://t.co/PHS0cpK0R0  Will solve some short-term problems, and create bigger long-term problems. Mar 24, 2023
  • The banking precedent that matters for where we are now isn’t 2008, but the empire-building a decade earlier https://t.co/wgPsiKSHFC  As I have said before, hand banking regulation back to the states. End interstate banking. I like JP Morgan so much, I want 50 of them Mar 24, 2023
  • Schwab CEO Walt Bettinger says the brokerage giant could continue to operate even if it lost most of its deposits over the next year https://t.co/kZog3PhNBs  “At the end of last year, it was the 10th-largest bank in the US” $SCHW Okay, here is a sizable problem. Negative TBV MTM Mar 23, 2023
  • The Federal Home Loan Bank System issued $304 billion in debt last week. That’s almost double the $165 billion that liquidity-hungry lenders tapped from the Fed https://t.co/LVsV7GAmWD  The FHLBs are the second to last resort lender; there must be demand for funds Mar 21, 2023
  • Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen will tell bankers that the US could intervene again to protect depositors if smaller lenders get into jeopardy https://t.co/U5OUtxgg9p  You can’t have it both ways. Insuring all deposits will lead to bankers taking more risk Mar 21, 2023
  • Silicon Valley Bank was warned by BlackRock that risk controls were weak https://t.co/g544mW9MUa  This article a prime example of what I mean when interest rate risk does not get measured well for banks. 1-2% parallel shift rate rises are not enough! Mar 21, 2023
  • JPMorgan Chase Chief Executive Jamie Dimon is leading discussions with the chief executives of other big banks about fresh efforts to stabilize troubled First Republic Bank https://t.co/IJgU7riYOm  Uninsured deposits have to live somewhere… Mar 20, 2023
  • Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Fed Chair Jerome Powell are seeking to reassure investors to halt a slide in financial stocks https://t.co/fAJXDXvTzX  Will it be able to keep uninsured depositors? If so, will they be able to earn money over the cost of their liabilities? $FRC Mar 20, 2023
  • A coalition of midsize US banks asked regulators to extend FDIC insurance to all deposits for the next two years https://t.co/HMueRWZjHk  You could quietly raise the rate you pay on deposits, but don’t seem panicked Mar 20, 2023

Odds & Ends

  • Crypto fugitive Do Kwon, creator of the failed TerraUSD stablecoin, has been arrested in Montenegro https://t.co/oWPI8PUoIt  Lose enough people enough money, and it is likely you will be caught and prosecuted. Mar 24, 2023
  • Excel Never Dies, by @packyM https://t.co/OFjdeIFwV5  It’s the Swiss Army Knife of software. Used carefully, it can do amazing things. Mar 24, 2023
  • Researchers did DNA testing on strands of Ludwig van Beethoven’s hair and found answers to questions about the composer’s health and family history https://t.co/lqEv106yVV  A temperamental genius who was a wreck as a man. Still, there are a lot of unproven aspects to DNA testing. Mar 22, 2023
  • Elon Musk’s global empire has made him extremely powerful — and a major headache for Washington https://t.co/Mj5kZM70X4  How Elon Musk gives many politicians distress in the US Government, while having fun at the same time Mar 21, 2023
  • Here’s a visual guide to how America uses freight trains https://t.co/3g2iB4jfmv  Interesting graphics. Seems that safety improvements reversed around 2010. Mar 21, 2023
  • JPMorgan owned the London Metal Exchange nickel contracts that turned out to be backed by bags of stones rather than metal https://t.co/EewStihuef  Hmm… this *did* lead LME to ask the warehouses to check all the nickel inventories. Mar 21, 2023
  • Forget simple shampoo and conditioner. More consumers are adding extra steps to their showers–enough for the process to last 60 minutes or more. https://t.co/VHfulhcl9v  I realize I am an old guy, but this seems overboard. Mar 21, 2023
  • Why have a drab lawn when you can paint it green? Grass-painting is a growing way to save money and water. Neighbors might be shocked. “One day it’ll be yellow and the next day it’s green.” https://t.co/Chz6qpqH70  I would rather live with my weedy yard, with its many problems. Mar 20, 2023
  • The problem with AirPods and other Bluetooth earbuds? Their tiny, irreplaceable batteries https://t.co/81Wo8v1dOz  You could buy wireless headphones. They are better for your ears as well. Mar 20, 2023

Commercial Real Estate

  • As funding markets seize up, malls are headed for one more shakeout and that may be just what the long-suffering sector needs https://t.co/L9Bsj38U8P  Class A retail should be okay, though there will still be stress Mar 24, 2023
  • Small bank struggles could hit the real estate market hard https://t.co/1JujTvSqwZ  16% of CRE is offices Mar 24, 2023
  • Smaller banks are likely to respond to the crisis of confidence in banks overall by tightening standards and slowing lending to raise capital ratios https://t.co/j7gTP9Kr9L  Especially commercial real estate lending Mar 24, 2023
  • Remote work is starting to hit office rents https://t.co/MDGnDAedFl  Effect is higher where commuting is hard Mar 24, 2023
  • A large number of office defaults could force banks to mark down value of these and other loans https://t.co/bxyTAzZTee  Most of the carnage should be confined to offices, and malls that are not Class A Mar 22, 2023
  • Transcript: Where Stress Is Brewing in the $20 Trillion Commercial Real Estate Market https://t.co/pbWdLkcuZw  @TheStalwart & @tracyalloway did a great interview w/Rich Hill of Cohen & Steers. Offices are in trouble, Malls less so. And, it’s still about location. Mar 20, 2023

Science

  • The Sun Is Stranger Than Astrophysicists Imagined https://t.co/joHsDfna1D  Far more gamma rays than expected, and a big block of spectrum missing. Mar 24, 2023
  • A space object baffled scientists as it zipped through our solar system in 2017. Theories ranged from an asteroid to an alien probe, but a new study offers another idea. https://t.co/HG0lsIqwWb  It’s only a comet Mar 22, 2023
  • Google opens early access to its ChatGPT rival Bard — here are our first impressions https://t.co/zIVLnaXPL5  Bard is coming soon to a screen near you. You can sign up for the waitlist. Mar 22, 2023
  • Space junk getting you down? Just get out of the way https://t.co/8aNEFoA80b  Send up less, decommission more (burn up on re-entry), and dodge junk is the least costly solution Mar 23, 2023
  • A test vehicle unveiled by Chinese carmaker JAC has the battery world buzzing about sodium-ion cells https://t.co/OLMA08ggtH  Has the potential to deliver power at half the cost of lithium ion batteries. Plus: no fire risk. Minus: added weight Mar 21, 2023
  • Here’s everything you need to know about deadly fungus Candida auris, which has spread to more than half of all US states https://t.co/WMS0ixGumM  This one is challenging, as it is resistant to present antifungals & has a death rate of 30-60%. Mar 21, 2023

Culture

  • TikTok’s content moderator backtracks on a promise to stop making employees review the web’s most extreme content https://t.co/e7mAmHs2PN  It would be a rare person who could deal with every type of disturbing content day after day, and stay sane. Mar 25, 2023
  • Lawsuits and legislation targeting sex trafficking are causing collateral damage: they are damaging the livelihoods of online sex workers https://t.co/2fxX1lmIES  Suing Visa $V did the trick. Do we really want payment networks to be ethics guardians? That’s the government’s job Mar 24, 2023
  • The Real Reason South Koreans Aren’t Having Babies https://t.co/vXCgz96mQR  Evangelicals are 20% of SK’s population. This article doesn’t go into this, but the #1 factor differentiating fertility is strong religious faith. Likely true in SK. Mar 23, 2023
  • Is it a bad idea to assign a sex to digital assistants and other robots? https://t.co/dBwInqoxnJ  No, in most fiction, robots are assigned a sex, as they mimic humans. Example: Yokohama Kaidashi Kikou, where almost all the robots are female https://t.co/Hfl0JuTgMZ  Mar 23, 2023
  • What happens when sexting chatbots dump their human lovers https://t.co/o6N012otk5  This reads like something Asimov wrote (not just “I, Robot) in some of his stories in the 1970s. Mar 22, 2023

Monetary Policy

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Raphael Bostic says the decision to raise interest rates by 25 basis points this week came after “a lot of debate” https://t.co/KpzSjt2iXo  Smart short-term moves that lead to bad long-term results. Mar 25, 2023
  • The crisis that claimed Credit Suisse and SVB heralds a new chapter for financial capitalism https://t.co/S7ZkUfxSXt  The errors of monetary policy compound, creating a debt-ridden unstable economy. The government will take it over. Then the system as a whole will fail. Mar 25, 2023
  • The Fed’s Self-Directed Tragedy https://t.co/rPjnfyvKxi  If the FOMC would avoid inverting the yield curve or making it ultra-steep, we could avoid lot of problems. Toss all the neoclassical economists out of the Fed. Mar 22, 2023
  • STEVE HANKE And MATT SEKERKE: Fed’s Monetary Blunders Put The Entire Banking System In A Bad Spot https://t.co/CShCuEQaOS  This is the cost of QE. Load the banking system w/long debt, & the costs come due when policy tightens Mar 22, 2023
  • The Fed Must Not Flinch https://t.co/cQW7Ynwol5  Total idiot. Inflation is less important than systemic stability. Mar 22, 2023

Companies

  • Apple plans to spend $1 billion a year to make films for theaters https://t.co/sWbCMqCyo6  There is too much money chasing entertainment. Crowded trade. $AAPL $NFLX $AMZN Mar 24, 2023
  • Diebold Nixdorf and some of its lenders remain in confidential talks as the automated teller machines maker works to head off a liquidity shortfall https://t.co/vDO4aqd2qQ  This stock took a while to die $DBD People don’t use cash much Mar 21, 2023
  • The world’s most indebted developer said it expects that a restructuring support agreement will be ready by the end of March, after it won preliminary support from a group of major creditors https://t.co/r1ZjnnvxTF  Playing for time, one last time. Mar 21, 2023
  • Joe Hinrichs had never worked for a railroad when he was named CEO of $CSX, but the company is counting on his outsider perspective https://t.co/yXWnPKybDU  Key question: how much incremental profit will come from treating workers better? Mar 21, 2023
  • Some job listings don’t give anyone a ghost of a chance. Why some companies are posting ads for positions they aren’t actually trying to fill https://t.co/jgSDzj3wHb  The labor market is not as strong as it seems Mar 20, 2023

Risk Management

  • The M-Score is warning that the chance of fraud at major companies is the highest in over 40 years, writes Numbers columnist @JoshZumbrun https://t.co/ijbzyL9VMA  Take note, financial flexibility is ebbing. Mar 24, 2023
  • It’s the Most Thankless Job in Banking. Silicon Valley Bank Didn’t Fill It for Months. https://t.co/ZeoxnnEFww  If the CEO, CFO, & Chairman do not fully buy in to limit risk, rather than optimize risk, it does no good to have a Chief Risk Officer. Mar 23, 2023
  • Most companies don’t take steps to keep their bank accounts safe. Here’s why and how they should. https://t.co/R1cpJR3Y23  These are clever ideas, but why not just keep a laddered account of T-bills for the cash above normal transactional needs? Mar 23, 2023
  • The collapse of two lenders has prompted a rethink of banking rules, but risk experts say the failures could be something else: risk overseers who can’t stand up to the bosses https://t.co/gbbY2x0vsj  Boards exist to excuse management. Interest rate risk management at banks stinks Mar 22, 2023
  • The Federal Reserve raised concerns about risk management at Silicon Valley Bank starting at least four years before its failure earlier this month https://t.co/El3a1mjYV9  Since no one will talk about it, we have no idea of what this was. Mar 20, 2023

Market Dynamics

  • Hedge funds that bet on big-picture market moves have been hit with steep losses as a spate of recent bank failures upends bets that interest rates would remain elevated https://t.co/5NH5HT7hqg  Macro hedge funds are not infallible. Same for CTAs. Mar 23, 2023
  • Steve Leuthold, a financial guru known for partying and potatoes, has died at age 85. https://t.co/wANYmLz0RC  For a few years, I enjoyed reading his research. I knew he was a character — I didn’t know he was *such* a character. Mar 22, 2023
  • Banks and investors are reviving a push for changes to securities accounting after the SVB collapse https://t.co/YVRuZGWbvX  As I said to IASB 20+ years ago, there should be book and fair value balance sheets and income statements. More info for stakeholders. Mar 22, 2023
  • Why your financial conditions index sucks https://t.co/lJn1Rh2Zgf  I like the yield on 2-year US Treasury minus the yield on 30-Day A2/P2 Nonfinancial Commercial Paper https://t.co/KWJ42jOwnE  Mar 21, 2023
  • Record debt levels around the world have spurred fears of a ‘Minsky moment.’ Here’s what that means https://t.co/ljaM2Dmtms  So long as keep increasing debt levels, we will always face instability due to misfinancing of assets Mar 21, 2023

Around the US

  • CNN Visits San Francisco https://t.co/ifaUGKWgoG  CNN reporters with added security get robbed in San Francisco. Progressivism at its finest. Mar 22, 2023
  • Should New York be able to force suburbs to approve housing? Gov. Kathy Hochul’s plan to do so faces pushback https://t.co/NWahNVpLyQ  Zoning imposes costs on poor people Mar 20, 2023
  • As NBA fans wring their hands over star players missing games, the league’s coaches, owners and commissioner agree on one thing: it seems to work. https://t.co/715oUeUpWS  You have to remember — it’s a business. Disappointing fans when you are on the road is bearable. Mar 20, 2023
  • California’s torrential rains have plunged tens of thousands of homes into darkness, but may end up keeping the lights on during its summer blackout season https://t.co/ZSMf0aGSqk  You wanted more rain & you got it. Why complain? Mar 20, 2023
  • Chicago’s mayoral frontrunner Paul Vallas is taking a leaf out of Rahm Emanuel’s book to try to lure businesses back https://t.co/fxVWL6jQjY  Consider the economic drag of Chicago and Illinois state pensions & the task is very hard. What budget area will you cut? Mar 20, 2023

Islamic World

  • Iranian activists want tech companies to ban the Ayatollah https://t.co/0P00BQ7T5y  Tough to do, even though leader in Iran can use Twitter, but its citizens can’t Mar 22, 2023
  • About 79% of Turkish citizens think home sales to foreign nationals should be banned, according to a survey https://t.co/GrI5YPKp60  But well-off Russians, Iranians & Iraqis need a place to flee to. Mar 21, 2023
  • Iran is the big winner in the agreement with Saudi Arabia. Having given Tehran the upper hand, Riyadh should expect to be slapped around. https://t.co/MDqXXGRFwo  Hard to say. The disagreements of over 1300 years are not easily overcome Mar 21, 2023
  • The Taliban’s supreme leader, who banned girls from attending secondary school a year ago, is discovering it is one thing to issue a fiat, and quite another to enforce it. https://t.co/P7uzKoYPZR  Similar to those who homeschool underground in many totalitarian nations Mar 21, 2023

China

  • Those fretting about the challenge a united China and Russia pose to the West should have another look at the history of their relationship https://t.co/dMm4qPn105  Article indirectly compares Russia to N. Korea. China supports both, but has little leverage over either. Mar 25, 2023
  • Xi Jinping used two days of talks in Moscow to firmly align with Russia against the US. But the Chinese leader held back from offering Vladimir Putin something he’s been looking for: A commitment to buy a lot more gas https://t.co/2oXmXmS1dT  A lot of gas Mar 23, 2023
  • Chinese lenders and small businesses are stuck in a doom loop https://t.co/5jujZE5Iyt  You can’t have strong small & medium sized firms without freedom Mar 22, 2023

Credit Suisse

  • Credit Suisse’s top shareholders and AT1 bondholders are among the big losers while $UBS is a winner https://t.co/lCx0y3KOY6  Well said… other winners include employees of CS that will have jobs, & liability-holders of CS that will get paid. Mar 21, 2023
  • Credit Suisse’s riskiest bonds will be wiped out as part of its deal with UBS Group, dealing a blow to investors who held the lender’s AT1 bonds https://t.co/ZVp64UFRcz  When buying innovative bonds, be sure to read the terms in the prospectus. I like my bonds simple. Mar 20, 2023
  • After the write-down of Credit Suisse’s riskiest bonds, the Bank of England sought to clarify its rules regarding the order in which shareholders and creditors should bear losses in the event of insolvency https://t.co/g7uHWvbrhP  Read the terms of the bonds. Hard to cancel common Mar 20, 2023

CFA Institute

  • The AV CFA Meme Competition: the winners https://t.co/nHMeURHkZp  I had never seen these. Pretty funny. Easy exams that keep getting easier. Mar 20, 2023
  • Good news: ChatGPT would probably fail a CFA exam https://t.co/P5GMfOArRT  Scored at the same level as random guessing. Mar 20, 2023

Sorted Weekly Tweets

Posted on by David Merkel

Picture Credit: David Merkel, with an assist from the YouImagine AI image generator || Twitter bird happily surfs

Real Estate

  • NYC’s biggest-ever office-to-housing conversion is opening in the Financial District at prices ranging from just over $1 million for a studio to $12.75 million for a four-bedroom spread https://t.co/sXCwHGAgC3  Nice, if you can afford it. Feb 24, 2023
  • Home lenders are looking for ways to make 6% mortgages more appealing https://t.co/fOq3ulMZm0  Don’t do a buydown of the first-year interest rate. If you can’t afford the house on a level rate basis, don’t buy the house. What will you do when the rate rises? Feb 24, 2023
  • That 3% Mortgage Just Keeps Getting Better https://t.co/mFcum8UPo1  Rather than prepay, invest prepayment money in higher-yielding safe bonds. If rates fall such it doesn’t work anymore, take the appreciated bonds and do a big prepayment Feb 24, 2023
  • The US housing market lost the most value since 2008 https://t.co/qJYXFrPWp7  Has the FOMC forgotten the lessons of the Great Financial Crisis? Yes! Same errors that Bernanke committed… same certainty Feb 23, 2023
  • A growing number of big office landlords are defaulting on their loans, reflecting high interest rates and the popularity of remote and hybrid work policies https://t.co/5LJIGtxPrn  Slow motion train wreck Feb 22, 2023
  • Some people buying their first home will see their fees cut by about $800 a year under a new program that aims to address soaring borrowing costs https://t.co/ABVJpJfqj1  Make FHA loans more attractive by reducing the rate charged on mortgage insurance by 0.3% Feb 22, 2023
  • A couple near Chicago sees investing in real estate as a way to boost their wealth. A financial pro offers advice https://t.co/lVFWXKktkX  No. Real estate is a business. Consider the value of your time, as you say you want to start a family. Buy shares in equity REITs instead. Feb 22, 2023
  • Pyramid’s Crossgates Mall loans lurch toward default https://t.co/Xx2tiOqSR6  “Like most large malls across the U.S., the Crossgates business model has been crushed by the pandemic and changing shopping trends” Feb 21, 2023
  • A growing number of big office landlords are defaulting on their loans, reflecting high interest rates and the popularity of remote and hybrid work policies https://t.co/5LJIGtxPrn  Office properties & lower quality retail will show increasing defaults Feb 21, 2023
  • Europe’s property sector is springing cash calls and dividend cuts on shareholders. But investors in the financially stronger firms aren’t all smiles @hughes_chris https://t.co/nxWXx4cVWw  Effect is highest in Sweden, lowest in the UK Feb 21, 2023
  • A California-based real-estate agent was arranging a deposit when she realized she was getting scammed. “My guy was ready to wire $70,000 to this escrow. Thank God he didn’t.” https://t.co/IRvY6Ap0fW  Bizarre real estate stories where crime was a factor. Feb 20, 2023

Odds & Ends

  • Starbucks launches a range of olive oil-infused drinks in Italy to boost market share in a country where it’s struggled to gain a foothold https://t.co/qsDrYX3fHr  That will work? Feb 23, 2023
  • Is tort reform in the Sunshine State even possible? https://t.co/xyLdMxeue8  Unlikely. By the state gov’t being too interventionist in market issues and yet allowing for too many tort claims to go to trial, the P&C insurance markets are broken in Florida Feb 23, 2023
  • @michaelxpettis I said something like this yesterday, but not as well. Thanks. Feb 23, 2023
  • The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating whether investor-protection laws were violated as stablecoins were issued https://t.co/PAF7eJnwfF  They are akin to deposit accounts in banking, and should be regulated that way. This one doesn’t belong to the SEC. Feb 23, 2023
  • Social Security Myths That Won’t Die https://t.co/BFGmcGq9GE  Mostly correct, though there are some nuances that he misses. Worth a read. Feb 22, 2023
  • The pandemic wiped out decades of gains by US students. Many parents are in the dark about how far their own kids must go to recover https://t.co/MKkoW2YSuK  One big error of the COVID era was not requiring an additional year of school for students, to make up for what they missed Feb 22, 2023
  • Major brokerages and news media feature technical analysis https://t.co/D6REmikOvx  Pictures grab people, because they like patterns, whether intellectually defensible or not. Feb 21, 2023
  • My tweet “Clouds moving rapidly west, with strong surface winds out of the south” s/b “Clouds moving rapidly east, with strong surface winds out of the south” But what a day, now it is “Clouds moving rapidly east, with strong surface winds out of the north” Feb 21, 2023
  • The Perfect Retirement Investment Nobody Wants https://t.co/27PPPYbt3k  Life insurers have gotten badly burned on LTC. Many annuity companies don’t want to offer LTC. Agents don’t like Immediate Annuities because they never get another commission from the policyholder Feb 21, 2023
  • Asda is rationing sales of fruit and vegetables after widespread shortages. Here’s what UK shoppers need to know https://t.co/x7ITKaOtuU  Effects of a bad growing season in N. Africa Feb 21, 2023
  • Plains, Ga., has about 550 residents—including Jimmy Carter, who is receiving home hospice care. “When I heard the news my heart hurt to know that he was going through this.” https://t.co/3Q5eSEDV6s  Liberal Baptist became a most improbable President of the US Feb 20, 2023

Non-US

  • Soaring onion prices are forcing governments to protect supplies https://t.co/QpkUL7EyZN  If you want to see riots, have poor people unable to afford moderately good food. Feb 25, 2023
  • New Zealand’s recent cyclone shows “the importance of physical cash still in society today,” RBNZ Assistant Governor Karen Silk says https://t.co/lxfSOZh3Th  You can’t have a society without physical currency Feb 25, 2023
  • How India is shaking off its shackles and emerging as an economic power https://t.co/E7WETLSov6  This is wishful thinking. Cultures change slowly, and the Indian government is still pretty corrupt. Feb 23, 2023
  • Iraq is planning to pay for private-sector imports from China in yuan, injecting foreign currency into the financial system to help ease pressure on the dinar https://t.co/IIQsGpJNbI  Will do little for the Iraq economy Feb 22, 2023
  • Iran introduces fresh restrictions on foreign currency sales after a rush on euros and dollars weakened the rial to an all-time low of 500,000 against the greenback https://t.co/BCAg4mi3Om  Corruption, bad policy and sanctions create this hyperflation Feb 21, 2023
  • Kazakhstan says local brokerages that snapped up Russian sovereign debt last year did so largely on behalf of clients who were Kazakh and Russian residents https://t.co/he4RkZaErR  Own Russian sovereign debt? There is liquidity in Kazakhstan. Feb 21, 2023
  • Russian exports of discounted crude and fuel oil to China jumped to record levels as the re-opening of the world’s biggest energy importer gathers pace https://t.co/j6iiSMmeFT  The discounts to Brent for Urals ($13) and Espo ($8) Crude are smaller than what I have read in the past Feb 21, 2023
  • Terrorists were blamed when explosives were found in an SUV parked outside the home of Mumbai’s richest man. The truth was far more alarming. https://t.co/ckyNmd6as8  Long article on entrenched police/political corruption. Another reason India will not develop Feb 21, 2023
  • Japan promises radical spending to boost its birthrate. Will it work? https://t.co/judPpbjI0z  It probably won’t, but perhaps governments could reduce old-age social insurance payments to those who don’t raise children, making the systems solvent #thepunishmentfitsthecrime Feb 20, 2023

Portfolio Management

  • Wagering on the bounce in stocks was always a long shot. Now it’s looking like a sucker’s bet https://t.co/Uy9U89wJBF  The problem is greater for growth stocks Feb 25, 2023
  • “There’s a risk that the macro economy delivers results that markets are still woefully unprepared for,” Billionaire quant investor Cliff Asness warned https://t.co/1yPXSxPr4f  “the valuation gap between the priciest and cheapest stocks is still at the 94th percentile” #agree Feb 23, 2023
  • The fixed-income market has become too bearish, too quickly https://t.co/4CyBDZevFM  Hard to say. There seems to be more demand to borrow on the long end of late. They may be wrong, but the long end of the bond market is rarely irrational. Feb 22, 2023
  • Rajiv Jain is the opposite of Ark CEO Cathie Wood. He’s quietly built a stock-picking juggernaut by investing in old-school, out-of-favor companies https://t.co/JEYvyUM7WD  Difficult to get so many decisions right consistently. Feb 22, 2023
  • The DJIA’s shake-up in the summer of 2020 dumped Exxon Mobil, Pfizer and Raytheon just as it was their turn to thrive https://t.co/QAnLl0umqv  The short-run effect of index inclusion/deletion is up/down, but the 2020 DJIA changes had the opposite performance over the next 2.6 yrs Feb 21, 2023
  • Rising interest rates boosted corporate pensions last year. This year rising rates may boost costs. https://t.co/YctKh06Uxi  It doesn’t have to work this way. You can invest to immunize your pension costs against changes in interest rates. It’s not rocket science. Feb 20, 2023
  • Biden’s SEC is coming for your investment account https://t.co/kTUj8hg9nQ  Actually, Gensler’s proposal would level the playing field, and create a fairer market structure for smaller investors. Why we have such a fragmented market system today astounds me. Feb 18, 2023

Economics

  • “It’s everywhere.” A bird flu outbreak has led to the death of nearly 60 million farm-raised chickens, turkeys and ducks in the U.S. Farmers fear the virus is here to stay. https://t.co/3v2NvG5N5u  A greater proportion of laying hens have died vs chickens generally in the US. Feb 23, 2023
  • Which explains why egg prices have risen so much more than chicken meat prices… https://t.co/eEyGIkUTVG  Feb 23, 2023
  • The world’s largest trial of the four-day work week finds a majority of companies are making the shift https://t.co/hnAky9goEQ  Color me dubious Feb 21, 2023
  • The rise of kitchen table economics https://t.co/Bo6nBxqnZB  Yes, contracts are too complex and construe everything in favor of the large corporations, but you don’t have to sign them unless you are getting enough value. Feb 21, 2023
  • Letter: The economic conditions that make wars more likely https://t.co/NfubUHNC8R  “A plan is needed to regulate current account imbalances, which draws on John Maynard Keynes’s project for an international clearing union.” You really want near-fixed exchange rates? Feb 21, 2023
  • Presidents are tweeting about it, and it’s featuring in election campaigns: Here’s how the world fertilizer crisis became political https://t.co/in7c4UVLgO  This is over shortages of potash & phosphate. Also trade issues stemming from a few wars and their related sanctions Feb 21, 2023

US Politics

  • Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker said he’s willing to spend what it takes to keep Ron DeSantis & Donald Trump out of the White House https://t.co/V8cFk679HD  “Taking your eye off the ball.” I’ve done that. Neglects core responsibilities as governor to criticize national politicians Feb 25, 2023
  • White House is considering two economists who in the Obama administration—Karen Dynan and Janice Eberly—as candidates to become the Federal Reserve’s vice chair https://t.co/IbgMLjjkiP  Please, not an economist. No academics. No former Fed or government lackeys. Feb 23, 2023
  • The Defense Department and Microsoft are investigating an error that exposed military emails, highlighting the security risk of moving sensitive Pentagon data to the cloud https://t.co/w2YPXK9VCM  Happens to the best of us, and the government as well. Feb 23, 2023
  • Biden’s Social Security Trap by @wjmcgurn https://t.co/o2c5ZSJQrV  There is no political will to solve OASDHI (Social Security). Thus in 2032, we will face a scenario like this: https://t.co/BXY54hjsoB  https://t.co/8YWKsnmZvX  Feb 21, 2023
  • The PCAOB says it doesn’t have jurisdiction to monitor audits of privately held crypto firms. Some say there are ways to strengthen the board’s crypto oversight https://t.co/GUoKyWjYY6  Until you can say it is a deposit, commodity, or security, you don’t know how to regulate/audit Feb 21, 2023

Technology

  • Germ-zapping lasers can help cut down on infections after surgery https://t.co/979qq9KSSu  Sounds promising. Feb 25, 2023
  • How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language https://t.co/YvAvVy4H0K  Long read, but fascinating. Memory flaws are one of the biggest reasons for software crashes, and Rust eliminates that problem. Feb 24, 2023
  • Apple is making major progress on a no-prick blood glucose monitoring system for its smartwatch https://t.co/fzN4nDBa1Q  Big stuff, if it works, which has been elusive so far Feb 23, 2023
  • Ozempic’s popularity among people looking to lose weight has limited supplies for diabetes patients who depend on the drug to control their blood sugar https://t.co/2cFHjgLzjK  What is nice for those who want to lose weight is necessary for diabetics Feb 22, 2023
  • Removing carbon from the air will be a key step in fighting climate change. But it’s plagued by problems https://t.co/IhFxHwvqYV  Interesting, if it genuinely does what they say it does Feb 20, 2023

China

  • Xi Jinping is set to have more control in decisions over the financial system, with the likely revival of a powerful committee and a possible appointment of a key ally in the central bank https://t.co/eu2p8z2dpx  What good or bad comes from this is a mystery – ill-minded tinkering Feb 25, 2023
  • Empty shipping containers pile up at packed Chinese port as orders dwindle https://t.co/3f8GPQ1By3  So much for the Chinese economic recovery Feb 21, 2023
  • Thousands of Chinese Retirees Protest Government Cuts to Benefits https://t.co/8JmxGfyENx  Social Insurance plans fail when the ratio of workers to beneficiaries gets too low. Feb 21, 2023
  • Any gains China might have anticipated from its embrace of Russia are hard to spot. But the costs are clear & growing https://t.co/F8wNl8ruWU  “Xi is trapped in a strategic dilemma, at the mercy of events. His erstwhile masterstroke is looking more and more like a losing bet.” Feb 21, 2023
  • Pakistan’s creditors are demanding China take as big a haircut as them in any sovereign debt restructuring, perhaps bigger. It should @mihirssharma https://t.co/2wnXDsT4nW  If corruption is not ended, debt forgiveness won’t do much Feb 20, 2023

Companies

  • Carvana’s disappointing quarterly results sent the online used-car dealer’s stock into freefall and triggered a string of warnings from analysts https://t.co/Pe6xrZjMBT  So much for showmanship $CVNA Feb 25, 2023
  • BYD Most Likely Faked Its 2022 Sales Numbers, Real Ones Could Be Much Lower https://t.co/hpjoersddF  I have no idea, but if true, wow. Feb 24, 2023
  • National Public Radio will reduce its staff by 10% after projecting a $30 million revenue shortfall for the coming year https://t.co/shgKfke3Xb  In the end, it is just a business, albeit a nonprofit. Good nonprofits care for their people and don’t overexpand during booms https://t.co/Tlzm6Habx1  Feb 23, 2023
  • The EV question for auto executives is: How quickly should they make the shift to electric vehicles? https://t.co/8MaVClqMLB  The danger is in moving too fast on this. Let unsubsidized consumers decide. Feb 22, 2023
  • Almost a decade ago, Elon Musk envisioned a passenger transit that moved at nearly the speed of sound. Where is it? https://t.co/rhGkIWdDSn  Hyperloop: Boring fantasy, not technology Feb 21, 2023

South Africa

  • Eskom’s chairman says outgoing CEO behaved “reprehensibly” when he made accusations of theft and corruption within the state-owned electricity company https://t.co/dupwUx6T1U  Telling the truth is “reprehensible.” Coal thieves also a problem. Get ready for more blackouts. Feb 23, 2023
  • South Africa’s rand rallies after the budget unveiled details of plans to deal with debt at the ailing state-run power utility Eskom https://t.co/TX3kvaN8PN  Unless you deal with corruption and crime surrounding Eskom, this is all for naught Feb 22, 2023
  • South Africa’s finance minister will probably spend about five minutes of his budget speech Wednesday on Eskom — a tense 300 seconds for bondholders https://t.co/SBswUTR3G4  If you can’t end the corruption & sabotage regarding Eskom, the debt transfer won’t help South Africa Feb 21, 2023

Ukraine War

  • As NATO’s military commander a decade ago, Admiral @StavridisJ worked productively with Russian generals. But Putin’s obstinance led to his doomed war in Ukraine https://t.co/73lA9K8J0B  The Russian military exists to make the French military look good Feb 23, 2023
  • As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine enters year two & relations with China worsen, concerns persist over whether the US is ready to fight a war https://t.co/w2JbHsZNi0  “Every single person knows that what we’re doing is crazy,” said Ferrari. “But everybody is helpless to change it.” Feb 21, 2023
  • Vladimir Putin should read the story of King Croesus. In fact, so should we all https://t.co/abmJ06n3qu  Almost no expected the current outcome. That said, many wars end in a stalemate. That seems to be what is happening now. Feb 20, 2023

Personal Finance

  • Why don’t we talk about money? https://t.co/uYnJdKGDFs  Other reasons: looking bad by comparison, people may think you are arrogant because you have done well. I think children need to understand how the economics of the family works, so they can do it as well or better Feb 22, 2023
  • Some parents aren’t waiting for retirement or urgent healthcare needs to move in with adult children https://t.co/EeBAGjFVHu  Think hard about this, and all the adults talk it through — who is in charge? How are bills paid? Privacy? There are many ways for this to go wrong. Feb 22, 2023
  • Markets Weekend: When is a Banc not a bank? https://t.co/QoSdP3yFKx  When it offers bonds that function like deposit accounts. How Compound Banc could originate the loans mentioned does not make sense. Avoid. Avoid. AVOID! ht: @felixsalmon Feb 20, 2023

Adani Group

  • The combined market value of Adani Group’s shares have just fallen below $100 billion https://t.co/qsNPOK1xGh  The question is how much liquidity they really have, versus maturing debts and needed working capital. Paying off a few debts w/scarce liquidity could backfire Feb 22, 2023
  • Almost a month after a bombshell short seller report lopped off $132B in market value from Gautam Adani’s empire, the Indian billionaire has doubled down on his comeback strategy https://t.co/7RybNimFLC  Making a virtue of necessity, while capital costs skyrocket Feb 20, 2023
  • Adani Group stocks have seen more than $132 billion of market value wiped out since the explosive Hindenburg Research report, but none is hit as bad as Adani Total Gas https://t.co/3j9MzDyK5S  What a chart https://t.co/nlK8PZNAKZ  Feb 20, 2023

Credit

  • The $1.8 trillion student debt bubble is about to burst https://t.co/LPQAkME8BI  Do NOT borrow money to get a degree that will NOT give you the income to repay the debts. And don’t complain unless someone forced you to go to college & take on the debt Feb 25, 2023
  • An office landlord tied to money manager Pimco has defaulted on $1.7 billion of mortgage notes https://t.co/xUCEuoGkfW  Becoming a self-reinforcing cycle of skittish lenders, defaults, sagging prices for offices. Feb 24, 2023
  • A quirky German debt product is gaining fans around the world. Here’s what it is all about https://t.co/FvUnDBAfLJ  Illiquid promissory notes with low disclosure and no secondary market. I can see why borrowers like it, but all the lenders get is extra yield vs a traditional debt Feb 22, 2023
Theme: Overlay by Kaira.